9 research outputs found

    The Relation of Physical Activity by the IPAQ to Health-related Quality of Life - Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) β…£ 2007-2008

    Get PDF
    Objectives: This study aimed to assess the association between physical activity and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in Koreans. Methods: A total of 9,689 adults(β‰₯19 years, 4,036 men) from the Fourth National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey(2007-2008) were examined by the International Physical Activity Questionnaraire (IPAQ)-short form and Korean EuroQol-5 Dimension(KEQ-5D). Results: For the physical activity by IPAQ, β€˜Inactive group’ was 75.3%, β€˜Minimally active group’ was 23.5%, and β€˜Health-Enhancing Physical Activity(HEPA) group’ was 1.2%. The mean HRQOL index was 0.89Β±0.13. These relations of physical activity and HRQOL remained significant after adjustment for age, sex, smoking, subjective health status, stress, depression, and socioeconomic status variables (Adjusted RΒ² = 0.334). Conclusions: Physical activity was associated with health-related quality of life. Physically active group had higher health-related quality of life than the inactive groupope

    Current Status of Health and Welfare Long-Term Plans in Korea

    Get PDF
    Korea is undergoing a rapid environmental change in health and welfare. Therefore, the law mandates the establishment and implementation of plans in accordance with the changes. A total of 49 long-term plans related to health and welfare were specified by the National Law Information Center, the Korean representative legal information website managed by the Korea Ministry of Government Legislation. Of the 49 long-term plans, 10 plans (20.4%) were not yet fully constructed. Eight out of 10 non-constructive plans have been put into force for more than a year, but these plans still require further systematic planning and development. The complete construction of long-term plans is substantial to account for the changes in South Korean health and welfare. In addition, a systematic plan with solidarity and continuity between the mutual plans should be established in planning.ope

    The relation of physical activity by the IPAQ to health-related quality of life

    Get PDF
    κ±΄κ°•μ¦μ§„κ΅μœ‘ν•™κ³Ό/석사[ν•œκΈ€]λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” 제4κΈ° κ΅­λ―Όκ±΄κ°•μ˜μ–‘μ‘°μ‚¬ 자료λ₯Ό μ΄μš©ν•˜μ—¬ ν•œκ΅­ν˜• μ‚Άμ˜ 질 κ°€μ€‘μΉ˜ λͺ¨ν˜•μ„ λ°”νƒ•μœΌλ‘œ μ‹ μ²΄ν™œλ™λ„μ™€ 건강관련 μ‚Άμ˜ 질의 μƒν˜Έκ΄€λ ¨μ„±μ„ μ„ΈλΆ€μ μœΌλ‘œ λΆ„μ„ν•˜μ—¬, μ‹ μ²΄ν™œλ™ μž₯렀와 건강관련 μ‚Άμ˜ 질 μˆ˜μ€€ νŒŒμ•…μ˜ 기초자료λ₯Ό μ œκ³΅ν•˜κ³ μž μ‹œλ„λ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. μ—°κ΅¬λŒ€μƒμ€ 2007λ…„κ³Ό 2008λ…„ μ‹œν–‰λœ κ΅­λ―Όκ±΄κ°•μ˜μ–‘μ‘°μ‚¬ 자료λ₯Ό μ΄μš©ν•˜μ—¬ 19μ„Έ 이상 10,412λͺ…μ˜ ν”Όμ‘°μ‚¬μžλ“€ 쀑 섀문응닡이 λΆ€μ‹€ν•œ 723λͺ…을 μ œμ™Έν•œ 9,689λͺ…을 λŒ€μƒμœΌλ‘œ ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 자료 뢄석은 μ—°κ΅¬λŒ€μƒμžμ˜ μΈκ΅¬μ‚¬νšŒν•™μ  νŠΉμ„±κ³Ό μ‹ μ²΄ν™œλ™λ„λ₯Ό ν¬ν•¨ν•œ κ±΄κ°•ν–‰νƒœμ  νŠΉμ„±μ„ λ…λ¦½λ³€μˆ˜λ‘œ, 건강관련 μ‚Άμ˜ μ§ˆμ„ μ’…μ†λ³€μˆ˜λ‘œ ν•˜μ—¬ λΉˆλ„λΆ„μ„ 및 ꡐ차뢄석을 톡해 각 λ³€μˆ˜κ°„μ˜ 건강관련 μ‚Άμ˜ 질 차이λ₯Ό λΉ„κ΅ν•˜μ˜€μœΌλ©°, λ‘œμ§€μŠ€ν‹± νšŒκ·€λΆ„μ„κ³Ό μœ„κ³„μ  λ‹€μ€‘μ„ ν˜•νšŒκ·€λΆ„μ„μ„ μ΄μš©ν•˜μ—¬ 건강관련 μ‚Άμ˜ μ§ˆμ— 영ν–₯을 λ―ΈμΉ˜λŠ” λ³€μˆ˜λ₯Ό λΆ„μ„ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. ν†΅κ³„μ²˜λ¦¬λŠ” SPSS 12.0 for Windowsλ₯Ό μ΄μš©ν•˜μ˜€μœΌλ©° μœ μ˜μˆ˜μ€€μ€ 0.05둜 ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. μ—°κ΅¬κ²°κ³ΌλŠ” λ‹€μŒκ³Ό κ°™μ•˜λ‹€. ꡭ제 μ‹ μ²΄ν™œλ™μ„€λ¬Έλ„κ΅¬μ— μ˜ν•΄ λΆ„λ₯˜λœ μ‹ μ²΄ν™œλ™λ„λŠ” λΉ„ν™œλ™ κ·Έλ£Ή 75.3%, μ΅œμ†Œν•œμ˜ ν™œλ™ κ·Έλ£Ή 23.5%, κ±΄κ°•μ¦μ§„ν˜• ν™œλ™ κ·Έλ£Ή 1.2%이고, μ‹ μ²΄ν™œλ™μ„ MET으둜 ν™˜μ‚°ν•œ κ²°κ³Ό 354.68Β±588.255 MET(min/week)으둜 λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬λ‹€. μ—°κ΅¬λŒ€μƒμžμ˜ 건강관련 μ‚Άμ˜ μ§ˆμ€ 성별, μ—°λ Ή, κ²°ν˜Όμƒνƒœ, κ΅μœ‘μˆ˜μ€€, μ£Όνƒμ†Œμœ μ—¬λΆ€, κ°€κ΅¬μ†Œλ“, 직업, 음주, ν˜„μž¬ 흑연여뢀, μ‹ μ²΄ν™œλ™λ„, 주관적 κ±΄κ°•μƒνƒœ, 슀트레슀 인지, μš°μšΈμ¦μƒ κ²½ν—˜μ— 따라 μœ μ˜ν•œ 차이가 μžˆμ—ˆλ‹€. μ‹ μ²΄ν™œλ™λ„λŠ” 건강관련 μ‚Άμ˜ 질과 ν†΅κ³„μ μœΌλ‘œ μœ μ˜ν•œ 관련성이 μžˆμ—ˆμœΌλ©°, 건강관련 μ‚Άμ˜ 질과 κ΄€λ ¨λœ μ—¬λŸ¬ μš”μΈλ“€μ„ λ³΄μ •ν•œ ν›„ μ‹ μ²΄ν™œλ™μ„ ν•˜λŠ” 그룹이 그렇지 μ•Šμ€ 그룹에 λΉ„ν•΄ 건강관련 μ‚Άμ˜ 질이 λ†’κ²Œ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬λ‹€. ν–₯ν›„ 건강관련 μ‚Άμ˜ μ§ˆμ„ ν–₯μƒμ‹œν‚€κΈ° μœ„ν•΄μ„œλŠ”, κ΅­κ°€ μˆ˜μ€€μ˜ 보건볡지정책 μˆ˜λ¦½μ΄λ‚˜ μ§€μ—­μ‚¬νšŒ μˆ˜μ€€μ˜ 건강증진 ν”„λ‘œκ·Έλž¨μ„ μ‹œν–‰ν•  λ•Œμ— 이에 영ν–₯을 λ―ΈμΉ˜λŠ” μ‹ μ²΄ν™œλ™λ„λ₯Ό 적극적으둜 κ³ λ €ν•΄μ•Ό ν•  κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ μ‚¬λ£Œλœλ‹€. [영문]ope

