28 research outputs found
ΠΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡ ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ° ΡΠΊΡΠ°ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠΈ ΠΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ°Π½Π΄ΡΠ° ΠΡΡΠ°ΡΠΊΠΎ
ΠΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ°Π½Π΄Ρ ΠΡΡΠ°ΡΠΊΠΎ (1875 β 1919) β Ρ
ΡΠ΄ΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΈΠΊ, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠΉ Π²Π²Π΅Π» ΡΠΊΡΠ°ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΎΠ΅ ΠΈΡΠΊΡΡΡΡΠ²ΠΎ Π² ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΡ ΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Ρ
ΡΠ΄ΠΎΠΆΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ°. Π‘ΡΠ΄ΡΠ±Π° ΠΎΡΠΏΡΡΡΠΈΠ»Π° Π΅ΠΌΡ ΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΡΡΠΎΠΊ Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° β Π²ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ 19 Π»Π΅Ρ, Π·Π° ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠ½ ΡΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°Π» ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠΉ ΡΡΠ΄ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΏΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ²
Π‘ΠΈΠΌΠ²ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΊΠ° ΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠ° Π² Π²ΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎ-Ρ ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠ°Π½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ ΠΈΡΠ»Π°ΠΌΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΠ°Ρ : ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅Π΅ ΠΈ ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅
Π¦Π΅Π»Ρ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΡ β ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π² Π²ΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎ-Ρ
ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠ°Π½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ ΠΈΡΠ»Π°ΠΌΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΠ°Ρ
Komunikatywno-pragmatyczny aspekt czerwieni (na przykΕadzie ksiΔ ΕΌki βΠ£ Π²ΠΎΠΉΠ½Ρ Π½Π΅ ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΡΠΊΠΎΠ΅ Π»ΠΈΡΠΎβ SwietΕany Aleksijewicz)
The article presents the role of the colour red in defining two communicative and pragmatic centres (the war and the woman) in Svetlana Alexievichβs reportage War Does Not Have a Womanβs Face. The colour red plays a significant role in visualizing war events and depicting different aspects of female sensitivity
Militarization of Culture during Park Chung-heeβs Rule (1961-1979): Focus on South Korean War Movies
The study aims to identify the characteristics of South Korean war films as a component of the militarization of culture during Park Chung-heeβs rule (1961-1979). The surge in the popularity of war cinema in the 1960s stemmed from state film policies aimed at fostering the production and consumption of such films, along with heightened interest from both audiences and film companies. However, as the 1960s progressed, state intervention in the film industry increasingly influenced the production dynamics of war films, precipitating a decline in their quality and commercial success at the box office. By the 1970s, war cinema, having lost its appeal, sustained itself solely through government backing. One of the primary features of war cinema was its methods of depicting βusβ and βthemβ. From the stateβs standpoint, the ideologically sound portrayal of the enemy in war cinema entailed a dehumanized depiction of the communists, primarily North Korean soldiers, illustrating their brutality and aggression towards South Korean citizens. Such stateβs requirement, however, was paradoxical: on the one hand, the shared Korean identity theoretically allowed for the humanization of North Korean soldiers, on the other hand, their portrayal as strong adversaries committing cruel acts risked glorifying their militarized masculinity, a scenario the state sought to avoid. To reconcile this contradiction, film companies employed a strategy of their de-characterization, stripping them of individual traits and relegating to secondary roles on the periphery of the film narrative. In contrast, South Korean soldiers were portrayed as heroic figures, characterized by their individuality and robust masculinity
Π‘ΠΈΠΌΠ²ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ΄ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ ΠΊΡΡΠΌΡΠΊΠΈΡ ΡΠ°ΡΠ°Ρ
Π ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠΈΠΌΠ²ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ΄ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ ΠΊΡΡΠΌΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠ°ΡΠ°Ρ.
ΠΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Ρ ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡ, ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΡΠΈΠ΅ Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΌ ΡΠΌΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ΄Ρ, β ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΡΡ ΠΈ
ΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΠΎΠΊ. Π Π·Π°ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΈΠΌΠ²ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ
ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ, ΡΡΠΎ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠ²Π°Π»ΠΎ Π±Ρ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠΎΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π΄ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ.Π ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΡ Π²ΠΈΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π»ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΠΈΠΌΠ²ΠΎΠ»ΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ΄ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ³Ρ ΠΊΡΠΈΠΌΡΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠ°ΡΠ°Ρ.
ΠΠΈΠ·Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½Ρ Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈ, ΡΠΊΡ ΠΎΠ±βΡΠ΄Π½ΡΡΡΡ ΡΠ΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΌ Π·ΠΌΡΡΡΠΎΠΌ ΡΡΠ·Π½Ρ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ΄ΠΈ, β ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΎΠΊ Ρ ΡΡΠΊΠ½Ρ. Π
Π·Π°ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ½Ρ ΠΏΡΠ΄ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΡΡ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΡΠ΄Π½ΡΡΡΡ Π²ΠΈΠ²ΡΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ ΡΠΈΠΌΠ²ΠΎΠ»ΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ΄ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ³Ρ
ΠΌΠΈΠ½ΡΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ, ΡΠΎ ΡΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅ Π²ΡΠ΄ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ Π΄ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ.The article focuses on the peculiarities of symbols of Crimean tatars ritual clothings.
