A ZK-SNARK based Proof of Assets Protocol for Bitcoin Exchanges

This paper proposes a protocol for Proof of Assets of a bitcoin exchange using the Zero-Knowledge Succinct Non-Interactive Argument of Knowledge (ZK-SNARK) without revealing either the bitcoin addresses of the exchange or balances associated with those addresses. The proof of assets is a mechanism to prove the total value of bitcoins the exchange has authority to spend using its private keys. We construct a privacy-preserving ZK-SNARK proof system to prove the knowledge of the private keys corresponding to the bitcoin assets of an exchange. The ZK-SNARK tool-chain helps to convert an NP-Statement for proving the knowledge of the private keys (known to the exchange) into a circuit satisfiability problem. In this protocol, the exchange creates a Pedersen commitment to the value of bitcoins associated with each address without revealing the balance. The simulation results show that the proof generation time, size, and verification time are efficient in practice.Comment: 9 pages, 2 figures, 6 table

PlonKup: Reconciling PlonK with plookup

In 2019, Gabizon, Williamson, and Ciobotaru introduced PlonK – a fast and flexible ZK-SNARK with an updatable and universal structured reference string. PlonK uses a grand product argument to check permutations of wire values, and exploits convenient interactions between multiplicative subgroups and Lagrange bases. The following year, Gabizon and Williamson used similar techniques to develop plookup – a ZK-SNARK that can verify that each element from a list of queries can be found in a public lookup table. In this paper, we present PlonKup, a fully succinct ZK-SNARK that integrates the ideas from plookup into PlonK in an efficient way

The Referendum Problem in Anonymous Voting for Decentralized Autonomous Organizations

A natural approach to anonymous voting over Ethereum assumes that there is an off-chain aggregator that performs the following task. The aggregator receives valid signatures of YES/NO preferences from eligible voters and uses them to compute a zk-SNARK proof of the fact that the majority of voters have cast a preference for YES or NO. Then, the aggregator sends to the smart contract the zk-SNARK proof, the smart contract verifies the proof and can trigger an action (e.g., a transfer of funds). As the zk-SNARK proof guarantees anonymity, the privacy of the voters is preserved by attackers not colluding with the aggregator. Moreover, if the SNARK proof verification is efficient the GAS cost will be independent on the number of participating voters and signatures submitted by voters to the aggregator. In this paper we show that this naive approach to run referenda over Ethereum can incur severe security problems. We propose both mitigations and hardness results for achieving voting procedures in which the proofs submitted on-chain are either ZK or succinct

UC-Secure CRS Generation for SNARKs

Zero-knowledge SNARKs (zk-SNARKs) have recently found various applications in verifiable computation and blockchain applications (Zerocash), but unfortunately they rely on a common reference string (CRS) that has to be generated by a trusted party. A standard suggestion, pursued by Ben Sasson et al. [IEEE S&P, 2015], is to generate CRS via a multi-party protocol. We enhance their CRS-generation protocol to achieve UC-security. This allows to safely compose the CRS-generation protocol with the zk-SNARK in a black-box manner with the insurance that the security of the zk-SNARK is not influenced. Differently from the previous work, the new CRS-generation protocol also avoids the random oracle model which is typically not required by zk-SNARKs themselves. As a case study, we apply the protocol to the state-of-the-art zk-SNARK by Groth [EUROCRYPT, 2016]

Fast and Designated-verifier Friendly zkSNARKs in the BPK Model

After the pioneering results proposed by Bellare et al in ASIACRYPT 2016, there have been lots of efforts to construct zero-knowledge succinct non-interactive arguments of knowledge protocols (zk-SNARKs) that satisfy subversion zero knowledge (S-ZK) and standard soundness from the zk-SNARK in the common reference string (CRS) model. The various constructions could be regarded secure in the bare public key (BPK) model because of the equivalence between S-ZK in the CRS model, and uniform non-black-box zero knowledge in the BPK model has been proved by Abdolmaleki et al. in PKC 2020. In this study, by leveraging the power of random oracle (RO) model, we proposed the first publicly verifiable non-uniform ZK zk-SNARK scheme in the BPK model maintaining comparable efficiency with its conventional counterpart, which can also be compatible with the well-known transformation proposed by Bitansky et al. in TCC 2013 to obtain an efficient designated-verifier zk-SNARK. We achieve this goal by only adding a constant number of elements into the CRS, and using an unconventional but natural method to transform Groth’s zk-SNARK in EUROCRYPT 2016. In addition, we propose a new speed-up technique that provides a trade-off. Specifically, if a logarithmic number of elements are added into the CRS, according to different circuits, the CRS verification time in our construction could be approximately $9\%-23\%$ shorter than that in the conventional counterpart