    Oral Health Status and Behavior Factors Associated with Self-Rated Health Status among the Elderly in South Korea: The 7th Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2016–2018)

    Get PDF
    Background: It is getting important to improve the oral health status of the elderly because oral health status may affect their healthstatus of the whole body. In this respect, we aimed to explore the association of oral health status and behavior factors withself-rated health status by sex. Methods: Using the data from the 7th Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey for health surveys and oralexaminations (2016–2018), we analyzed a total of 3,070 people aged 65 or older (men: 1,329; women: 1,741). Our dependentvariable, self-rated health status, was divided into two groups: not good (bad and very bad) and good (very good, good, and fair),whereas our independent variables of interest were oral health status and behavior factors. In addition to descriptive analysis and theRao-Scott chi-square test, reflecting survey characteristics, we conducted hierarchical multivariable logistic regression analysesadjusted for socio-demographics and health status and behavior factors. All analyses were stratified by sex. Results: The proportion of people having β€˜not good’ self-rated health was 36.5% in women but 24.5% in men. In a model adjusted forall covariates, the self-rated health status showed significant association with the self-rated oral health status. For example, in men,the risk of having β€˜not good’ self-rated health was high in people having β€˜poor’ (odds ratio [OR], 5.31; 95% confidence interval [CI],2.34–12.03) self-rated oral health status and in those having β€˜fair’ (OR, 4.03; 95% CI, 1.68–9.70) in comparison with those havingβ€˜good’ self-rated oral health status. Dental status regarding speaking difficulty seemed to be very important in influencing self-ratedhealth status. For instance, in women, compared to people having β€˜no discomfort’ speaking difficulty, the risk of having β€˜not good’self-rated health was high in people having β€˜not bad’ (OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.14–2.24) and β€˜discomfort’ (OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.30–2.47)speaking difficulty. The covariates significantly associated with the risk of having β€˜not good’ self-rated health were: physical activity,chronic disease, stress, and body mass index in both sexes; health insurance type and drinking only in men; and economic activityonly in women. Conclusion: Oral health status and behavioral factors were associated with self-rated health status among the elderly, differently bysex. This suggests that public health policies toward better health in the elderly should take their oral health status and oral healthbehaviors into account in a sex-specific way.ope