The elements which unify different ritual clothing are clefined β they are the belt and the
shawl. An conlusion the author underlines the necessity of the study of symbols of ritual
clothing of the past rohich could promote the rebirth of spiritualness of the nation
ΠΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ½Π³Π²ΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ² ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π² ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π°Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ·ΡΠΊΠ°
THE USAGE OF PARALINGUISTIC MEANS OF COMMUNICATION IN TEACHING
A FOREIGN LANGUAGE (AS AN EXAMPLE AT BSATU) / L. VASILYEVAΠΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ° ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ½Π³Π²ΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ² ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π² ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π°Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ·ΡΠΊΠ° (ΡΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΠ΅, ΠΊΠΈΠ½Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ Π³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅). ΠΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π°ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΡ Π² Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΊΠ΅ Π»ΠΈΠ½Π³Π²ΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΈΡ
Π°ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΎΠ², ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠ΅ Π²Π΅ΡΠ±Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈ Π½Π΅Π²Π΅ΡΠ±Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ² Π² ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈ, ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΎ ΠΈ ΡΠΎΠ»Ρ Π½Π΅Π²Π΅ΡΠ±Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π²ΡΡ
ΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π² ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΌΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΌ Π°ΠΊΡΠ΅ ΠΈ Π΄Ρ. Π£ΠΊΠ°Π·ΡΠ²Π°ΡΡΡΡ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ·Π½Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΌΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π²Π²ΠΈΠ΄Ρ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠ° ΡΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ ΡΠ·ΡΠΊΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ²; ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ»ΠΈΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΈΠ·Π±Ρ-ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ·ΡΠΊΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ² Π² ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΌΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ. Π Π°ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΡΡ Π²Π΅ΡΠ±Π°Π»ΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΠΈ Π½Π΅Π²Π΅ΡΠ±Π°Π»ΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΌΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ, ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΡΡΡΠΈΠ΅ Π² ΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΡΡΡΠΈΠ΅ Π΄ΡΡΠ³ Π΄ΡΡΠ³Π°, Π° ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠ³Π΄Π° ΠΈ Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ·Π°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ΅, Π±Π»Π°Π³ΠΎΠ΄Π°ΡΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π±Π°Π·ΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ½ΡΡ
Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΊ ΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈ Π½Π΅ΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π·Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ²
Vsevolod Meyerhold: Life in the Rhythm of Epochs
The article was submitted on 07.02.2024.Π Π°ΡΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π½Π° Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π. Π. ΠΠ΅ΠΉΠ΅ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ΄Π° ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π³Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ, Π½Π°ΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΡΡΠ°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π½Π΅ΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΏΠ°Π΅ΠΌΡΠΌ ΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π½Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π°ΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΈΡΠΊΡΡΡΡΠ²Π΅. ΠΡΠ°ΠΏΡ Π΅Π³ΠΎ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ ΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΊΠ°Π»Π΅ΡΠ½Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΡΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΡΠΈ (1896β1939) ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎΠ΄Π½Ρ ΠΏΠΎ-ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΆΠ½Π΅ΠΌΡ ΡΡΠ΅Π±ΡΡΡ Π²Π½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ. Π¦Π΅Π»Ρ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ β Ρ ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΌ Π½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΠΉΡΠΈΡ
ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡ ΠΎ ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅, ΠΎΠ± ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π°ΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΡΠΊΡΡΡΡΠ²Π° Π΄Π°ΡΡ Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΠΈ ΡΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎ-ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅Ρ Π½Π° ΡΠΎΠ½Π΅ ΡΠΏΠΎΡ
Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½, ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΡ Π΄Π²ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΠΉ, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ ΠΈ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ Π΅Π³ΠΎ Π³Π»Π°Π²Π½ΠΎΠΉ, ΠΈΡΡΠΈΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½ΡΡ (ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Ρ ΡΡΡΠ΄ΠΈΠΈ, ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΠΈΠ²ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ°, ΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ½ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π΄Π²ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ Ρ Π²Π΅ΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ, ΡΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠ° ΠΎΡ ΠΆΠ΅ΡΡΠ° ΠΈ Π΄Π²ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·Ρ). Π Π·Π°Π΄Π°ΡΡ Π°Π²ΡΠΎΡΠ° Π²Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΠΎΠΊΡΡΠ±ΡΡ 1917 Π³., Π²ΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΡΡ
ΡΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½ΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° ΠΠ΅ΠΉΠ΅ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ΄Π° 1920β1930βΡ
Π³Π³., ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ ΠΆΠ΅ΡΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΠ½ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π²Π΅ΡΠ³Π°Π»ΡΡ, ΡΠ΅Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ°. ΠΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ ΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π°ΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ° Π² Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ²ΡΠ·ΠΈ Ρ Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ΄ΡΠ±ΠΎΠΉ.This article deals with the personality of V. E. Meyerhold as a multifaceted national genius, whose legacy remains an inexhaustible source of knowledge about theatre art. The stages of his more than forty-year creative path still require attention and study. The authorβs aim is to draw a human and creative-professional portrait of him against the background of the social changes of the period, the development of his directorial ideas, which were his real life (the idea of the studio, stage constructivism, the combination of horizontal and vertical movements, the actorβs progression from gesture and movement to image). The authorβs task is to determine the peculiarities of his public position after October 1917, to highlight the most significant events in Meyerholdβs life and creative work in the 1920s and 1930s, and to explain the reasons for the harsh criticism to which he was subjected. The author of the article uses the method of historical reconstruction of the theatrical process in connection with his personal fate