24 research outputs found

    ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ๊ณผ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์˜ ์ธํ„ฐ๋ž™์…˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ดํ•ด

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ์œตํ•ฉ๊ณผํ•™๊ธฐ์ˆ ๋Œ€ํ•™์› ์œตํ•ฉ๊ณผํ•™๋ถ€(๋””์ง€ํ„ธ์ •๋ณด์œตํ•ฉ์ „๊ณต), 2019. 2. ์„œ๋ด‰์›.์ปดํ“จํŒ… ํŒŒ์›Œ์˜ ๊ฐœ์„ , ์ธํ„ฐ๋„ท๊ณผ ์†Œ์…œ๋ฏธ๋””์–ด, ๋ชจ๋ฐ”์ผ ๋””๋ฐ”์ด์Šค ๋“ฑ์˜ ๋ณด๊ธ‰์„ ํ†ตํ•œ ์ˆ˜๋งŽ์€ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์˜ ์ถ•์ , ๋”ฅ๋Ÿฌ๋‹์„ ๋น„๋กฏํ•œ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„ํ•™์Šต ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์˜ ๋ฐœ์ „์œผ๋กœ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์ด ์–ด๋Š๋•Œ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋”์šฑ ํฐ ์„ฑ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์Œ์„ฑ ์ธ์‹, ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ ๋น„์ „, ์ž์—ฐ์–ด ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ๋“ฑ์˜ ๋ถ„์•ผ์—์„œ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ์€ ์ด๋ฏธ ์ธ๊ฐ„์— ํ•„์ ํ•˜๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ํ˜น์€ ์ธ๊ฐ„์„ ๋›ฐ์–ด๋„˜๋Š” ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ณด์ด๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ž์œจ์ฃผํ–‰, ๋กœ๋ด‡, ์˜๋ฃŒ์„œ๋น„์Šค ๋“ฑ์˜ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋ถ„์•ผ์— ์ ์šฉ๋˜์–ด ์šฐ๋ฆฌ์˜ ์‚ถ์— ๋งŽ์€ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ ธ์˜ฌ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€๋œ๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ์˜ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์ ์ธ ๋ฐœ์ „์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ์˜ ์ธ๊ฐ„๊ณตํ•™์  ์š”์†Œ์™€ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ๊ฒฝํ—˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ด€์‹ฌ๊ณผ ๋…ผ์˜๊ฐ€ ์ƒ๋Œ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ€์กฑํ•œ ํŽธ์ด๋‹ค. ์ด์— ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ธ๊ฐ„์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ์˜ ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ๊ณผ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๊ฐ€ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ์‹์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋‹ค์ธต์ ์ด๊ณ  ํ†ตํ•ฉ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋กœ ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ์ธํ„ฐํŽ˜์ด์Šค ๋””์ž์ธ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ํ•จ์˜์ ์„ ๋„์ถœํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋กœ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ๊ณผ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์˜ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ์— ์ฃผ๋ชฉํ•˜๊ณ , ์ด๋ฅผ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์ธ์ง€, ํ•ด์„ ๋ฐ ํ‰๊ฐ€, ์ง€์†์ ์ธ ์ธํ„ฐ๋ž™์…˜, ์‹ค์šฉ์ ์ธ ์–ดํ”Œ๋ฆฌ์ผ€์ด์…˜์„ ์ฃผ์ œ๋กœ ํ•œ ๋„ค ๋‹จ๊ณ„์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ๊ธฐํšํ•˜๊ณ  ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ฒซ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‚ฌ๋žŒ๋“ค์˜ ์„ ํ—˜์  ์ธ์‹์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๋ น๊ณผ ์„ฑ๋ณ„, ์ง์—…์˜ ๋‹ค์–‘์„ฑ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ ์ธ๊ตฌํ†ต๊ณ„ํ•™์  ๋Œ€ํ‘œ์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ–๋Š” ์ฐธ๊ฐ€์ž๋ฅผ ๋ชจ์ง‘ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋“ค์„ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ์ธ์‹์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ •์„ฑ์  ๋ฐฉ์‹์˜ ์กฐ์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์กฐ์‚ฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์‚ฌ๋žŒ๋“ค์ด ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๊ฐ–๋Š” ์„ ์ž…๊ฒฌ๊ณผ ๊ณ ์ •๊ด€๋…์„ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์‚ฌ๋žŒ๋“ค์ด ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ์„ ์˜์ธํ™” ํ•  ๋ฟ๋งŒ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ํƒ€์žํ™” ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์ด ์žˆ์Œ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜๊ณผ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„์—์„œ ์ง€์†์ ์ด๊ณ  ์ „์ฒด์ ์ธ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์ด ์ค‘์š”ํ•จ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋‘๋ฒˆ์งธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์˜ ํ•ด์„๊ณผ ํ‰๊ฐ€์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€์˜ ๋ฏธ์  ์ ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•ด์ฃผ๋Š” ์‹ ๊ฒฝ๋ง ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์ด ๊ตฌํ˜„๋œ AI Mirror๋ผ๋Š” ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ํ”„๋กœํ† ํƒ€์ž…์„ ์ œ์ž‘ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ/๊ธฐ๊ณ„ํ•™์Šต ๋ถ„์•ผ์˜ ์ „๋ฌธ๊ฐ€, ์‚ฌ์ง„์ „๋ฌธ๊ฐ€, ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ธ์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ๋ถ„๋œ ์„ธ ์ง‘๋‹จ์˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋ฅผ ๋ชจ์ง‘ํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋Š” ์ €๋งˆ๋‹ค ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ ์ง€์‹์„ ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•ด ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ํ•ด์„ํ•˜๊ณ  ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ์‚ฌ์ง„์ „๋ฌธ๊ฐ€ ์ง‘๋‹จ์ด ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋†’์€ ์ •๋„๋กœ ํ•ด์„ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ํ•ฉ๋ฆฌ์ ์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ์—ฌ๊ธด ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด, ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ/๊ธฐ๊ณ„ํ•™์Šต ์ „๋ฌธ๊ฐ€ ์ง‘๋‹จ์€ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋‚ฎ์€ ์ •๋„๋กœ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ํ•ด์„ํ•˜๊ณ  ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ „๋žต์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์˜ ์›๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ์ถ”๋ก ํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜๊ณผ์˜ ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ์ขํ˜€๊ฐˆ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋Š” ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜๊ณผ ์Œ๋ฐฉ ์†Œํ†ต์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์˜๊ฒฌ์„ ๊ตํ™˜ํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜๋Š” ๋‹ˆ์ฆˆ๋ฅผ ํ‘œ์ถœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์„ธ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜๊ณผ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๊ฐ€ ๊ณต๋™์˜ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋ฅผ ๋‘๊ณ  ์ง€์†์ ์ธ ์ธํ„ฐ๋ž™์…˜์„ ์ด์–ด๊ฐ€๋Š” ๊ณผ์ •์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ดํ•ด๋ฅผ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋กœ ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๊ฐ€ ์ผ๋ถ€ ๊ทธ๋ฆฐ ๋ฌผ์ฒด๋ฅผ ์™„์„ฑํ•˜๊ณ  ์Šค์ผ€์น˜์— ์ƒ‰์น ์„ ์ž๋™์œผ๋กœ ์™„์„ฑํ•ด์ฃผ๋Š” ์‹ ๊ฒฝ๋ง ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜ API๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ DuetDraw๋ผ๋Š” ๋ฆฌ์„œ์น˜ ํ”„๋กœํ† ํƒ€์ž…์„ ์ œ์ž‘ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์ •๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐ ์ •์„ฑ์  ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ ์ด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ํ‰๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ํ‰๊ฐ€ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋Š” ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜๊ณผ์˜ ํ˜‘์—… ๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ์œผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๋‹จ์ˆœํ•œ ํ”ผ๋“œ๋ฐฑ ๋ณด๋‹ค๋Š” ์ž์„ธํ•œ ์„ค๋ช…์„ ์ œ๊ณต๋ฐ›๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์›ํ–ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜๊ณผ์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„์—์„œ ํ•ญ์ƒ ์ฃผ๋„์ ์ธ ์œ„์น˜์— ์žˆ๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ๊ณผ์˜ ์ธํ„ฐ๋ž™์…˜์€ ๊ณผ์—… ์ˆ˜ํ–‰์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์˜ ์˜ˆ์ธก๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ, ์ดํ•ด๋„, ํ†ต์ œ๋ ฅ์„ ๋‚ฎ์ถ”๋Š” ๊ฒฝํ•ญ์ด ์žˆ์—ˆ์ง€๋งŒ, ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์—๊ฒŒ ์ƒ๋Œ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋†’์€ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์„ฑ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜์˜€์„ ๋ฟ๋งŒ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๊ฐ€ ์ „๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋งŒ์กฑ์Šค๋Ÿฌ์šด ๊ฒฝํ—˜์„ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋์œผ๋กœ, ๋„ค๋ฒˆ์งธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋ณด๋‹ค ์‹ค์šฉ์ ์ธ ์–ดํ”Œ๋ฆฌ์ผ€์ด์…˜์„ ์ œ์ž‘ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ์ธํ„ฐ๋ž™์…˜์„ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด์— ์ตœ๊ทผ ํฐ ๊ฐ๊ด‘์„ ๋ฐ›๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ๋กœ๋ด‡์ €๋„๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ๊ตฌํ˜„ํ•œ NewsRobot์„ ์ œ์ž‘ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. NewsRobot์€ 2018 ํ‰์ฐฝ๋™๊ณ„์˜ฌ๋ฆผํ”ฝ์˜ ์ฃผ์š” ๊ฒฝ๊ธฐ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ž๋™์œผ๋กœ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ํ•˜๊ณ  ์š”์•ฝํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ๋‚ด์šฉ๊ณผ ํ˜•์‹์„ ๊ฐ๊ฐ ์ข…ํ•ฉ๋‰ด์Šค-์„ ํƒ๋‰ด์Šค, ํ…์ŠคํŠธ-์นด๋“œ-๋™์˜์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‹ฌ๋ฆฌํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‰ด์Šค๋ฅผ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ •๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐ ์ •์„ฑ์  ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ํ‰๊ฐ€ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์„ ํƒ๋‰ด์Šค๊ฐ€ ์ข…ํ•ฉ๋‰ด์Šค์— ๋น„ํ•ด ๋‚ฎ์€ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€์Œ์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ  ์„ ํƒ๋‰ด์Šค์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์˜ ๋†’์€ ์„ ํ˜ธ๋„๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ๋ฏธ๋””์–ด ๋ชจ๋‹ฌ๋ฆฌํ‹ฐ๊ฐ€ ๋†’์•„์งˆ์ˆ˜๋ก ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์˜ ๋‰ด์Šค์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋งŒ์กฑ๋„๊ฐ€ ๋†’์•„์ง€์ง€๋งŒ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์˜ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€์ˆ˜์ค€์— ์–ด๊ธ‹๋‚œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์˜คํžˆ๋ ค ๋‚ฎ์€ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ๋ฐ›๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋Š” ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์ด ์ž๋™์œผ๋กœ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•œ ๋‰ด์Šค์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ฐ๊ด€์ ์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋น ๋ฅธ ๋‰ด์Šค ์ƒ์„ฑ ์†๋„์™€ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ •๋ณด ์‹œ๊ฐํ™” ์š”์†Œ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ๋„ ๋งŒ์กฑ๊ฐ์„ ๋“œ๋Ÿฌ๋ƒˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ด ๋„ค ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋“ค์„ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ์ธ๊ฐ„-์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์‹œ์‚ฌ์ ๋“ค์„ ๋„์ถœํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ์ธํ„ฐํŽ˜์ด์Šค ๋””์ž์ธ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ํ•จ์˜์ ๋“ค์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค.The recent development of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms is affecting our daily lives in numerous areas. Moreover, AI is expected to evolve rapidly, bringing tremendous economic value. However, compared to the attention these technological improvements receive, there is relatively little discussion on human factors and user experience related to AI algorithms. Thus, this thesis aims to better understand how users interact with AI algorithms. Specifically, this work examined algorithm-based humanโ€“AI interaction in four stages, through various modes of human-computer interaction: The first study investigated how people perceive algorithm-based systems using AI, finding that people tend to anthropomorphize as well as alienate them, which is distinct from their perceptions of computers. The second study investigated how people interpret and evaluate the output from AI algorithms through a prototype, AI Mirror, which assigned aesthetic scores to images based on a neural network algorithm. The results revealed that people interpret AI algorithms differently based on their backgrounds, and that they want to understand and communicate with AI systems. The third study investigated how people build a sequence of actions with AI algorithms through a mixed method study using a research prototype called DuetDraw, a drawing tool in which users and AI can draw pictures together. The results showed that people want to lead collaborations while hoping to get appropriate instructions from the AI algorithm. Lastly, a case study on a practical application of AI was conducted with a research prototype called NewsRobot, which automatically generated news articles with different content and styles. Findings showed that users prefer selective news and multimedia news that have more functionality and modality, but at the same time they do not want AI to boast about its ability. With these distinct but intertwined studies, this thesis argues the importance of understanding human factors in the user interfaces of AI-based systems and suggests design principles to this end.1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Research Goal 10 1.3 Research Questions 11 1.4 How People Perceive Algorithm-based Systems Using Artificial Intelligence 12 1.5 How People Interpret and Evaluate Algorithm-based Systems Using Artificial Intelligence 13 1.6 How People Build Sequential Actions with Algorithm-Based Systems Using Artificial Intelligence 15 1.7 How People Use a Practical Application of an Algorithm-based Systems Using Artificial Intelligence 17 1.8 Thesis Statement 18 1.9 Contributions 18 1.10 Thesis Overview 20 2 RELATED WORK 22 2.1 Human Perception of AI Algorithms 22 2.1.1 Technophobia 22 2.1.2 Anthropomorphism 23 2.2 Users Interpretation and Evaluation of AI Algorithms 24 2.2.1 Interpretability of Algorithms and Users Concerns 24 2.2.2 Sense-making and Gap between Users and AI algorithms 25 2.2.3 User Control in