    μ •λΆ€μœ„μ›νšŒ 운영과 정책성과에 κ΄€ν•œ 연ꡬ

    Get PDF
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ (박사)-- μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ ν–‰μ •λŒ€ν•™μ› ν–‰μ •ν•™κ³Ό, 2017. 8. 이수영.λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” ν–‰μ • 및 μžλ¬Έμœ„μ›νšŒλ₯Ό ν¬ν•¨ν•œ μ •λΆ€μœ„μ›νšŒμ˜ 운영 ν˜„ν™©μ— λŒ€ν•˜μ—¬ λΆ„μ„ν•˜κ³ , μ •λΆ€μœ„μ›νšŒ 운영과 μ •μ±… μ„±κ³Ό κ°„ 관계λ₯Ό μ‚΄νŽ΄λ³΄μ•˜λ‹€. μ •λΆ€μœ„μ›νšŒλŠ” μ „λž΅μ  선택이둠과 λ‰΄κ±°λ²„λ„ŒμŠ€ 이둠에 μ˜ν•˜μ—¬ κ·Έ μ„€μΉ˜ 타당성을 인정할 수 μžˆλ‹€. μ •λΆ€κ°€ ν•΄κ²°ν•΄μ•Ό ν•˜λŠ” 문제의 λ³΅μž‘μ„±μ΄ μ¦κ°€ν•˜κ³  μžˆμŒμ—λ„ κ·Έ 문제λ₯Ό ν•΄κ²°ν•΄μ•Ό ν•˜λŠ” κ΄€λ£Œμ˜ 전문성이 λ’€λ–¨μ–΄μ§„λ‹€λŠ” 인식과, μ •μ±…κ³Όμ •μ˜ λŒ€ν‘œμ„±κ³Ό 민주성이 강화될 수 μžˆλ„λ‘ μ°Έμ—¬λ₯Ό κ°•ν™”ν•΄μ•Ό ν•œλ‹€λŠ” λ…Όλ¦¬λŠ” μœ„μ›νšŒλ₯Ό ν†΅ν•œ μ™ΈλΆ€ μ „λ¬Έκ°€ 및 μ΄ν•΄κ΄€κ³„μž λ“±μ˜ μ •μ±…μ°Έμ—¬λ₯Ό μ •λ‹Ήν™”ν•˜λŠ” κ·Όκ±°κ°€ λ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ ν•„μš”μ„±μ—λ„ λΆˆκ΅¬ν•˜κ³  μ •λΆ€μœ„μ›νšŒλŠ” ν˜„μ‹€μ μœΌλ‘œ λ§Žμ€ λΉ„νŒμ— 직면해 μžˆλ‹€. μœ„μ›νšŒ 남섀 및 λΆ€μ μ ˆν•œ 운영, 그리고 μœ„μ› κ΅¬μ„±μ˜ λΆˆκ³΅μ •μ„±μ— λŒ€ν•˜μ—¬ λΉ„νŒμ΄ μžˆλŠ” 상황이닀. μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ λΉ„νŒμ˜ λ‚΄μš©μ„ μˆ˜μš©ν•˜κ³ , μœ„μ›νšŒμ˜ 효과적 μš΄μ˜μ„ μœ„ν•˜μ—¬, 총괄 λΆ€μ²˜λŠ” μ •λΆ€μœ„μ›νšŒμ˜ 수λ₯Ό μ§‘κΆŒμ μœΌλ‘œ κ΄€λ¦¬ν•˜λŠ” λ°©μ•ˆμ„ μˆ˜λ¦½ν•˜μ—¬ μ™”λ‹€. κ·ΈλŸ¬λ‚˜ μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ λŒ€μ‘μ—λ„ λΆˆκ΅¬ν•˜κ³  μ •λΆ€μœ„μ›νšŒλŠ” 증가좔세에 있으며, κ·Έ μ—­ν•  및 μ€‘μš”μ„± λ˜ν•œ μ¦κ°€ν•˜κ³  μžˆλŠ” 상황이닀. κ·Έ 이유λ₯Ό μ •λΆ€μœ„μ›νšŒμ˜ 증가 μœ λ„ μš”μΈκ³Ό μ •λΆ€μœ„μ›νšŒμ˜ μΆ•μ†Œ μ–΅μ œ μš”μΈμ΄ μž‘λ™ν•˜κ³  있기 λ•Œλ¬ΈμœΌλ‘œ λ³Ό 수 μžˆλ‹€. λ¨Όμ € 증가 유발 μš”μΈμ€ μ •λΆ€ 업무가 μ¦κ°€ν•˜λ©΄μ„œ μ •λΆ€ μ™ΈλΆ€μ˜ μžμ›μ„ μ·¨ν•  ν•„μš”κ°€ 있으며, 특히 μ§€μ‹μ΄λ‚˜ 정책에 λŒ€ν•œ 지지λ₯Ό μœ„μ›νšŒλ₯Ό 톡해 확보할 ν•„μš”κ°€ μžˆλ‹€λŠ” 점, 그리고 μ •λΆ€μ˜ μ •μ±…μˆ˜λ¦½ κΈ°λŠ₯이 강화됨에 따라 정책을 λ³΄μ™„ν•˜κ±°λ‚˜ μ •λ‹Ήν™”ν•  수 μžˆλŠ” μœ„μ›νšŒμ˜ 역할이 μ¦κ°€ν•˜κ³  μžˆλ‹€λŠ” 점 두 κ°€μ§€λ‘œ μ„€λͺ…ν•  수 μžˆμ„ 것이닀. λ‹€μŒμœΌλ‘œ μ •λΆ€μœ„μ›νšŒ μΆ•μ†Œλ₯Ό μ–΅μ œν•˜λŠ” μš”μΈ μ—­μ‹œ 두 가지 μΈ‘λ©΄μ—μ„œ μ‚΄νŽ΄λ³΄κ³  μžˆλŠ”λ° λ¨Όμ €, 법λ₯ μ— κ·Όκ±°ν•œ μ •λΆ€μœ„μ›νšŒκ°€ 증가함에 따라 μœ„μ›νšŒμ˜ 역할이 루틴화, κ³ μ°©ν™” 될 수 있으며, μœ„μ›νšŒ 폐지λ₯Ό μœ„ν•΄ 법λ₯  κ°œμ •μ΄ ν•„μš”ν•˜λ‹€λŠ” 점은 μ •λΆ€μœ„μ›νšŒμ˜ μΆ•μ†Œλ₯Ό μ–΄λ ΅κ²Œ ν•˜λŠ” μš”μΈμ΄ 될 수 μžˆμ„ 것이닀. 그리고 λ²•μΉ˜ν–‰μ • ν˜Ήμ€ ν–‰μ •μ˜ ν˜•μ‹ν™” ν˜„μƒμœΌλ‘œ μΈν•˜μ—¬ ν–‰μ •μ˜ 절차적 츑면이 κ°•μ‘°λ˜κ³  있기 λ•Œλ¬Έμ— λ²•μ •κ³„νš λ“±μ˜ μ‹¬μ˜ 및 ν™•μ • 기ꡬ둜써 μœ„μ›νšŒμ˜ μ—­ν•  μ—­μ‹œ 법정화 λ˜λŠ” κ²½ν–₯이 μ‹¬ν™”λ˜κ³  μžˆλ‹€λŠ” 점은 μœ„μ›νšŒμ˜ μΆ•μ†Œλ₯Ό μ–΅μ œν•˜λŠ” μš”μΈμ΄ 될 수 μžˆλŠ” 것이닀. λ‹€μŒμœΌλ‘œ μ •λΆ€μœ„μ›νšŒμ˜ 역할에 λŒ€ν•˜μ—¬ λ‹¨μˆœνžˆ 정책을 μ •λ‹Ήν™”ν•˜λŠ” 도ꡬ에 머무λ₯΄λŠ” 것이 μ•„λ‹Œκ°€ ν•˜λŠ” λΉ„νŒμ΄ μžˆλ‹€. 이에 λŒ€ν•˜μ—¬ μ •λΆ€μœ„μ›νšŒκ°€ λ‹€λ£¨λŠ” μ—…λ¬΄μ˜ λ‚΄μš©μ„ 이읡에 κ΄€ν•œ 것과 정책에 κ΄€ν•œ κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ κ΅¬λΆ„ν•˜κ³ , μœ„μ› κ΅¬μ„±μ˜ μΈ‘λ©΄μ—μ„œ μ •λΆ€μœ„μ›μ΄ 더 많이 μ°Έμ—¬ν•˜λ„λ‘ ν•˜κ³  μžˆλŠ”μ§€, λ―Όκ°„μœ„μ›νšŒ 더 많이 μ°Έμ—¬ν•˜λ„λ‘ ν•˜κ³  μžˆλŠ”μ§€λ₯Ό κΈ°μ€€μœΌλ‘œ ν•˜μ—¬, λ„€ 가지 μœ ν˜•μ˜ μ •λΆ€μœ„μ›νšŒλ₯Ό κ΅¬λΆ„ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 정책을 λ‹€λ£¨λ©΄μ„œ λ―Όκ°„μœ„μ›μ΄ 더 많이 μ°Έμ—¬ν•˜λŠ” 경우 λ―Όμ£Όν˜• μœ„μ›νšŒ, 정책을 λ‹€λ£¨λ©΄μ„œ μ •λΆ€μœ„μ›μ΄ 더 많이 μ°Έμ—¬ν•˜λŠ” 경우 μƒμ§•ν˜• μœ„μ›νšŒ, 이읡을 λ‹€λ£¨λ©΄μ„œ λ―Όκ°„μœ„μ› μ€‘μ‹¬μœΌλ‘œ κ΅¬μ„±ν•˜λŠ” 경우 μ „λ¬Έμ§€μ‹ν˜• μœ„μ›νšŒ, 이읡을 λ‹€λ£¨λ©΄μ„œ μ •λΆ€μœ„μ›μ΄ 더 많이 μ°Έμ—¬ν•˜λŠ” 경우 μ •λ‹Ήν™”ν˜• μœ„μ›νšŒλ‘œ κ΅¬λΆ„ν•˜μ˜€μœΌλ©°, 각각의 μœ„μ›νšŒλŠ” κ·Έ μ—­ν• κ³Ό λ‹΄λ‹Ή μ—…λ¬΄μ˜ λ‚΄μš©μ΄ λ‹¬λΌμ§ˆ 수 μžˆλ‹€λŠ” 점을 λ³΄μ—¬μ£Όμ—ˆλ‹€. μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ μ •λΆ€μœ„μ›νšŒμ˜ λΉ„νŒμ μΈ μ£Όμž₯듀을 μ‚΄νŽ΄λ΄„μœΌλ‘œμ¨ μ •λΆ€μœ„μ›νšŒμ˜ μ„€μΉ˜ ν•„μš”μ„±κ³Ό μ„€μΉ˜ μ •λ‹Ήμ„± 등에 λŒ€ν•œ λ…Όμ˜λ₯Ό μ „κ°œν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. μ „λž΅μ  선택이둠을 μ μš©ν•˜μ—¬ μ •λΆ€μœ„μ›νšŒ 운영과 μ •μ±…μ„±κ³Ό κ°„ 관계에 λŒ€ν•˜μ—¬ μ‚΄νŽ΄λ³΄μ•˜λŠ”λ°, μž¬μ •μ‚¬μ—…μžμœ¨ν‰κ°€ 데이터λ₯Ό μ΄μš©ν•˜μ—¬ μž¬μ •μ‚¬μ—… 쀑 μœ„μ›νšŒκ°€ 직, κ°„μ ‘μ μœΌλ‘œ 관련이 μžˆλŠ” 사업을 λŒ€μƒμœΌλ‘œ μœ„μ›νšŒμ˜ νŠΉμ„±λ³€μˆ˜μ™€ μž¬μ •μ‚¬μ—…μ˜ 관계λ₯Ό λΆ„μ„ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. μœ„μ›νšŒ μ„€μΉ˜ 및 μš΄μ˜μ— μžˆμ–΄ μ „λž΅μ  선택이둠을 μ μš©ν•œ μ΄μœ λŠ” μœ„μ›νšŒμ˜ κΈ°λŠ₯κ³Ό 역할이 μ»€μ§€λ©΄μ„œ κΈ°κ΄€μž₯μ—κ²Œ μΌμ’…μ˜ μ œμ•½ μš”μΈμ΄ 되고 μžˆλŠ” 상황을 μ„€λͺ…ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•œ κ²ƒμ΄μ—ˆλ‹€. κΈ°κ΄€μž₯의 μœ„μ›νšŒ μ„€μΉ˜ μš΄μ˜μ— λŒ€ν•œ 법적 μ œμ•½μ΄ 맀우 컀지고, μœ„μ›νšŒκ°€ 절차적 μ •λ‹Ήμ„±μ˜ μ „μ œ μš”κ±΄μ΄ λ˜λŠ” κ²½μš°κ°€ λ§Žμ•„μ§€λ©΄μ„œ κΈ°κ΄€μž₯이 μœ„μ›νšŒλ₯Ό μ–΄λ–»κ²Œ μš΄μ˜ν•΄μ•Ό ν•  것인가에 λŒ€ν•œ 고민이 컀지고 μžˆλ‹€κ³  λ³Ό 수 μžˆλŠ” 것이닀. λ”°λΌμ„œ νŠΉμ • λ§₯λ½μ—μ„œ μ‹€κΆŒμžμ˜ 선택을 μ€‘μš”μ‹œν•˜λŠ” μ „λž΅μ  선택이둠을 ν†΅ν•œ μ„€λͺ…이 κ°€λŠ₯ν•  κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ νŒλ‹¨ν•œ 것이닀. 