Comparing the Reasoning Capabilities of Equilibrium Theories and Answer Set Programs

[Abstract] Answer Set Programming (ASP) is a well established logical approach in artificial intelligence that is widely used for knowledge representation and problem solving. Equilibrium logic extends answer set semantics to more general classes of programs and theories. When intertheory relations are studied in ASP, or in the more general form of equilibrium logic, they are usually understood in the form of comparisons of the answer sets or equilibrium models of theories or programs. This is the case for strong and uniform equivalence and their relativised and projective versions. However, there are many potential areas of application of ASP for which query answering is relevant and a comparison of programs in terms of what can be inferred from them may be important. We formulate and study some natural equivalence and entailment concepts for programs and theories that are couched in terms of inference and query answering. We show that, for the most part, these new intertheory relations coincide with their model-theoretic counterparts. We also extend some previous results on projective entailment for theories and for the new connective called fork.This research has received partial support from the European Cooperation in Science & Technology (COST) Action CA17124. The third author acknowledges the funding of project PID 2020-116201GB-I00 (Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Spain) and also the financial support supplied by the Consellería de Educación, Universidade e Formación Profesional (accreditations GPC ED431B 2022/23 and 2019–2022 ED431G-2019/01). The last author has been supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) grant Y698Xunta de Galicia; ED431B 2022/23Xunta de Galicia; ED431G-2019/0

A Brief History of Updates of Answer-Set Programs

Funding Information: The authors would like to thank José Alferes, Martin Baláz, Federico Banti, Antonio Brogi, Martin Homola, Luís Moniz Pereira, Halina Przymusinska, Teodor C. Przymusinski, and Theresa Swift, with whom they worked on the topic of this paper over the years, as well as Ricardo Gonçalves and Matthias Knorr for valuable comments on an earlier draft of this paper. The authors would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions, which greatly helped us improve this paper. The authors were partially supported by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia through projects FORGET (PTDC/CCI-INF/32219/2017) and RIVER (PTDC/CCI-COM/30952/2017), and strategic project NOVA LINCS (UIDB/04516/2020). Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press.Over the last couple of decades, there has been a considerable effort devoted to the problem of updating logic programs under the stable model semantics (a.k.a. answer-set programs) or, in other words, the problem of characterising the result of bringing up-to-date a logic program when the world it describes changes. Whereas the state-of-the-art approaches are guided by the same basic intuitions and aspirations as belief updates in the context of classical logic, they build upon fundamentally different principles and methods, which have prevented a unifying framework that could embrace both belief and rule updates. In this paper, we will overview some of the main approaches and results related to answer-set programming updates, while pointing out some of the main challenges that research in this topic has faced.publishersversionpublishe

G\"odel-Dummett linear temporal logic

We investigate a version of linear temporal logic whose propositional fragment is G\"odel-Dummett logic (which is well known both as a superintuitionistic logic and a t-norm fuzzy logic). We define the logic using two natural semantics: first a real-valued semantics, where statements have a degree of truth in the real unit interval and second a `bi-relational' semantics. We then show that these two semantics indeed define one and the same logic: the statements that are valid for the real-valued semantics are the same as those that are valid for the bi-relational semantics. This G\"odel temporal logic does not have any form of the finite model property for these two semantics: there are non-valid statements that can only be falsified on an infinite model. However, by using the technical notion of a quasimodel, we show that every falsifiable statement is falsifiable on a finite quasimodel, yielding an algorithm for deciding if a statement is valid or not. Later, we strengthen this decidability result by giving an algorithm that uses only a polynomial amount of memory, proving that G\"odel temporal logic is PSPACE-complete. We also provide a deductive calculus for G\"odel temporal logic, and show this calculus to be sound and complete for the above-mentioned semantics, so that all (and only) the valid statements can be proved with this calculus.Comment: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2205.00574, arXiv:2205.0518

