Sequentiality vs. Concurrency in Games and Logic

Connections between the sequentiality/concurrency distinction and the semantics of proofs are investigated, with particular reference to games and Linear Logic.Comment: 35 pages, appeared in Mathematical Structures in Computer Scienc

Fair Testing

In this paper we present a solution to the long-standing problem of characterising the coarsest liveness-preserving pre-congruence with respect to a full (TCSP-inspired) process algebra. In fact, we present two distinct characterisations, which give rise to the same relation: an operational one based on a De Nicola-Hennessy-like testing modality which we call should-testing, and a denotational one based on a refined notion of failures. One of the distinguishing characteristics of the should-testing pre-congruence is that it abstracts from divergences in the same way as Milner¿s observation congruence, and as a consequence is strictly coarser than observation congruence. In other words, should-testing has a built-in fairness assumption. This is in itself a property long sought-after; it is in notable contrast to the well-known must-testing of De Nicola and Hennessy (denotationally characterised by a combination of failures and divergences), which treats divergence as catrastrophic and hence is incompatible with observation congruence. Due to these characteristics, should-testing supports modular reasoning and allows to use the proof techniques of observation congruence, but also supports additional laws and techniques. Moreover, we show decidability of should-testing (on the basis of the denotational characterisation). Finally, we demonstrate its advantages by the application to a number of examples, including a scheduling problem, a version of the Alternating Bit-protocol, and fair lossy communication channel

Applications of Fair Testing

In this paper we present the application of the fair testing pre-order, introduced in a previous paper, to the specification and analysis of distributed systems. This pre-order combines some features of the standard testing pre-orders, viz. the possibility to refine a specification by the resolution of nondeterminism, with a powerful feature of standard observation congruence, viz. the fair abstraction from divergences. Moreover, it is a pre-congruence with respect to all standard process-algebraic combinators, thus allowing for the standard algebraic proof techniques by substitution and rewriting. In this paper we will demonstrate advantages of the fair testing pre-order by the application to a number of examples, including a scheduling problem, a version of the Alternating Bit-protocol, and fair communication channels

Axiomatizing Prefix Iteration with Silent Steps

Prefix iteration is a variation on the original binary version of the Kleene star operation P*Q, obtained by restricting the first argument to be an atomic action. The interaction of prefix iteration with silent steps is studied in the setting of Milner's basic CCS. Complete equational axiomatizations are given for four notions of behavioural congruence over basic CCS with prefix iteration, viz. branching congruence, eta-congruence, delay congruence and weak congruence. The completeness proofs for eta-, delay, and weak congruence are obtained by reduction to the completeness theorem for branching congruence. It is also argued that the use of the completeness result for branching congruence in obtaining the completeness result for weak congruence leads to a considerable simplification with respect to the only direct proof presented in the literature. The preliminaries and the completeness proofs focus on open terms, i.e. terms that may contain process variables. As a by-product, the omega-completeness of the axiomatizations is obtained as well as their completeness for closed terms. AMS Subject Classification (1991): 68Q10, 68Q40, 68Q55.CR Subject Classification (1991): D.3.1, F.1.2, F.3.2.Keywords and Phrases: Concurrency, process algebra, basic CCS, prefix iteration, branching bisimulation, eta-bisimulation, delay bisimulation, weak bisimulation, equational logic, complete axiomatizations

Event Structure Semantics for CCS and Related Languages

We give denotational semantics to a wide range of parallel programming languages based on the ideas of Milner's CCS, that processes communicate by events of mutual synchronisation.Processes are denoted by labelled event structures. Event structures represent concurrency rather directly as in net theory.The semantics does not simulate concurrency by non-deterministic interleaving

Full abstraction for fair testing in CCS (expanded version)

In previous work with Pous, we defined a semantics for CCS which may both be viewed as an innocent form of presheaf semantics and as a concurrent form of game semantics. We define in this setting an analogue of fair testing equivalence, which we prove fully abstract w.r.t. standard fair testing equivalence. The proof relies on a new algebraic notion called playground, which represents the `rule of the game'. From any playground, we derive two languages equipped with labelled transition systems, as well as a strong, functional bisimulation between them.Comment: 80 page

Total Haskell is Reasonable Coq

We would like to use the Coq proof assistant to mechanically verify properties of Haskell programs. To that end, we present a tool, named hs-to-coq, that translates total Haskell programs into Coq programs via a shallow embedding. We apply our tool in three case studies -- a lawful Monad instance, "Hutton's razor", and an existing data structure library -- and prove their correctness. These examples show that this approach is viable: both that hs-to-coq applies to existing Haskell code, and that the output it produces is amenable to verification.Comment: 13 pages plus references. Published at CPP'18, In Proceedings of 7th ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Certified Programs and Proofs (CPP'18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 201

A formalization of unique solutions of equations in process algebra

In this thesis, a comprehensive formalization of Milner's Calculus of Communicating Systems (also known as CCS) has been done in HOL theorem prover (HOL4), based on an old work in HOL88. This includes all classical properties of strong/weak bisimulation equivalences and observation congruence, a theory of congruence for CCS, various versions of ``bisimulation up to'' techniques, and several deep theorems, namely the ``coarsest congruence contained in weak equivalence'', and three versions of the ``unique solution of equations'' theorem in Milner's book. This work is further extended to support recent developments in Concurrency Theory, namely the ``contraction'' relation and the related ``unique solutions of contractions'' theorem found by Prof. Davide Sangiorgi, University of Bologna. As a result, a rather complete theory of ``contraction'' (and a similar relation called ``expansion'') for CCS is also formalized in this thesis. Further more, a new variant of contraction called ``observational contraction'' was found by the author during this work, based on existing contraction relation. It's formally proved that, this new relation is preserved by direct sums of CCS processes, and has a more elegant form of the ``unique solutions of contractions'' theorem without any restriction on the CCS grammar. The contribution of this thesis project is at least threefold: First, it can be seen as a formal verification of the core results in Prof.\ Sangiorgi's paper, and it provides all details for the informal proof sketches given in the paper. Second, a large piece of old proof scripts from the time of Hol88 (1990s) has been ported to HOL4 and made available to all its users. Third, it's a proof engineering research by itself on the correct formalization of process algebra, because the work has made extensive uses of some new features (e.g. coinductive relation) provided in recent versions of HOL4 (Kananaskis-11 and later)