Mean and standard error of estimated occupancy in hunting vs. non-hunting areas for the 3 species for which hunting was present in the top models and received >0.5 Akaike weight.

Peter L. Erb (312456); William J. McShea (312457); Robert P. Guralnick (76182)

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0042574.g002

Mean and standard error of estimated occupancy in hunting vs. non-hunting areas for the 3 species for which hunting was present in the top models and received >0.5 Akaike weight.

By Peter L. Erb (312456), William J. McShea (312457) and Robert P. Guralnick (76182)

Abstract

<p>Asterisks represent level of significance based on two sample t-test assuming unequal variance (*** = p<0.001).</p

Topics: Biological Sciences, ecology, Ecological environments, Terrestrial environments, biodiversity, biogeography, Conservation science, Macroecology, Spatial and landscape ecology, Zoology, Mammalogy, occupancy, non-hunting, areas, was, models, received, akaike

Year: 2013

DOI identifier: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042574.g002

OAI identifier: oai:figshare.com:article/266262

Provided by: FigShare

Download PDF:
_{Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the
following location(s):}

https://figshare.com/articles/... (external link)

Mean and standard error of estimated occupancy in hunting vs. non-hunting areas for the 3 species for which hunting was present in the top models and received >0.5 Akaike weight.

Abstract

Suggested articles