즉, μ˜μ‚¬κ²°μ •κΆŒμžμ— λŒ€ν•˜μ—¬ μœ„μ›νšŒλ₯Ό 효과적으둜 μš΄μ˜ν•˜λ„λ‘ ν•˜λŠ” 논리λ₯Ό μ œκ³΅ν•˜λŠ” μ μ—μ„œ κ·Έ νš¨μš©μ„±μ„ ν™•μΈν•˜μ˜€λ‹€ ν•  것이닀. μœ„μ›νšŒ νŠΉμ„± λ³€μˆ˜λŠ” Child(1972)κ°€ μ œμ‹œν•œ μ „λž΅μ  μ„ νƒμ΄λ‘ μ˜ λ„€ 가지 μΈ‘λ©΄, 쑰직 규λͺ¨, 기술, 쑰직ꡬ쑰, μΈμ μžμ›μ˜ μΈ‘λ©΄μ—μ„œ μ •λΆ€μœ„μ›νšŒ 운영 λ³€μˆ˜λ₯Ό μΆ”μΆœν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 쑰직 규λͺ¨λŠ” μœ„μ› μ •μˆ˜, κΈ°μˆ μ€ μ•žμ„œ λ„μΆœν•œ μ •λΆ€μœ„μ›νšŒ μœ ν˜•, 쑰직 κ΅¬μ‘°λŠ” μœ„μ›μž₯의 μ‹ λΆ„, μΈμ μžμ›μ€ μ‘°μ§ν™”λœ μ΄ν•΄κ΄€κ³„μžμ˜ μ°Έμ—¬ μ—¬λΆ€λ‘œ μΈ‘μ •ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 뢄석결과 μ •λΆ€μœ„μ›νšŒμ˜ νŠΉμ„± λ³€μˆ˜ 쀑 기술적 μš”μΈμΈ μœ„μ›νšŒ μœ ν˜• λ³€μˆ˜κ°€ λ―Όμ£Όν˜• μœ„μ›νšŒμ˜ 경우 μƒμ§•ν˜• μœ„μ›νšŒμ— λΉ„ν•˜μ—¬ κ³„νšμ„±κ³Όκ°€ 더 높은 κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬μœΌλ©°, ν‰κ°€μ„±κ³Όμ—μ„œλ„ λ―Όμ£Όν˜• μœ„μ›νšŒκ°€ μƒμ§•ν˜• μœ„μ›νšŒμ™€ μ „λ¬Έμ§€μ‹ν˜• μœ„μ›νšŒμ— λΉ„ν•˜μ—¬ 더 높은 κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬μœΌλ©°, μ’…ν•©μ„±κ³Ό μ—­μ‹œ λ―Όμ£Όν˜• μœ„μ›νšŒκ°€ μƒμ§•ν˜• μœ„μ›νšŒμ™€ μ „λ¬Έμ§€μ‹ν˜• μœ„μ›νšŒμ— λΉ„ν•˜μ—¬ 더 높은 κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬λ‹€. μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ 뢄석 κ²°κ³Ό μ •λΆ€μœ„μ›νšŒλŠ” 정책을 λŒ€μƒμœΌλ‘œ ν•˜λŠ” 경우 μ •λΆ€μœ„μ› μ΄μ™Έμ˜ λ―Όκ°„μœ„μ›μ˜ μ°Έμ—¬λ₯Ό κ°•ν™”ν•˜λŠ” λ°©μ•ˆμ΄ ν•„μš”ν•˜λ‹€λŠ” μ‹œμ‚¬μ μ„ λ„μΆœν•  수 μžˆμ„ 것이닀. λ‹€λ§Œ, 이외에 기쑴의 μ „λž΅μ  μ„ νƒμ΄λ‘ μ—μ„œ μ œμ•ˆν•˜κ³  μžˆλŠ” 쑰직 ꡬ쑰적 λ³€μˆ˜λ“€μ˜ μ„€λͺ…λ ₯은 그닀지 높지 μ•Šμ€ κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ νŒλ‹¨λ˜μ–΄ μ„ΈλΆ€ λ³€μˆ˜ ꡬ성에 λŒ€ν•œ 좔가적인 λ…Όμ˜κ°€ ν•„μš”ν•  κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ 보인닀.제 1 μž₯ μ„œ λ‘  1 제 1 절 μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ λ°°κ²½ 1 제 2 절 μ—°κ΅¬λ¬Έμ œ 9 제 3 절 μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ λ²”μœ„ 및 데이터 10 제 4 절 λ…Όλ¬Έμ˜ ꡬ성 12 제 2 μž₯ 이둠적 λ…Όμ˜ 13 제 1 절 μ •λΆ€μœ„μ›νšŒμ œλ„μ— κ΄€ν•œ 이둠적 λ…Όμ˜ 13 1. μ •λΆ€μœ„μ›νšŒμ˜ κ°œλ… 13 2. μœ„μ›νšŒμ œλ„μ˜ μž₯단점에 κ΄€ν•œ 연ꡬ 13 3. μ •λΆ€μœ„μ›νšŒμ œλ„ λ„μž… λ°°κ²½ : κ΄€λ£Œμ œ ν•œκ³„μ— λŒ€ν•œ λŒ€μ•ˆμ‘°μ§ ꡬ쑰 17 4. μ •λΆ€μœ„μ›νšŒ 운영 및 성과에 κ΄€ν•œ 연ꡬ 18 제 2 절 정뢀성과에 κ΄€ν•œ 이둠적 λ…Όμ˜ 23 1. μ„±κ³Ό 및 μ„±κ³ΌμΈ‘μ •μ˜ 의의 23 2. 곡곡쑰직의 성과츑정에 κ΄€ν•œ 연ꡬ 25 3. 정책성과와 μ‘°μ§μ„±κ³Όμ˜ 관계에 κ΄€ν•œ 연ꡬ 32 제 3 절 μ •λΆ€μ„±κ³Ό 영ν–₯μš”μΈμ— κ΄€ν•œ 이둠적 λ…Όμ˜ 33 1. μ „λž΅μ  선택이둠 33 2. μžμ›μ˜μ‘΄μ΄λ‘  38 제 3 μž₯ μ •λΆ€μœ„μ›νšŒ μš΄μ˜μ— λŒ€ν•œ 탐색적 연ꡬ 40 제 1 절 ν•œκ΅­μ˜ μ •λΆ€μœ„μ›νšŒμ œλ„ 42 1. 법적 κ·Όκ±° 및 κ·Όκ±°κ·œμ •μ˜ λ³€μ²œ 42 2. μ •λΆ€μœ„μ›νšŒ μœ ν˜• : ν–‰μ •μœ„μ›νšŒμ™€ μžλ¬Έμœ„μ›νšŒ 48 3. μ •κΆŒλ³„ μ •λΆ€μœ„μ›νšŒ μ„€μΉ˜ 및 관리 λ‚΄μš©κ³Ό κ°œν˜λ°©μ•ˆ 52 제 2 절 μ •λΆ€μœ„μ›νšŒ μ¦κ°€ν˜„μƒμ˜ 원인 뢄석 65 1. μ •λΆ€μœ„μ›νšŒ 증가 κ²½ν–₯ 65 2. μ •λΆ€μœ„μ›νšŒ 증가 원인에 λŒ€ν•œ 뢄석 67 3. μ •λΆ€μœ„μ›νšŒ 증가 원인 뢄석 κ²°κ³Ό 84 제 3 절 μ •λΆ€μœ„μ›νšŒ μ„€μΉ˜ λͺ©μ  뢄석 및 μœ ν˜•κ΅¬λΆ„ 90 1. μ •λΆ€μœ„μ›νšŒ μœ ν˜•κ΅¬λΆ„μ— λŒ€ν•œ 이둠적 κ²€ν†  91 2. 싀정법상 μœ ν˜•κ΅¬λΆ„ : ν–‰μ •μœ„μ›νšŒμ™€ μžλ¬Έμœ„μ›νšŒ 98 3. μ •λΆ€μœ„μ›νšŒ μœ ν˜•κ΅¬λΆ„ : μ„€μΉ˜ λͺ©μ  κΈ°μ€€ 102 제 4 절 μ •λΆ€μœ„μ›νšŒ ꡬ성과 운영 뢄석 115 1. μœ„μ› ꡬ성 115 2. μœ„μ›νšŒ 운영 125 제 5 절 μ •λΆ€μœ„μ›νšŒ κ΄€λ ¨ λ³€μˆ˜ λ„μΆœ : 탐색적 연ꡬ 결과에 λŒ€ν•œ μ „λž΅μ  선택이둠 적용 133 1. μ „λž΅μ  μ„ νƒμœΌλ‘œμ„œ μ •λΆ€μœ„μ›νšŒμ˜ 의의 133 2. μ „λž΅μ  선택이둠 적용으둜 μ •λΆ€μœ„μ›νšŒ λ³€μˆ˜ λ„μΆœ 137 제 4 μž₯ μ •λΆ€μœ„μ›νšŒ 운영의 정책성과에 λŒ€ν•œ 영ν–₯λ ₯ 뢄석 140 제 1 절 μ •λΆ€μœ„μ›νšŒ μ—­ν•  강화와 μ •μ±…μ„±κ³Ό κ°„ 관계에 λŒ€ν•œ λ…Όμ˜ 140 1. λ‰΄κ±°λ²„λ„ŒμŠ€(New Governance)이둠과 μ •λΆ€μœ„μ›νšŒμ˜ μ—­ν•  κ°•ν™” 140 2. λ―Όμ£Όλ²•μΉ˜ν–‰μ •κ³Ό μ •λΆ€μœ„μ›νšŒμ˜ μ—­ν•  κ°•ν™” 141 3. μ •λΆ€μœ„μ›νšŒ 운영과 μž¬μ •μ‚¬μ—…μžμœ¨ν‰κ°€ κ²°κ³Ό ν™œμš© 149 4. μ „λž΅μ  선택이둠과 μž¬μ •μ‚¬μ—…μžμœ¨ν‰κ°€λ₯Ό λ°˜μ˜ν•œ μ„€λͺ…λ³€μˆ˜ λ„μΆœ 157 제 2 절 κ°€μ„€μˆ˜λ¦½ 163 1. 쑰직규λͺ¨ 164 2. 운영 기술 : μœ„μ›νšŒ μœ ν˜• 165 3. 쑰직 ꡬ쑰 : μœ„μ›μž₯ μ‹ λΆ„ 166 3. 쑰직 ꡬ쑰 및 μΈμ μžμ› : μ‘°μ§ν™”λœ μ΄ν•΄κ΄€κ³„μž 169 제 3 절 연ꡬ 섀계 173 1. 데이터 173 2. 뢄석 방법 174 3. λ³€μˆ˜μ˜ μ‘°μž‘μ  μ •μ˜ 174 제 4 절 λΆ„ 석 183 1. κΈ°μ΄ˆν†΅κ³„λŸ‰ 뢄석 183 2. νšŒκ·€λΆ„μ„ κ²°κ³Ό 185 3. ν†  λ‘  189 제 5 μž₯ κ²° λ‘  191 제 1 절 μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ 발견 및 학문적 κΈ°μ—¬ 191 1. μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ 발견 191 2. μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ κΈ°μ—¬ 192 제 2 절 μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ ν•œκ³„ 및 ν–₯ν›„ 연ꡬ 과제 195 1. μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ ν•œκ³„ 195 2. ν–₯ν›„ 연ꡬ 과제 197 μ°Έκ³ λ¬Έν—Œ 224 Abstract 237Docto

