155,350 research outputs found

    Revision of reversed shoulder arthroplasty : is a reoperation possible?

    Get PDF
    Introduction. As the number of reversed shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) procedures increases, the revision rate will also increase. In case of severe bone insufficiency, instability or infection of the primary RSA, revision to another RSA is preferable but not always possible. Hemiarthroplasty (HA), spacers and resection arthroplasty (RA) have been described in this indication. Materials and methods. Between 2004 and 2016, 20 shoulders in 19 patientswere treated at Ghent University Hospital for failed revision of RSA. Nine received a megahead prosthesis, a spacerwas implanted in 6, and 5 underwent RA. Results. Indications for implantation of a megahead prosthesis were loosening RSA (n = 5), infection (n = 4), dislocation (n = 1) and nerve irritation (n = 1). Improvement of range ofmotionwas observed. Anterosuperior migration of the prosthesis was noted in 2 patients. Another 2 patients were ultimately revised to RSA. Seven permanent spacerswere implanted for infection, of which 2 remain in place till today. The other 5 were revised to RSA. Of the 5 patients treated with RA, 3 were revised further on to RSA, resulting in pain relief and regain of function. Discussion. Our study shows that amegahead prosthesis has better functional results than RA, but is inferior to RSA. Due to increasing surgical experience and improving technique, 9 patients could ultimately be reconverted to another RSA. A review of current literature is presented. In HA and RA, the functional results are poor, and pain relief is uncertain. Results of spacers are variable and can be satisfactory. Arthrodesis is a last resort. Conclusion. In our case series study, a hemiarthroplasty can be performed in case of failure of RSA. However, the results are inferior to another RSA

    An efficient and secure RSA--like cryptosystem exploiting R\'edei rational functions over conics

    Full text link
    We define an isomorphism between the group of points of a conic and the set of integers modulo a prime equipped with a non-standard product. This product can be efficiently evaluated through the use of R\'edei rational functions. We then exploit the isomorphism to construct a novel RSA-like scheme. We compare our scheme with classic RSA and with RSA-like schemes based on the cubic or conic equation. The decryption operation of the proposed scheme turns to be two times faster than RSA, and involves the lowest number of modular inversions with respect to other RSA-like schemes based on curves. Our solution offers the same security as RSA in a one-to-one communication and more security in broadcast applications.Comment: 18 pages, 1 figur

    Optimal competitiveness for the Rectilinear Steiner Arborescence problem

    Full text link
    We present optimal online algorithms for two related known problems involving Steiner Arborescence, improving both the lower and the upper bounds. One of them is the well studied continuous problem of the {\em Rectilinear Steiner Arborescence} (RSARSA). We improve the lower bound and the upper bound on the competitive ratio for RSARSA from O(logN)O(\log N) and Ω(logN)\Omega(\sqrt{\log N}) to Θ(logNloglogN)\Theta(\frac{\log N}{\log \log N}), where NN is the number of Steiner points. This separates the competitive ratios of RSARSA and the Symetric-RSARSA, two problems for which the bounds of Berman and Coulston is STOC 1997 were identical. The second problem is one of the Multimedia Content Distribution problems presented by Papadimitriou et al. in several papers and Charikar et al. SODA 1998. It can be viewed as the discrete counterparts (or a network counterpart) of RSARSA. For this second problem we present tight bounds also in terms of the network size, in addition to presenting tight bounds in terms of the number of Steiner points (the latter are similar to those we derived for RSARSA)

    Food for thought: how nutrients regulate root system architecture

    Get PDF
    The spatial arrangement of the plant root system (root system architecture, RSA) is very sensitive to edaphic and endogenous signals that report on the nutrient status of soil and plant. Signalling pathways underpinning RSA responses to individual nutrients, particularly nitrate and phosphate, have been unravelled. Researchers have now started to investigate interactive effects between two or more nutrients on RSA. Several proteins enabling crosstalk between signalling pathways have recently been identified. RSA is potentially an important trait for sustainable and/or marginal agriculture. It is generally assumed that RSA responses are adaptive and optimise nutrient uptake in a given environment, but hard evidence for this paradigm is still sparse. Here we summarize recent advances made in these areas of research
    corecore