Spartan Daily, February 27, 2019

Volume 152, Issue 15https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/spartan_daily_2019/1014/thumbnail.jp

Spartan Daily, March 27, 2019

Volume 152, Issue 27https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/spartan_daily_2019/1026/thumbnail.jp

February 27, 2019

https://egrove.olemiss.edu/thedmonline/1141/thumbnail.jp

June 27, 2019

https://egrove.olemiss.edu/thedmonline/1176/thumbnail.jp

September 27, 2019

https://egrove.olemiss.edu/thedmonline/1012/thumbnail.jp

March 27, 2019

https://egrove.olemiss.edu/thedmonline/1153/thumbnail.jp

Anderson v. State, 135 Nev. Adv. Op. 56 (Nov. 27, 2019)

The Court determined that (1) when the government relies on the forfeiture exception of the Confrontation Clause to introduce a witness’s out-of-court statements, the burden of proof the litigant must meet is that of preponderance of the evidence; and (2) that a trial court does not abuse its discretion in denying a motion to substitute counsel and thereby violate the Sixth Amendment right to counsel when the trial court holds a Young hearing for each motion and enough evidence indicates there is not a complete breakdown in the attorney-client relationship

Independent - Aug. 27, 2019

https://neiudc.neiu.edu/independent/1564/thumbnail.jp

Poasa v. State, 135 Nev. Adv. Op. 57 (Nov. 27, 2019)

The Court reaffirmed its holding in Kuykendall v. State, interpreting NRS 176.055(1) to require sentencing courts to award credit for time served in presentence confinement