Temporal Answer Set Programming

[Abstract] Commonsense temporal reasoning is full of situations that require drawing default conclusions, since we rarely have all the information available. Unfortunately, most modal temporal logics cannot accommodate default reasoning, since they typically deal with a monotonic inference relation. On the other hand, non-monotonic approaches are very expensive and their treatment of time is not so well delimited and studied as in modal logic. Temporal Equilibrium Logic (TEL) is the first non-monotonic temporal logic which fully covers the syntax of some standard modal temporal approach without requiring further constructions. TEL shares the syntax of Linear-time Temporal Logic (LTL) (first proposed by Arthur Prior and later extended by Hans Kamp) which has become one of the simplest, most used and best known temporal logics in Theoretical Computer Science. Although TEL had been already defined, few results were known about its fundamental properties and nothing at all on potential computational methods that could be applied for practical purposes. This situation unfavourably contrasted with the huge body of knowledge available for LTL, both in well-known formal properties and in computing methods with practical implementations. In this thesis we have mostly filled this gap, following a research program that has systematically analysed different essential properties of TEL and, simultaneously, built computational tools for its practical application. As an overall, this thesis collects a corpus of results that constitutes a significant breakthrough in the knowledge about TEL.[Resumen] El razonamiento temporal del sentido común está lleno de situaciones que requieren suponer conclusiones por defecto, puesto que raramente contamos con toda la información disponible. Lamentablemente, la mayoría de lógicas modales temporales no permiten modelar este tipo de razonamiento por defecto debido a que, típicamente, se definen por medio de relaciones de inferencia monótonas. Por el contrario, las aproximaciones no monótonas existentes son típicamente muy costosas pero su manejo del tiempo no está tan bien delimitado como en lógica modal. Temporal Equilibrium Logic (TEL) es la primera lógica temporal no monótona que cubre totalmente la sintaxis de alguna de las lógicas modales tradicionales sin requerir el uso de más construcciones. TEL comparte la sintaxis de Linear-time Temporal Logic (LTL) (formalismo propuesto por Arthur Prior y posteriormente extendido por Hans Kamp), que es una de las lógicas más simples, utilizadas y mejor conocidas en Teoría de la Computación. Aunque TEL había sido definido, muy pocas propiedades eran conocidas, lo que contrastaba con el vasto conocimiento de LTL que está presente en el estado del arte. En esta tesis hemos estudiado diferentes aspectos de TEL, una novedosa combinación de lógica modal temporal y un formalismo no monótono. A grandes rasgos, esta tesis recoge un conjunto de resultados, tanto desde el punto de vista teórico como práctico, que constituye un gran avance en lo relativo al conocimiento sobre TEL.[Resumo] O razoamento do sentido común aplicado ao caso temporal está cheo de situacións que requiren supoñer conclusións por defecto, posto que raramente contamos con toda a información dispoñible. Lamentablemente a maioría de lóxicas modais temporáis non permiten modelar este tipo de razoamento por defecto debido a que, típicamente, están definidas por medio de relacións de inferencia monótonas. Pola contra, as aproximacións non monótonas existentes son moi costosos e o seu tratamento do tempo non está ben tan delimitado nin estudiado como nas lóxicas modais. Temporal Equilibrium Logic (TEL) é a primeira aproximación non monótona que cubre totalmente a sintaxe dalgunha das lóxicas modais traidicionáis sen requerir o uso de máis construccións. TEL comparte a sintaxe de Lineartime Temporal Logic (LTL) (formalismo proposto por Arthur Prior e extendido posteriormente por Hans Kamp), que é considerada unha das lóxicas modais máis simples, utilizadas e coñecidas dentro da Teoría da Computación. Aínda que TEL xa fora definido previamente, moi poucas das súas propiedades eran coñecidas, dato que contrasta co vasto coñecemento de LTL existente no estado da arte. Nesta tese, estudiamos diferentes aspectos de TEL, unha novidosa combinación de lóxica modal temporal e un formalimo non monótono. A grandes rasgos, esta tese recolle un conxunto de resultados, tanto dende o punto de vista teórico como práctico, que constitúe un gran avance no relativo ó coñecemento sobre o formalismo TEL