817 research outputs found
A Branch and Bound Algorithm for Exact, Upper, and Lower Bounds on Treewidth
In this paper, a branch and bound algorithm for computing the treewidth of a graph is presented. The method incorporates extensions of existing results, and uses new pruning and reduction rules, based upon roperties of the adopted branching strategy. We discuss how the algorithm can not only be used to obtain exact bounds for the treewidth, but also to obtain upper and/or lower bounds. Computational results of the algorithm are presented
Structurally Parameterized d-Scattered Set
In -Scattered Set we are given an (edge-weighted) graph and are asked to
select at least vertices, so that the distance between any pair is at least
, thus generalizing Independent Set. We provide upper and lower bounds on
the complexity of this problem with respect to various standard graph
parameters. In particular, we show the following:
- For any , an -time algorithm, where
is the treewidth of the input graph.
- A tight SETH-based lower bound matching this algorithm's performance. These
generalize known results for Independent Set.
- -Scattered Set is W[1]-hard parameterized by vertex cover (for
edge-weighted graphs), or feedback vertex set (for unweighted graphs), even if
is an additional parameter.
- A single-exponential algorithm parameterized by vertex cover for unweighted
graphs, complementing the above-mentioned hardness.
- A -time algorithm parameterized by tree-depth
(), as well as a matching ETH-based lower bound, both for
unweighted graphs.
We complement these mostly negative results by providing an FPT approximation
scheme parameterized by treewidth. In particular, we give an algorithm which,
for any error parameter , runs in time
and returns a
-scattered set of size , if a -scattered set of the same
size exists
On Directed Feedback Vertex Set parameterized by treewidth
We study the Directed Feedback Vertex Set problem parameterized by the
treewidth of the input graph. We prove that unless the Exponential Time
Hypothesis fails, the problem cannot be solved in time on general directed graphs, where is the treewidth of
the underlying undirected graph. This is matched by a dynamic programming
algorithm with running time .
On the other hand, we show that if the input digraph is planar, then the
running time can be improved to .Comment: 20
Partitioning the Bags of a Tree Decomposition into Cliques
We consider a variant of treewidth that we call clique-partitioned treewidth in which each bag is partitioned into cliques. This is motivated by the recent development of FPT-algorithms based on similar parameters for various problems. With this paper, we take a first step towards computing clique-partitioned tree decompositions.
Our focus lies on the subproblem of computing clique partitions, i.e., for each bag of a given tree decomposition, we compute an optimal partition of the induced subgraph into cliques. The goal here is to minimize the product of the clique sizes (plus 1). We show that this problem is NP-hard. We also describe four heuristic approaches as well as an exact branch-and-bound algorithm. Our evaluation shows that the branch-and-bound solver is sufficiently efficient to serve as a good baseline. Moreover, our heuristics yield solutions close to the optimum. As a bonus, our algorithms allow us to compute first upper bounds for the clique-partitioned treewidth of real-world networks. A comparison to traditional treewidth indicates that clique-partitioned treewidth is a promising parameter for graphs with high clustering
- …