Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, CSIC
Doi
Abstract
This research has been possible thanks to a
grant IJC2020-046071-I funded by MCIN/AEI
/10.13039/501100011033 and by the European Union
NextGenerationEU/PRTR. Work produced with the
support of a 2023 Leonardo Grant for Scientific
Research and Cultural Creation, BBVA Foundation.
The author is part of the following research projects:
Heritages of Hunger: Societal Reflections on Past
European Famines in Education, Commemoration and
Musealisation (NWA. 1160.18.197; NWO; Radboud
University/NIOD Institute) and La hambruna española:
causas, desarrollo, consecuencias y memoria (1939-1952) (PID2019-109470GB-I00; Ministerio de Economía;
Universidad de Granada), that have contributed to funding
the research that supports this article.This article analyses one of the main social policies in post-war Spain: the welfare policies of
Auxilio Social. In particular, it explores the conditions and daily operation of the Comedores Infantiles and Cocinas
de Hermandad run by that Falangist institution in Madrid in the immediate postwar period (1939 and 1940). This
work sustaines that the rations served in these charitable-assistance institutions were fewer, smaller, and of worse
quality than officially recognised. Therefore, the food given to the needy mothers and children at these Auxilio
Social premises was insufficient to quell their hunger. Moreover, since the facilities did not meet the minimum
conditions of size, cleanliness, ventilation, and kitchen utensils, the attendees were exposed to infectious diseases.
It is also argued that, beyond the food supply problems of those famine years, the ineffectiveness of the Comedores
and Cocinas was often due to the staff who worked in them, as they often used to steal food for their own
consumption or to sell on the black market. Finally, it is argued that, given its failure to feed the needy, Auxilio
Social’s aim of extending support to the dictatorship through the guise of charity was tarnished.Este artículo analiza una de las principales políticas sociales de posguerra: el asistencialismo de
Auxilio Social. En particular, explora las condiciones y el funcionamiento cotidiano de los Comedores Infantiles y
las Cocinas de Hermandad de esta institución falangista en el Madrid de la inmediata posguerra (1939 y 1940). Se
sostiene la tesis de que las raciones servidas en estas instituciones benéfico-asistenciales eran menos, más pequeñas
y de peor calidad que las reconocidas oficialmente. Y que, por tanto, las madres y los niños asistidos no lograban
apagar su hambre tras su paso por estos locales de Auxilio Social. Al contrario, al no reunir las instalaciones unas
condiciones mínimas de tamaño, limpieza, ventilación o menaje los asistidos se exponían a contagios infecciosos.
Asimismo, se defiende que, más allá de los problemas de suministros en aquellos años de hambre, la responsa-
bilidad de la inoperancia de Comedores y Cocinas recayó a menudo en el personal que trabajaba en ellos, que
acostumbraba a sustraer alimentos para su consumo particular o para su desvío al mercado negro. Por último, se
sostiene que, dado su fracaso a la hora de dar de comer a los necesitados, el objetivo de Auxilio Social de extender
el consentimiento hacia la dictadura mediante el reclamo de la caridad se vio empañado.MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 IJC2020-046071-IEuropean Union NextGenerationEU/PRTRBBVA FoundationPID2019-109470GB-I00Ministerio de EconomíaUniversidad de Granad
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.