    μ „λ¬ΈλŒ€ν•™μƒμ˜ ν•™κ΅λ§Œμ‘±λ„ 츑정도ꡬ 개발

    Get PDF
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ (박사)-- μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ λŒ€ν•™μ› : λ†μ‚°μ—…κ΅μœ‘κ³Ό, 2014. 2. μ •μ² μ˜.이 μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ λͺ©μ μ€ μ „λ¬ΈλŒ€ν•™μƒμ˜ ν•™κ΅λ§Œμ‘±λ„ 츑정도ꡬλ₯Ό κ°œλ°œν•˜λŠ”λ° μžˆμ—ˆλ‹€. μ „λ¬ΈλŒ€ν•™μƒμ˜ ν•™κ΅λ§Œμ‘±λ„ 츑정도ꡬ κ°œλ°œμ„ μœ„ν•΄ κ΅¬μ„±μš”μΈ μ„€μ •, λ¬Έν•­κ°œλ°œ, 타당도 및 신뒰도 검증, κ·œμ€€ 개발 λ“±μ˜ λ„€ 가지 단계에 따라 연ꡬλ₯Ό μ‹€μ‹œν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. κ΅¬μ„±μš”μΈ μ„€μ •λ‹¨κ³„μ—μ„œλŠ” 선행연ꡬ 고찰을 ν† λŒ€λ‘œ μ „λ¬ΈλŒ€ν•™μƒμ˜ ν•™κ΅λ§Œμ‘±λ„μ˜ ꡬ인화 λͺ¨ν˜•μ„ μž μ •μ μœΌλ‘œ μ„€μ •ν•˜κ³ , 델파이 기법을 ν™œμš©ν•˜μ—¬ 타당도λ₯Ό κ²€μ¦ν•˜κ³  ꡬ인화 λͺ¨ν˜•μ„ μˆ˜μ • 및 λ³΄μ™„ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. κ·Έ κ²°κ³Ό μ΅œμ’…μ μœΌλ‘œ μ „λ¬ΈλŒ€ν•™μƒμ˜ ν•™κ΅λ§Œμ‘±λ„ μ˜μ—­μ„ ꡐ윑 지원, μ§„λ‘œ 및 μ·¨μ—… 지원, ν–‰μ • 지원, 물리적 ν™˜κ²½ μ§€μ›μœΌλ‘œ κ΅¬λΆ„ν•˜κ³ , ꡐ윑 지원 μ˜μ—­μ—λŠ” κ΅μœ‘κ³Όμ •, μˆ˜μ—…, ꡐ수의 3개 ν•˜μœ„μ˜μ—­μ„, μ§„λ‘œ 및 μ·¨μ—… 지원 μ˜μ—­μ—λŠ” μ§„λ‘œ ν”„λ‘œκ·Έλž¨ 및 μ§„λ‘œ 상담, μ·¨μ—… ν”„λ‘œκ·Έλž¨ 및 μ·¨μ—… μ •λ³΄μ˜ 2개 ν•˜μœ„μ˜μ—­μ„, ν–‰μ • 지원 μ˜μ—­μ—λŠ” 학사행정, 직원 및 쑰ꡐ의 2개 ν•˜μœ„μ˜μ—­μ„, 물리적 ν™˜κ²½ μ˜μ—­μ—λŠ” ꡐ윑 μ‹œμ„€ 및 기자재, 캠퍼슀 ν™˜κ²½μ˜ 2개 ν•˜μœ„μ˜μ—­μ„ μ„€μ •ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. λ¬Έν•­κ°œλ°œ λ‹¨κ³„μ—μ„œλŠ” μ „λ¬ΈλŒ€ν•™μƒμ˜ ν•™κ΅λ§Œμ‘±λ„μ˜ ν•˜μœ„μ˜μ—­μ— λŒ€ν•œ κ°œλ… μ •μ˜μ™€ κ΄€λ ¨ 선행연ꡬ κ²°κ³Όλ₯Ό ν† λŒ€λ‘œ 55개 문항을 κ°œλ°œν•˜μ˜€μœΌλ©°, 1차적으둜 μ „λ¬Έκ°€ κ²€ν† λ₯Ό ν†΅ν•˜μ—¬ 54개 문항이 κ°œλ°œλ˜μ—ˆμœΌλ©°, 2μ°¨ λ‚΄μš©νƒ€λ‹Ήλ„ 검증을 ν†΅ν•˜μ—¬ 문항을 μˆ˜μ • λ˜λŠ” μ œκ±°ν•˜μ—¬ 51개 문항이 μ˜ˆλΉ„μ‘°μ‚¬ λ„κ΅¬λ‘œ κ°œλ°œλ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. 타당도 및 신뒰도 검증 λ‹¨κ³„μ—μ„œλŠ” μ˜ˆλΉ„μ‘°μ‚¬μ™€ 본쑰사λ₯Ό μ‹€μ‹œν•˜μ—¬ μΈ‘μ •λ„κ΅¬μ˜ 타당도와 신뒰도λ₯Ό κ²€μ¦ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. λ¨Όμ € μ˜ˆλΉ„μ‘°μ‚¬μ—μ„œλŠ” μ „λ¬ΈλŒ€ν•™μƒ 480λͺ…을 λŒ€μƒμœΌλ‘œ 자료λ₯Ό μˆ˜μ§‘ν•˜μ—¬ 문항뢄석, 신뒰도 뢄석, μš”μΈλΆ„μ„μ„ μ‹€μ‹œν•˜μ˜€μœΌλ©°, 이λ₯Ό 톡해 총 45개 λ¬Έν•­μœΌλ‘œ κ΅¬μ„±λœ λ³Έμ‘°μ‚¬μš© 츑정도ꡬλ₯Ό ν™•μ •ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. λ³Έμ‘°μ‚¬μ—μ„œλŠ” μ „λ¬ΈλŒ€ν•™μƒ 23,520λͺ…을 λŒ€μƒμœΌλ‘œ 자료λ₯Ό μˆ˜μ§‘ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. μ „λ¬ΈλŒ€ν•™μƒμ˜ ν•™κ΅λ§Œμ‘±λ„ μΈ‘μ •λ„κ΅¬μ˜ 신뒰도와 타당도λ₯Ό κ²€μ¦ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•˜μ—¬ λ¬Έν•­λ‚΄μ μΌμΉ˜λ„ κ³„μˆ˜λ₯Ό μ‚°μΆœν•˜μ˜€κ³ , 탐색적·확인적 μš”μΈλΆ„μ„μ„ μ‹€μ‹œν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. κ·œμ€€ 개발 λ‹¨κ³„μ—μ„œλŠ” μΈ‘μ •κ²°κ³Όμ˜ 해석을 보닀 μš©μ΄ν•˜κ²Œ ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•˜μ—¬ 집단별 κ·œμ€€μ„ μ œμ‹œν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 이λ₯Ό μœ„ν•΄ λ¨Όμ € 집단 κ°„ 차이 검증을 μ‹€μ‹œν•˜μ˜€μœΌλ©°, κ·Έ κ²°κ³Όλ₯Ό ν† λŒ€λ‘œ 성별(남성, μ—¬μ„±), 학년별(1ν•™λ…„, 2ν•™λ…„, 3ν•™λ…„), 계열별(μΈλ¬Έμ‚¬νšŒκ³„μ—΄, μžμ—°κ³Όν•™κ³„μ—΄, 곡학계열, 예체λŠ₯계열), 지역별(λŒ€λ„μ‹œ, μ€‘μ†Œλ„μ‹œ) κ·œμ€€μ„ μž‘μ„±ν•˜μ˜€μœΌλ©°, μ΄λ•Œ κ·œμ€€μ μˆ˜λ‘œλŠ” λ°±λΆ„μœ„ μ μˆ˜μ™€ ν‘œμ€€μ μˆ˜(T점수)λ₯Ό ν™œμš©ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 본쑰사 μ‹€μ‹œ κ²°κ³Όλ₯Ό ν† λŒ€λ‘œ 이 μ—°κ΅¬μ—μ„œ 얻어진 ꡬ체적인 κ²°κ³Όλ₯Ό μ œμ‹œν•˜λ©΄ λ‹€μŒκ³Ό κ°™λ‹€. λ¬Έν•­λ‚΄μ μΌμΉ˜λ„ κ³„μˆ˜ μ‚°μΆœμ„ 