Usalduse vähendamine ja turvalisuse parandamine zk-SNARK-ides ja kinnitusskeemides

Väitekirja elektrooniline versioon ei sisalda publikatsioonezk-SNARK-id on tõhusad ja praktilised mitteinteraktiivsed tõestussüsteemid, mis on konstrueeritud viitestringi mudelis ning tänu kompaktsetele tõestustele ja väga tõhusale verifitseeritavusele on need laialdaselt kasutusele võetud suuremahulistes praktilistes rakendustes. Selles töös uurime zk-SNARK-e kahest vaatenurgast: nende usalduse vähendamine ja turvalisuse tugevdamine. Esimeses suunas uurime kui palju saab vähendada usaldust paaristuspõhiste zk-SNARK-ide puhul ilma nende tõhusust ohverdamata niiviisi, et kasutajad saavad teatud turvataseme ka siis kui seadistusfaas tehti pahatahtlikult või kui avalikustati seadistusfaasi salajane teave. Me pakume välja mõned tõhusad konstruktsioonid, mis suudavad takistada zk-SNARK-i seadistusfaasi ründeid ja mis saavutavad senisest tugevama turvataseme. Näitame ka seda, et sarnased tehnikad võimaldavad leevendada usaldust tagauksega kinnitusskeemides, mis on krüptograafiliste primitiivide veel üks silmapaistev perekond ja mis samuti nõub usaldatud seadistusfaasi. Teises suunas esitame mõned tõhusad konstruktsioonid, mis tagavad parema turvalisuse minimaalsete lisakuludega. Mõned esitatud konstruktsioonidest võimaldavad lihtsustada praegusi TK-turvalisi protokolle, nimelt privaatsust säilitavate nutilepingusüsteemide Hawk ja Gyges konstruktsiooni, ja parandada nende tõhusust. Uusi konstruktsioone saab aga otse kasutada uutes protokollides, mis soovivad kasutada zk-SNARK-e. Osa väljapakutud zk-SNARK-e on implementeeritud teegis Libsnark ja empiirilised tulemused kinnitavad, et usalduse vähendamiseks või suurema turvalisuse saavutamiseks on arvutuslikud lisakulud väikesed.Zero-knowledge Succinct Non-interactive ARguments of Knowledge (zk-SNARKs) are an efficient family of NIZK proof systems that are constructed in the Common Reference String (CRS) model and due to their succinct proofs and very efficient verification, they are widely adopted in large-scale practical applications. In this thesis, we study zk-SNARKs from two perspectives, namely reducing trust and improving security in them. In the first direction, we investigate how much one can mitigate trust in pairing-based zk-SNARKs without sacrificing their efficiency. In such constructions, the parties of protocol will obtain a certain level of security even if the setup phase was done maliciously or the secret information of the setup phase was revealed. As a result of this direction, we present some efficient constructions that can resist against subverting of the setup phase of zk-SNARKs and achieve a certain level of security which is stronger than before. We also show that similar techniques will allow us to mitigate the trust in the trapdoor commitment schemes that are another prominent family of cryptographic primitives that require a trusted setup phase. In the second direction, we present some efficient constructions that achieve more security with minimal overhead. Some of the presented constructions allow to simplify the construction of current UC-secure protocols and improve their efficiency. New constructions can be directly deployed in any novel protocols that aim to use zk-SNARKs. Some of the proposed zk-SNARKs are implemented in Libsnark, the state-of-the-art library for zk-SNARKs, and empirical experiences confirm that the computational cost to mitigate the trust or to achieve more security is practical.https://www.ester.ee/record=b535927

On the security of the BCTV Pinocchio zk-SNARK variant

The main result of this note is a severe flaw in the description of the zk-SNARK in [BCTV14]. The flaw stems from including redundant elements in the CRS, as compared to that of the original Pinocchio protocol [PHGR16], which are vital not to expose. The flaw enables creating a proof of knowledge for *any* public input given a valid proof for *some* public input. We also provide a proof of security for the [BCTV14] zk-SNARK in the generic group model, when these elements are excluded from the CRS, provided a certain linear algebraic condition is satisfied by the QAP polynomials