Intelligent Systems 26 2.3 How People Build Sequential Actions with AI Algorithms 26 2.3.1 AI, Deep Learning, and New UX in Creative Works 27 2.3.2 Communication and Leadership among Users and AI 28 2.4 Practical Design of Algorithm-based Systems Using AI 29 2.4.1 Automated Journalism 30 2.4.2 Personalization of News Content 31 2.4.3 Effect of Multimedia Modality on User Experience 32 3 HOW PEOPLE PERCEIVE ALGORITHM-BASED SYSTEMS USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE 33 3.1 Motivation 34 3.2 Google DeepMind Challenge Match 36 3.3 Methodology 38 3.3.1 Participant Recruitment 38 3.3.2 Interview Process 39 3.3.3 Interview Analysis 40 3.4 Findings 41 3.4.1 Preconceptions about Artificial Intelligence 41 3.4.2 Confrontation: Us vs. Artificial Intelligence 43 3.4.3 Anthropomorphizing AlphaGo 47 3.4.4 Alienating AlphaGo 49 3.4.5 Concerns about the Future of AI 52 3.5 Limitations 55 3.6 Summary 56 4 HOW PEOPLE INTERPRET AND EVALUATE ALGORITHM-BASED SYSTEMS USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE 57 4.1 Motivation 58 4.2 AI Mirror 60 4.2.1 Design Goal 60 4.2.2 Image Assessment Algorithm 61 4.2.3 Design of User Interface 61 4.3 Study Design 62 4.3.1 Participant Recruitment 63 4.3.2 Experimental Settings 64 4.3.3 Procedure 65 4.3.4 Analysis Methods 66 4.4 Result 1: Quantitative Analysis 67 4.4.1 Difference 68 4.4.2 Interpretability 69 4.4.3 Reasonability 70 4.5 Result 2: Qualitative Analysis 71 4.5.1 People Understand AI Based on What They Know 71 4.5.2 People Reduce Difference Using Various Strategies 73 4.5.3 People Want to Actively Communicate with AI 76 4.6 Limitations 78 4.7 Conclusion 78 5 HOW PEOPLE BUILD SEQUENTIAL ACTIONS WITH ALGORITHM-BASED SYSTEMS USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE 80 5.1 Motivation 81 5.2 Duet Draw 84 5.2.1 Five AI Functions of DuetDraw 84 5.2.2 Initiative and Communication Styles of DuetDraw 85 5.3 Study Design 86 5.3.1 Participants 87 5.3.2 Tasks and Procedures 87 5.3.3 Drawing Scenarios 88 5.3.4 Survey 89 5.3.5 Think-aloud and Interview 89 5.3.6 Analysis Methods 90 5.4 Result 1: Quantitative Analysis 92 5.4.1 Detailed Instruction is Preferred over Basic Instruction 93 5.4.2 UX Could Be Worse with Lead-Basic than Assist-Detailed 94 5.4.3 AI is Fun, Useful, Effective, and Efficient 94 5.4.4 No-AI is more Predictable, Comprehensible, and Controllable 95 5.4.5 Even if Predictability is Low, Fun and Interest Can Increase 96 5.5 Result 2: Qualitative Analysis 96 5.5.1 Just Enough Instruction 97 5.5.2 Users Always Want to Lead 99 5.5.3 AI is Similar to Humans But Unpredictable 101 5.5.4 Co-Creation with AI 102 5.6 Limitations 105 5.7 Conclusion 105 6 HOW PEOPLE USE A PRACTICAL APPLICATION OF AN ALGORITHM-BASED SYSTEM USIGN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE 107 6.1 Motivation 108 6.2 News Robot 110 6.2.1 Selecting Main Event and Data Source 111 6.2.2 Designing News Article Structure 113 6.2.3 Content and Style 113 6.2.4 Generating News Articles 115 6.2.5 Designing NewsRobot User Interface 116 6.3 Study Design 117 6.3.1 Participants 117 6.3.2 Procedures 118 6.3.3 Analysis Methods 119 6.4 Results 1: Quantitative Analysis 120 6.4.1 Selective News Is Less Credible 120 6.4.2 Users Like Both Multimedia and Personalization 121 6.4.3 Quality of Video Is Not Rated Highest 122 6.4.4 NewsRobot Is Accurate but Not Sensational 123 6.5 Results 2: Qualitative Analysis 124 6.5.1 Users Evaluate NewsRobot Features Highly 124 6.5.2 NewsRobot Is Unbiased but Predictable 127 6.5.3 Benefits and Drawbacks of Using Multimedia 128 6.6 Limitations 130 6.7 Conclusion 130 7 DISCUSSION 131 7.1 Human Perception of AI Algorithms 131 7.1.1 Cognitive Dissonance 131 7.1.2 Beyond Technophobia 132 7.1.3 Toward a New Chapter in Human-Computer Interaction 134 7.1.4 Coping with the Potential Danger 135 7.2 Users Interpretation and Evaluation of AI Algorithms 135 7.2.1 Integrate Diverse Expertise and User Perspectives 136 7.2.2 Take Advantage of Peoples Curiosity about AI Principles 137 7.2.3 Provide AI and Users with Mutual Communication 138 7.3 How People Build Sequential Actions with AI Algorithms 139 7.3.1 Let the User Take the Initiative 140 7.3.2 Provide Just Enough Instruction 140 7.3.3 Embed Interesting Elements in the Interaction 141 7.3.4 Ensure Balance 142 7.4 Practical Design of Algorithm-based Systems Using AI 142 7.4.1 Provide Selective news with Adaptable Interface 142 7.4.2 Present Various Multimedia Elements but Not Too Many 144 7.4.3 Importance of Quality Data and Algorithm Refinement 145 7.5 Principles 146 8 CONCLUSION 148 8.1 Summary of Contributions 149 8.2 Future Directions 150 Bibliography 153 ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์ดˆ๋ก 173 ๊ฐ์‚ฌ์˜ ๊ธ€ 176Docto

