Future of the First Amendment: What America's High School Students Think About Their Freedoms

Presents findings from a survey of students and teachers in 34 high schools, that examines attitudes toward First Amendment protections for national and local news media, and student newspapers, and evaluates current education on the rights it guarantees

Decision Making at College Student Newspapers

This study provides a literature review of presidential leadership styles, how college presidents communicate with constituencies, shared student governance and independence of student newspapers. The study involved two surveys: one to Pennsylvania college public relations directors and a second to Pennsylvania college student editors. The combined survey results examined whether presidential leadership style affected interactions with faculty, administration and student newspapers. The study concluded that the type of presidential leadership style did not correlate with interactions with student newspapers or the paper\u27s coverage of the president, that there was no correlation between the independence of newspapers and its treatment of the president and that an institution\u27s religious or secular structure had no influence on the president\u27s interactions with the student newspaper

Unsupervised Bias Detection in College Student Newspapers

This paper presents a pipeline with minimal human influence for scraping and detecting bias on college newspaper archives. This paper introduces a framework for scraping complex archive sites that automated tools fail to grab data from, and subsequently generates a dataset of 14 student papers with 23,154 entries. This data can also then be queried by keyword to calculate bias by comparing the sentiment of a large language model summary to the original article. The advantages of this approach are that it is less comparative than reconstruction bias and requires less labelled data than generating keyword sentiment. Results are calculated on politically charged words as well as control words to show how conclusions can be drawn. The complete method facilitates the extraction of nuanced insights with minimal assumptions and categorizations, paving the way for a more objective understanding of bias within student newspaper sources.Comment: 7 pages, 5 figures, 3 tables, submitted to AAAI202

Nautilus, Vol. 31 No. 3 (Mar 1978)

Salve Regina College student newspaper.https://digitalcommons.salve.edu/student-newspapers/1044/thumbnail.jp

Nautilus, Vol. 33 No. 1 (Oct 1979)

Salve Regina College student newspaper.https://digitalcommons.salve.edu/student-newspapers/1052/thumbnail.jp

Nautilus, Vol. 32 No. 6 (May 1979)

Salve Regina College student newspaper.https://digitalcommons.salve.edu/student-newspapers/1051/thumbnail.jp

Nautilus, Vol. 31 No.4 (May 1978)

Salve Regina College student newspaper.https://digitalcommons.salve.edu/student-newspapers/1045/thumbnail.jp

Nautilus, Vol. 35 No. 4 (Feb 1982)

Salve Regina College student newspaper.https://digitalcommons.salve.edu/student-newspapers/1064/thumbnail.jp

Ebb Tide, (Oct 1969)

Salve Regina College student newspaper.https://digitalcommons.salve.edu/student-newspapers/1073/thumbnail.jp

Ebb Tide, Vol. 9 No. 2 (Nov-Dec 1955)

Salve Regina College student newspaper.https://digitalcommons.salve.edu/student-newspapers/1005/thumbnail.jp