톡해 이루어진 신뒰도 뢄석은 α값이 ꡐ윑 지원 μ˜μ—­μ€ .957, μ§„λ‘œ 및 μ·¨μ—… 지원 μ˜μ—­μ€ .960, ν–‰μ • 지원 μ˜μ—­μ€ .936, 물리적 ν™˜κ²½ 지원 μ˜μ—­μ€ .925둜 λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬μœΌλ©°, μΈ‘μ •λ„κ΅¬μ˜ 전체 μ‹ λ’°λ„λŠ” .976으둜 λ¬Έν•­μ˜ λ™μ§ˆμ„±μ΄ μƒλ‹Ήνžˆ 높은 κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬λ‹€. λ‹€μŒμœΌλ‘œ 탐색적 μš”μΈλΆ„μ„μ„ ν†΅ν•˜μ—¬ κ΅μœ‘κ³Όμ •, μˆ˜μ—…, ꡐ수, μ§„λ‘œ ν”„λ‘œκ·Έλž¨, μ§„λ‘œ 상담, μ·¨μ—… ν”„λ‘œκ·Έλž¨ 및 μ·¨μ—… 정보, 학사행정, 직원 및 쑰ꡐ, ꡐ윑 μ‹œμ„€ 및 기자재, 캠퍼슀 ν™˜κ²½μ˜ 9가지 ν•˜μœ„μ˜μ—­μ΄ μ„œλ‘œ λ‹€λ₯Έ μš”μΈμœΌλ‘œ λ¬Άμ—¬ μ „λ¬ΈλŒ€ν•™μƒμ˜ ν•™κ΅λ§Œμ‘±λ„λ₯Ό μ„€λͺ…ν•˜κ³  μžˆλŠ” κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬λ‹€. 그리고 확인적 μš”μΈλΆ„μ„μ„ ν†΅ν•˜μ—¬ μ „λ¬ΈλŒ€ν•™μƒμ˜ ν•™κ΅λ§Œμ‘±λ„λŠ” ꡐ윑 지원, μ§„λ‘œ 및 μ·¨μ—… 지원, ν–‰μ • 지원, 물리적 ν™˜κ²½ μ§€μ›μœΌλ‘œ κ΅¬λΆ„λ˜κ³ , ꡐ윑 μ§€μ›μ—λŠ” κ΅μœ‘κ³Όμ •, μˆ˜μ—…, ꡐ수 ꡬ인이, μ§„λ‘œ 및 μ·¨μ—… μ§€μ›μ—λŠ” μ§„λ‘œ ν”„λ‘œκ·Έλž¨ 및 μ§„λ‘œ 상담, μ·¨μ—… ν”„λ‘œκ·Έλž¨ 및 μ·¨μ—… 정보 ꡬ인이, ν–‰μ • μ§€μ›μ—λŠ” 학사행정, 직원 및 쑰ꡐ ꡬ인이, 물리적 ν™˜κ²½ μ§€μ›μ—λŠ” ꡐ윑 μ‹œμ„€ 및 기자재, 캠퍼슀 ν™˜κ²½ ꡬ인이 μ‘΄μž¬ν•¨μ„ 확인할 수 μžˆμ—ˆλ‹€. 이와 같은 연ꡬ κ²°κ³Όλ₯Ό ν† λŒ€λ‘œ 후속 μ—°κ΅¬λ‘œμ„œ (1) 개발된 츑정도ꡬ와 κ΄€λ ¨ 도ꡬ 및 λ³€μΈκ³Όμ˜ 지속적인 타당화 연ꡬ, (2) μ „λ¬ΈλŒ€ν•™μƒμ˜ ν•™κ΅λ§Œμ‘±λ„ μΈ‘μ •λ„κ΅¬μ˜ 보닀 λͺ…ν™•ν•œ μš”μΈκ΅¬μ‘° ν˜•μ„±μ„ μœ„ν•œ 후속 연ꡬ, (3) μ˜ˆμ–Ένƒ€λ‹Ήλ„ 검증을 μœ„ν•œ 관계 연ꡬ, (4) μΈ‘μ •κ²°κ³Όμ˜ 보닀 ν’λΆ€ν•œ 해석을 μœ„ν•œ λ§Œμ‘±λ„ νŠΉμ„± 개발 등을 μ œμ•ˆν•˜μ˜€λ‹€.I. μ„œλ‘  1 1. μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ ν•„μš”μ„± 1 2. μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ λͺ©μ  6 3. μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ 문제 6 4. μš©μ–΄μ˜ μ •μ˜ 6 II. 이둠적 λ°°κ²½ 9 1. μ „λ¬ΈλŒ€ν•™μ˜ ν˜„ν™©κ³Ό μ „λ¬ΈλŒ€ν•™μƒμ˜ νŠΉμ„± 9 2. μ „λ¬ΈλŒ€ν•™μƒμ˜ ν•™κ΅λ§Œμ‘±μ˜ 의의 19 3. μ „λ¬ΈλŒ€ν•™μƒμ˜ ν•™κ΅λ§Œμ‘±λ„ μ˜μ—­ 34 4. 츑정도ꡬ 개발 절차 86 III. μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ 절차 및 방법 93 1. κ΅¬μ„±μš”μΈ μ„€μ • 94 2. λ¬Έν•­κ°œλ°œ 100 3. 타당도 및 신뒰도 검증 104 4. κ·œμ€€ 개발 110 IV. μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ κ²°κ³Ό 113 1. μ „λ¬ΈλŒ€ν•™μƒμ˜ ν•™κ΅λ§Œμ‘±λ„ κ΅¬μ„±μš”μΈ μ„€μ • 113 2. μ „λ¬ΈλŒ€ν•™μƒμ˜ ν•™κ΅λ§Œμ‘±λ„ μΈ‘μ •λ„κ΅¬μ˜ λ¬Έν•­ 개발 122 3. μ „λ¬ΈλŒ€ν•™μƒμ˜ ν•™κ΅λ§Œμ‘±λ„ μΈ‘μ •λ„κ΅¬μ˜ 타당도 및 신뒰도 검증 128 4. μ „λ¬ΈλŒ€ν•™μƒμ˜ ν•™κ΅λ§Œμ‘±λ„ μΈ‘μ •λ„κ΅¬μ˜ κ·œμ€€ 개발 153 V. μš”μ•½, κ²°λ‘  및 μ œμ–Έ 167 1. μš”μ•½ 167 2. κ²°λ‘  170 3. μ œμ–Έ 172 μ°Έ κ³  λ¬Έ ν—Œ 173 뢀둝 183 1. μ „λ¬ΈλŒ€ν•™μƒμ˜ ν•™κ΅λ§Œμ‘±λ„ 츑정도ꡬ λ¬Έν•­ κ°œλ°œμ„ μœ„ν•œ 심측면담 μ°Έμ—¬ λ™μ˜μ„œ 183 2. μ „λ¬ΈλŒ€ν•™μƒμ˜ ν•™κ΅λ§Œμ‘±λ„ 츑정도ꡬ λ¬Έν•­ κ°œλ°œμ„ μœ„ν•œ 면담지 184 3. 델파이 μžλ¬Έμœ„μ› μŠΉλ‚™μ„œ 185 4. 1μ°¨ 델파이 쑰사λ₯Ό μœ„ν•œ 섀문지 186 5. 2μ°¨ 델파이 쑰사λ₯Ό μœ„ν•œ 섀문지 193 6. μ „λ¬ΈλŒ€ν•™μƒμ˜ ν•™κ΅λ§Œμ‘±λ„ μΈ‘μ •λ„κ΅¬μ˜ λ‚΄μš©νƒ€λ‹Ήλ„ 검증을 μœ„ν•œ 섀문지 203 7. μ „λ¬ΈλŒ€ν•™μƒμ˜ ν•™κ΅λ§Œμ‘±λ„ 츑정도ꡬ κ°œλ°œμ„ μœ„ν•œ λ‚΄μš©νƒ€λ‹Ήλ„ 검증을 μœ„ν•œ 섀문지 뢄석 κ²°κ³Ό 208 8. μ˜ˆλΉ„μ‘°μ‚¬λ₯Ό μœ„ν•œ μ „λ¬ΈλŒ€ν•™μƒμ˜ ν•™κ΅λ§Œμ‘±λ„ 츑정도ꡬ 210 9. μ˜ˆλΉ„μ‘°μ‚¬μ˜ 1μ°¨ μš”μΈλΆ„μ„ κ²°κ³Ό 214 10. μ˜ˆλΉ„μ‘°μ‚¬μ˜ 2μ°¨ μš”μΈλΆ„μ„ κ²°κ³Ό 216 11. μ „λ¬ΈλŒ€ν•™μƒμ˜ ν•™κ΅λ§Œμ‘±λ„ 츑정도ꡬ(λ³Έμ‘°μ‚¬μš©) 218 12. μ „λ¬ΈλŒ€ν•™μƒμ˜ ν•™κ΅λ§Œμ‘±λ„ μΈ‘μ •λ„κ΅¬μ˜ μ΅œμ’… κ°œλ°œμ•ˆ 223 13. μ „λ¬ΈλŒ€ν•™μƒμ˜ ν•™κ΅λ§Œμ‘±λ„ μΈ‘μ •λ„κ΅¬μ˜ 집단별 κ·œμ€€ 229Docto