    Secrecy Enhancement in Cooperative Relaying Systems

    Get PDF
    Cooperative communications is obviously an evolution in wireless networks due to its noticeable advantages such as increasing the coverage as well as combating fading and shadowing effects. However, the broadcast characteristic of a wireless medium which is exploited in cooperative communications leads to a variety of security vulnerabilities. As cooperative communication networks are globally expanded, they expose to security attacks and threats more than ever. Primarily, researchers have focused on upper layers of network architectures to meet the requirements for secure cooperative transmission while the upper-layer security solutions are incapable of combating a number of security threats, e.g., jamming attacks. To address this issue, physical-layer security has been recommended as a complementary solution in the literature. In this thesis, physical layer attacks of the cooperative communication systems are studied, and corresponding security techniques including cooperative jamming, beamforming and diversity approaches are investigated. In addition, a novel security solution for a two-hop decode-and-forward relaying system is presented where the transmitters insert a random phase shift to the modulated data of each hop. The random phase shift is created based on a shared secret among communicating entities. Thus, the injected phase shift confuses the eavesdropper and secrecy capacity improves. Furthermore, a cooperative jamming strategy for multi-hop decode-and-forward relaying systems is presented where multiple non-colluding illegitimate nodes can overhear the communication. The jamming signal is created by the transmitter of each hop while being sent with the primary signal. The jamming signal is known at the intended receiver as it is according to a secret common knowledge between the communicating entities. Hence, artificial noise misleads the eavesdroppers, and decreases their signal-to-noise-ratio. As a result, secrecy capacity of the system is improved. Finally, power allocation among friendly jamming and main signal is proposed to ensure that suggested scheme enhances secrecy

