Endoscopy : an evolving speciality

The practice of endoscopy has been rapidly changing due to new emerging technologies and novel techniques. There has been more focus on colonoscopy training with the development of structured programmes including simulators. Chromoendoscopy and magnification endoscopy have enabled improved diagnosis of small neoplastic lesions and will be important for the success of colorectal cancer screening programmes. The small bowel is now accessible to diagnostic modalities like capsule endoscopy and to therapeutic tools through the double balloon enteroscope. Endoscopic therapy has also become more sophisticated with endoscopic therapy of reflux disease now possible. Excision of large colorectal adenomatous polyps by endoscopic mucosal resection and dissection of submucosal tumours may reduce the need for surgical intervention. The practice of endoscopy has rapidly changed over the past few years. What was once a simple diagnostic procedure made possible by the development of fibre optics has become a speciality in its own right. This article will highlight some aspects of endoscopic practice that have undergone major changes over the past few years and that will shape endoscopy practice in the future.peer-reviewe

Methods and Procedures

published or submitted for publicatio

Shrinkage Confidence Procedures

The possibility of improving on the usual multivariate normal confidence was first discussed in Stein (1962). Using the ideas of shrinkage, through Bayesian and empirical Bayesian arguments, domination results, both analytic and numerical, have been obtained. Here we trace some of the developments in confidence set estimation.Comment: Published in at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/10-STS319 the Statistical Science (http://www.imstat.org/sts/) by the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org

Optimality in multiple comparison procedures

When many (m) null hypotheses are tested with a single dataset, the control of the number of false rejections is often the principal consideration. Two popular controlling rates are the probability of making at least one false discovery (FWER) and the expected fraction of false discoveries among all rejections (FDR). Scaled multiple comparison error rates form a new family that bridges the gap between these two extremes. For example, the Scaled Expected Value (SEV) limits the number of false positives relative to an arbitrary increasing function of the number of rejections, that is, E(FP/s(R)). We discuss the problem of how to choose in practice which procedure to use, with elements of an optimality theory, by considering the number of false rejections FP separately from the number of correct rejections TP. Using this framework we will show how to choose an element in the new family mentioned above.Comment: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1112.451

Collections Theft Response Procedures

Offers guidance for theft response and suggest actions to take before and after an incident

Behavioral implications of shortlisting procedures

We consider two-stage “shortlisting procedures” in which the menu of alternatives is first pruned by some process or criterion and then a binary relation is maximized. Given a particular first-stage process, our main result supplies a necessary and sufficient condition for choice data to be consistent with a procedure in the designated class. This result applies to any class of procedures with a certain lattice structure, including the cases of “consideration filters,” “satisficing with salience effects,” and “rational shortlist methods.” The theory avoids background assumptions made for mathematical convenience; in this and other respects following Richter’s classical analysis of preference-maximizing choice in the absence of shortlisting