    (A) study on the development of the statistical information system on health and welfare based on the Enterprise Information Portal (EIP) approach. : 보건볡

    No full text
    보건정보관리학과/석사[ν•œκΈ€] ꡭ민의 γ€Œμ‚Άμ˜ μ§ˆγ€ν–₯상을 μœ„ν•΄μ„œλŠ” κ΅­κ°€μ˜ 합리적이고 효율적인 보건볡지 μ •μ±…μ˜ 수립이 무엇보닀도 μ€‘μš”ν•˜λ‹€ ν•  수 있으며, μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ κ΅­κ°€ μ •μ±…μ˜ νš¨μœ¨μ„± 확보λ₯Ό μœ„ν•œ 기초적인 역할을 ν•˜λŠ” 것이 톡계이닀. 보건볡지뢀 λ˜ν•œ 맀우 κ΄‘λ²”μœ„ν•œ λΆ„μ•Όμ˜ 업무λ₯Ό μˆ˜ν–‰ν•˜κ³  있으며, 점차 λ‹€μ–‘ν™”λ˜μ–΄ κ°€λŠ” λ³΄κ±΄λ³΅μ§€μ‚¬μ—…μ˜ 효율적인 좔진을 μœ„ν•΄μ„œλŠ” 각 μ‚¬μ—…λΆ„μ•Όμ—μ„œ ν•„μš”λ‘œ ν•˜λŠ” 톡계정보λ₯Ό μ‹ μ†ν•˜κ³  νŽΈλ¦¬ν•˜κ²Œ ν™œμš©ν•  수 μžˆλŠ” μƒˆλ‘œμš΄ μ •λ³΄μ‹œμŠ€ν…œμ΄ μš”κ΅¬λ˜μ–΄ 진닀. λ”°λΌμ„œ, λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” 보건볡지 톡계정보 ꡬ좕 및 ν™œμ„±ν™”λ₯Ό μœ„ν•˜μ—¬ EIP의 κ°œλ…μ„ 보건볡지 톡계뢄야에 μ μš©ν•œ ν†΅κ³„μ •λ³΄ν¬νƒˆμ˜ λͺ¨ν˜•μ„ κ΅¬ν˜„ν•΄λ΄„μœΌλ‘œμ¨, 효율적인 보건볡지정책 μˆ˜λ¦½μ„ μ§€μ›ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•œ λ³΄κ±΄λ³΅μ§€λΆ€μ˜ EIP ꡬ좕 μ „λž΅μ„ μ œμ‹œν•˜κ³ μž ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 보건볡지와 κ΄€λ ¨ν•œ ν†΅κ³„μ •λ³΄μ˜ μƒμ‚°ν˜„ν™©κ³Ό κ΄€λ ¨ μ •λ³΄μ‹œμŠ€ν…œμ„ λΆ„μ„ν•˜μ—¬ ν˜„ μ‹œμŠ€ν…œμ„ ν‰κ°€ν•˜κ³ , μ‚¬μš©μž μš”κ΅¬λΆ„μ„μ„ ν†΅ν•˜μ—¬ μ—…λ¬΄λ‹΄λ‹Ήμžκ°€ ν•„μš”ν•œ 톡계정보λ₯Ό ν•˜λ‚˜μ˜ ν¬νƒˆν™”λ©΄μ—μ„œ κ²€μƒ‰ν•˜κ³  ν™œμš©ν•  수 μžˆλŠ” EIP κ°œλ…μ˜ ν†΅κ³„μ •λ³΄ν¬νƒˆμ— λͺ¨ν˜•μ„ μ œμ‹œν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. λ˜ν•œ, κ΅¬μΆ•λœ λͺ¨ν˜•μ„ μ‚¬μš©μžκ΄€μ κ³Ό λ°μ΄ν„°λ² μ΄μŠ€κ΄€μ  λ“±μ—μ„œ κΈ°μ‘΄ μ‹œμŠ€ν…œκ³Ό λΉ„κ΅ν•˜μ—¬ μ œμ‹œν•¨μœΌλ‘œμ¨, ν†΅κ³„μ •λ³΄μ˜ ν™œμš©λ°©μ•ˆκ³Ό EIP λ„μž… ν•„μš”μ„±μ„ μ œμ‹œν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. μ œμ‹œλœ ν†΅κ³„μ •λ³΄ν¬νƒˆμ˜ λͺ¨ν˜•μ€ κ΅¬μΆ•λœ ν†΅κ³„μ •λ³΄μ˜ 효율적 μ‚¬μš©λ°©μ•ˆκ³Ό ν–₯ν›„ 전체 업무 및 μ‹œμŠ€ν…œμ„ λŒ€μƒμœΌλ‘œ ν•œ EIP λ„μž…μ‹œ μ„ ν–‰μ—°κ΅¬λ‘œ ν™œμš©λ  수 μžˆμ„ 것이닀. [영문] In order to improve "Quality of Life" of the people, there is a need to develop rational and effective policies for health and welfare based on accurate and timely statistics. The Ministry of Health and Welfare (MOHW) is carrying out a wide-range of policies and projects. To provide necessary statistics to support these policies, there is a need for an effective information system that collects and produces key statistics for health and welfare policies in a timely manner.// This paper presented a model for a web-based statistical information system based on the Enterprise Information Portal (EIP) approach. Specifically, we presented the concept of EIP as well as the model system by expanding the existing statistical system using EIP approach. Distinct feature of this approach is that a number of portal sites are integrated in one system and therefore user can access a variety of statistics from a single screen. In this study, we selected one department, as a case study, and developed sample screens based on the user information requirements obtained by systems analysis. While there were several studies on statistical information system in public sector, most of them have only focused on the need for user friendly such system, rather than presenting a detailed description of the system. The EIP statistical information system and work classification system presented in this paper can be used as a model for developing an actual statistical information system at MOHW in the future.ope

