textjournal article
A Comparison of Phase Organization of Model Segmented Polyurethanes with Different Intersegment Compatibilities
Abstract
Three series of chemically well-defined polyurethanes were synthesized with the same hard segments but different soft-segment chemistries of interest in biomedical applications. The multiblock polyurethanes have soft segments composed of either an aliphatic polycarbonate [poly(1,6-hexyl 1,2-ethyl carbonate)], polytetramethylenoxide, or a mixed macrodiol of polyhexamethylenoxide and hydroxyl-terminated poly(dimethylsiloxane) and the same hard-segment chemistry [4,4′-methylenediphenyl diisocyanate and 1,4-butanediol]. Analysis using small-angle X-ray scattering and other methods demonstrates that demixing of the hard and soft segments varies greatly between the three series of copolymers. For example, the PDMS/PHMO-based copolymers exhibit a three-phase, core−shell morphology, while the other two series exhibit a typical two-phase structure. In addition to quantitative measurements of hard/soft-segment demixing for the two-phase copolymers, FTIR spectroscopy was used to assess inter- and intracomponent hydrogen bonding, and tapping mode AFM was used to characterize the nanoscale morphology- Text
- Journal contribution
- Biophysics
- Medicine
- Biotechnology
- Developmental Biology
- Plasma Physics
- Space Science
- Environmental Sciences not elsewhere classified
- Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified
- Chemical Sciences not elsewhere classified
- Physical Sciences not elsewhere classified
- series exhibit
- multiblock polyurethanes
- nanoscale morphology
- copolymers
- Phase Organization
- aliphatic polycarbonate
- demixing
- Different Intersegment CompatibilitiesThree series
- mode AFM
- Model Segmented Polyurethanes
- PDMS
- FTIR spectroscopy
- intracomponent hydrogen