    ATHENA Research Book

    Get PDF
    The ATHENA European University is an alliance of nine Higher Education Institutions with the mission of fostering excellence in research and innovation by facilitating international cooperation. The ATHENA acronym stands for Advanced Technologies in Higher Education Alliance. The partner institutions are from France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Lithuania, Portugal, and Slovenia: the University of Orlรฉans, the University of Siegen, the Hellenic Mediterranean University, the Niccolรฒ Cusano University, the Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, the Polytechnic Institute of Porto, and the University of Maribor. In 2022 institutions from Poland and Spain joined the alliance: the Maria Curie-Skล‚odowska University and the University of Vigo. This research book presents a selection of the ATHENA university partners' research activities. It incorporates peer-reviewed original articles, reprints and student contributions. The ATHENA Research Book provides a platform that promotes joint and interdisciplinary research projects of both advanced and early-career researchers

    Epilepsy

    Get PDF
    With the vision of including authors from different parts of the world, different educational backgrounds, and offering open-access to their published work, InTech proudly presents the latest edited book in epilepsy research, Epilepsy: Histological, electroencephalographic, and psychological aspects. Here are twelve interesting and inspiring chapters dealing with basic molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying epileptic seizures, electroencephalographic findings, and neuropsychological, psychological, and psychiatric aspects of epileptic seizures, but non-epileptic as well

    Inferring implicit relevance from physiological signals

    Get PDF
    Ongoing growth in data availability and consumption has meant users are increasingly faced with the challenge of distilling relevant information from an abundance of noise. Overcoming this information overload can be particularly difficult in situations such as intelligence analysis, which involves subjectivity, ambiguity, or risky social implications. Highly automated solutions are often inadequate, therefore new methods are needed for augmenting existing analysis techniques to support user decision making. This project investigated the potential for deep learning to infer the occurrence of implicit relevance assessments from users' biometrics. Internal cognitive processes manifest involuntarily within physiological signals, and are often accompanied by 'gut feelings' of intuition. Quantifying unconscious mental processes during relevance appraisal may be a useful tool during decision making by offering an element of objectivity to an inherently subjective situation. Advances in wearable or non-contact sensors have made recording these signals more accessible, whilst advances in artificial intelligence and deep learning have enhanced the discovery of latent patterns within complex data. Together, these techniques might make it possible to transform tacit knowledge into codified knowledge which can be shared. A series of user studies recorded eye gaze movements, pupillary responses, electrodermal activity, heart rate variability, and skin temperature data from participants as they completed a binary relevance assessment task. Participants were asked to explicitly identify which of 40 short-text documents were relevant to an assigned topic. Investigations found this physiological data to contain detectable cues corresponding with relevance judgements. Random forests and artificial neural networks trained on features derived from the signals were able to produce inferences with moderate correlations with the participants' explicit relevance decisions. Several deep learning algorithms trained on the entire physiological time series data were generally unable to surpass the performance of feature-based methods, and instead produced inferences with low correlations with participants' explicit personal truths. Overall, pupillary responses, eye gaze movements, and electrodermal activity offered the most discriminative power, with additional physiological data providing diminishing or adverse returns. Finally, a conceptual design for a decision support system is used to discuss social implications and practicalities of quantifying implicit relevance using deep learning techniques. Potential benefits included assisting with introspection and collaborative assessment, however quantifying intrinsically unknowable concepts using personal data and abstruse artificial intelligence techniques were argued to pose incommensurate risks and challenges. Deep learning techniques therefore have the potential for inferring implicit relevance in information-rich environments, but are not yet fit for purpose. Several avenues worthy of further research are outlined

    Advances in Architectural Acoustics

    Get PDF
    Satisfactory acoustics is crucial for the ability of spaces such as auditoriums and lecture rooms to perform their primary function. The acoustics of dwellings and offices greatly affects the quality of our life, since we are all consciously or subconsciously aware of the sounds to which we are daily subjected. Architectural acoustics, which encompasses room and building acoustics, is the scientific field that deals with these topics and can be defined as the study of generation, propagation, and effects of sound in enclosures. Modeling techniques, as well as related acoustic theories for accurately calculating the sound field, have been the center of many major new developments. In addition, the image conveyed by a purely physical description of sound would be incomplete without regarding human perception; hence, the interrelation between objective stimuli and subjective sensations is a field of important investigations. A holistic approach in terms of research and practice is the optimum way for solving the perplexing problems which arise in the design or refurbishment of spaces, since current trends in contemporary architecture, such as transparency, openness, and preference for bare sound-reflecting surfaces are continuing pushing the very limits of functional acoustics. All the advances in architectural acoustics gathered in this Special Issue, we hope that inspire researchers and acousticians to explore new directions in this age of scientific convergence
    corecore