    The Difference of Members Policy Concern and Influence in Mixed Electoral System

    No full text
    이 μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ λͺ©μ μ€ ν•œκ΅­μ˜ ν˜Όν•©ν˜• μ„ κ±°μ œλ„μ— μ£Όλͺ©ν•˜μ—¬, μ†Œμ„ κ±°κ΅¬μ œμ— μ˜ν•΄ μ„ μΆœλœ 지역ꡬ μ˜μ›κ³Ό μ •λ‹Ήλͺ…뢀식 λΉ„λ‘€λŒ€ν‘œμ œμ˜ μ˜ν•΄ μ„ μΆœλœ λΉ„λ‘€λŒ€ν‘œ μ˜μ›μ΄ 정책적 관심과 μ •μ±…μ˜ν–₯λ ₯에 차이λ₯Ό λ³΄μ΄λŠ”μ§€λ₯Ό λΆ„μ„ν•˜λŠ” 것이닀. λ‹¨μˆœλ‹€μˆ˜ μ†Œμ„ κ±°κ΅¬μ œμ— μ˜ν•΄ μ„ μΆœλœ 지역ꡬ μ˜μ›μ€ κ°•ν•œ 지역적 연계와 μ„ κ±°μ±…μž„μ„±μ„ κ°–κΈ° λ•Œλ¬Έμ— λΉ„λ‘€λŒ€ν‘œ μ˜μ›κ³Ό 차별적인 정책관심과 영ν–₯λ ₯을 보일 κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ κΈ°λŒ€λœλ‹€. λΆ„μ„λŒ€μƒμ€ 제18λŒ€ κ΅­νšŒμ—μ„œ 발의된 1만1191건의 μ˜μ›μ•ˆμ΄λ‹€. μ˜μ›μ•ˆμ€ 총 15개의 μ •μ±…λΆ„μ•Όλ‘œ λΆ„λ₯˜λ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. κ΅­νšŒμ˜μ›μ˜ 정책적관심은 λ²•μ•ˆλ°œμ˜λ₯Ό ν†΅ν•΄μ„œ, μ •μ±…μ˜ν–₯λ ₯은 λ²•μ•ˆκ°€κ²°κ³Ό λŒ€μ•ˆλ°˜μ˜νκΈ°λ₯Ό ν†΅ν•΄μ„œ νŒŒμ•…ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. λΆ„μ„κ²°κ³ΌλŠ” λ‹€μŒκ³Ό κ°™λ‹€. 첫째, 지역ꡬ μ˜μ›μ΄ λΉ„λ‘€λŒ€ν‘œ μ˜μ›λ³΄λ‹€ μƒλŒ€μ μœΌλ‘œ 높은 정책관심을 보인 λΆ„μ•ΌλŠ” λ†λ¦Όμˆ˜μ‚°μ •μ±…, κ΅­ν† κ°œλ°œμ •μ±…, μ‘°μ„Έμž¬μ •μ •μ±…μœΌλ‘œ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬λ‹€. 여기에 ν•΄λ‹Ήλ˜λŠ” λ²•μ•ˆλ“€μ€ μžμ›κ³Ό μ˜ˆμ‚°μ˜ 뢄배와 κ΄€λ ¨λœ λΆ„λ°°μ •μ±…(distributive policy) μœ ν˜•μ— μ†ν•˜λ©°, μ˜μ›μ˜ μ§€μ—­κ΅¬μ„ μ‹¬μ •μΉ˜(pork barrel politics)에 μœ λ¦¬ν•œ μ •μ±…λΆ„μ•ΌλΌλŠ” 곡톡점을 κ°–λŠ”λ‹€. λ‘˜μ§Έ, λΉ„λ‘€λŒ€ν‘œ μ˜μ›μ€ μ—¬μ„±κ°€μ‘±μ •μ±…, 보건볡지정책, 노동정책 λ“±μ—μ„œ μƒλŒ€μ μœΌλ‘œ 높은 관심을 λ³΄μ˜€λ‹€. μ΄λŠ” μ—¬μ„±μ΄λ‚˜ λ…Έλ™μž λ“± κ΄‘λ²”μœ„ν•œ 인ꡬ집단을 μ •μ±…λŒ€μƒμœΌλ‘œ ν•˜λ©°, 볡지정책적 성격을 κ°•ν•˜κ²Œ λ λŠ” μ •μ±…λΆ„μ•ΌλΌλŠ” νŠΉμ§•μ„ κ°–λŠ”λ‹€. μ…‹μ§Έ, λ†λ¦Όμˆ˜μ‚°μ •μ±…κ³Ό κ΅­ν† κ°œλ°œ μ •μ±…μ˜ κ²°μ •κ³Όμ •μ—μ„œ 지역ꡬ μ˜μ›μ€ λΉ„λ‘€λŒ€ν‘œ μ˜μ›λ³΄λ‹€ μƒλŒ€μ μœΌλ‘œ 큰 영ν–₯λ ₯을 ν–‰μ‚¬ν•˜λŠ” κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬λ‹€. 특히 λ†λ¦Όμˆ˜μ‚°μ •μ±…μ˜ κ²½μš°μ—λŠ” 지역ꡬ μ˜μ›μ˜ μ •μ±…μ˜ν–₯λ ₯이 ν†΅κ³„μ μœΌλ‘œλ„ μž…μ¦λ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. 이 μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” νŠΉμ • μ •μ±…λΆ„μ•Όμ—μ„œλŠ” κ΅­νšŒμ˜μ›μ˜ λŒ€ν‘œμœ ν˜•μ΄ μ˜μ •ν™œλ™μ— 영ν–₯을 λ―ΈμΉ˜λŠ” μœ μ˜λ―Έν•œ λ³€μˆ˜μž„μ„ μž…μ¦ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€λŠ” μ μ—μ„œ 의의λ₯Ό 찾을 수 μžˆλ‹€.The purpose of this study, which is focused on Koreas mixed electoral system, is to analyze the difference of policy activity between members elected by the single-member district (SMD) and the Members elected by the party list of proportional representation (PR). Because Members from SMD have strong local connections and representational accountability, they are expected to have greater incentives for pork barrel legislation than proportional representatives. The data for analysis was from the 11,191 cases of members proposals from the 18th National Assembly. The legislative proposals were classified into a total of 15 policy areas. Policy concerns of the members of the National Assembly are reflected through bill proposals and policy influence is reflected in passed bills. The results are as follows. Firstly, Members fro SMD show greater interest in the fields of agriculture, forestry and fisheries policies, land development policy and taxation and fiscal policy than PR Members. The bills that are in those fields are classified as distributive policies, which relates to the distribution of resources and the budget. These policy area are beneficial to Members reelection. Secondly, proportional representatives showed a relatively high level of interest in women and family policy, health and welfare policy, labor policy and others. They target an extensive range of population groups, including women and workers, and are especially in charge of welfare policy. Thirdly, in agriculture, forestry and fisheries policies and land development policies, Members from SMD showed significantly greater policy influence than proportional representatives. In particular, the policy influence of Members from SMD in agriculture, forestry and fisheries policies is statistically confirmed. This study has proven meaningful by confirming that in certain policy fields, representative type among National Assembly members can influence their legislative activity
    corecore