経済成長と所得分配 : ポスト・ケインジアンのアプローチ

1 はじめに 2 ポスト･ケインジアンの成長と分配のモデル 3 ネオ･ケインジアンとカレツキアン 4 現代マクロ経済学の流れのなかで 5 おわりにMade available in DSpace on 2012-09-05T00:45:52Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 ikeda1.pdf: 14546134 bytes, checksum: 2d9bf3609b7424a91c413c1db854eb28 (MD5) ikeda2.pdf: 9086160 bytes, checksum: 783ef4eb9ae2334c8dfbe886c10b9768 (MD5) ikeda3.pdf: 16773563 bytes, checksum: 81eba276febe56149b2da903f4cd1910 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2000-03-2

A Theory of Price,Capital Acquisition and Distribution by Toshihiro Kanao

論

The Incompleteness of Contracts in Feudal Corporate Governance Structures of Korean Chaebols : The Establishment of an Incomplete Contract Market Accompanying the Market-oriented System “Transplantation”

application/pdfToday, in the name of “Globalization” attempts at “Institutional Transplantation” are beingforcibly pursued without taking into account any cultural, organizational, or cognitive models of the target countries. Therefore, suppliers in the target countries of “Transplant” are strengthening their presence by taking advantage of the environmental effects they bring. In doing so, institutional elements inherited from the past correlated with Marketism, and the resulting imperfection of contracts led producers in the “Transplanted Countries” to return to traditionalist feudalism, thus prompting despotic incentives. The permeation of market-based capitalism strengthened the market system through its own exogenous transplantation, but in response, it also strengthened the market manipulation functions of management within corporate organizations. By applying and developing the perspective of institutional economics, this paper has clarified that “institutional complementarity” in regulation theory is established in the corporate governance structure of Korean conglomerates. Such “Institutional Complementarity” does not mean an equal complementarity between various institutions, but is based on “Institutional Hierarchy,” which is the dominant determinant of lower-ranking institutions by higher-ranking institutions. The analysis method corresponds to the “Mezzo Level” of institutional analysis, which consists of interdependent relationships between corporate organizations. I focused on the area that lies between the actors and the macroeconomic dynamics. In this way, the spread of market-based capitalism brought about by globalization strengthens the market system through its own exogenous transplantation. At the same time, it also brought about the incompleteness of the contract, which strengthened the general authoritarian “Productivity Regime” of the Korean chaebol.departmental bulletin pape

タイトル：カレツキアン・モデルの基本骨格――短期モデルと長期モデル――

This study explains the basic framework of the short-run Kaleckian model and the long-run Kaleckian model. The short-run Kaleckian model is a model in which the rate of capacity utilization is adjusted in response to excess demand and excess supply of the goods market with given capital stock. The long-run Kaleckian model is a model in which capital stock is adjusted in response to the difference between the desired rate of capital accumulation and the actual rate of capital accumulation. Moreover, we endogenize the profit share by introducing the reserve-army effect. By adding different elements to these basic Kaleckian models, one can build an extended Kaleckian model according to his/her purpose