Does bilingual input hurt? A simulation of language discrimination and clustering using i-vectors

International audienceThe language discrimination process in infants has been successfully modeled using i-vector based systems, with results replicating several experimental findings. Still, recent work found intriguing results regarding the difference between monolingual and mixed-language exposure on language discrimination tasks. We use two carefully designed datasets, with an additional "bilingual" condition on the i-vector model of language discrimination. Our results do not show any difference in the ability of discriminating languages between the three backgrounds, although we do replicate past observations that distant languages (English-Finnish) are easier to discriminate than close languages (English-German). We do, however, find a strong effect of background when testing for the ability of the learner to automatically sort sentences in language clusters: bilingual background being generally harder than mixed background (one speaker one language). Other analyses reveal that clustering is dominated by speakers information rather than by languages

Subspace Gaussian Mixture Models for Language Identification and Dysarthric Speech Intelligibility Assessment

En esta Tesis se ha investigado la aplicación de técnicas de modelado de subespacios de mezclas de Gaussianas en dos problemas relacionados con las tecnologías del habla, como son la identificación automática de idioma (LID, por sus siglas en inglés) y la evaluación automática de inteligibilidad en el habla de personas con disartria. Una de las técnicas más importantes estudiadas es el análisis factorial conjunto (JFA, por sus siglas en inglés). JFA es, en esencia, un modelo de mezclas de Gaussianas en el que la media de cada componente se expresa como una suma de factores de dimensión reducida, y donde cada factor representa una contribución diferente a la señal de audio. Esta factorización nos permite compensar nuestros modelos frente a contribuciones indeseadas presentes en la señal, como la información de canal. JFA se ha investigado como clasficador y como extractor de parámetros. En esta última aproximación se modela un solo factor que representa todas las contribuciones presentes en la señal. Los puntos en este subespacio se denominan i-Vectors. Así, un i-Vector es un vector de baja dimensión que representa una grabación de audio. Los i-Vectors han resultado ser muy útiles como vector de características para representar señales en diferentes problemas relacionados con el aprendizaje de máquinas. En relación al problema de LID, se han investigado dos sistemas diferentes de acuerdo al tipo de información extraída de la señal. En el primero, la señal se parametriza en vectores acústicos con información espectral a corto plazo. En este caso, observamos mejoras de hasta un 50% con el sistema basado en i-Vectors respecto al sistema que utilizaba JFA como clasificador. Se comprobó que el subespacio de canal del modelo JFA también contenía información del idioma, mientras que con los i-Vectors no se descarta ningún tipo de información, y además, son útiles para mitigar diferencias entre los datos de entrenamiento y de evaluación. En la fase de clasificación, los i-Vectors de cada idioma se modelaron con una distribución Gaussiana en la que la matriz de covarianza era común para todos. Este método es simple y rápido, y no requiere de ningún post-procesado de los i-Vectors. En el segundo sistema, se introdujo el uso de información prosódica y formántica en un sistema de LID basado en i-Vectors. La precisión de éste estaba por debajo de la del sistema acústico. Sin embargo, los dos sistemas son complementarios, y se obtuvo hasta un 20% de mejora con la fusión de los dos respecto al sistema acústico solo. Tras los buenos resultados obtenidos para LID, y dado que, teóricamente, los i-Vectors capturan toda la información presente en la señal, decidimos usarlos para la evaluar de manera automática la inteligibilidad en el habla de personas con disartria. Los logopedas están muy interesados en esta tecnología porque permitiría evaluar a sus pacientes de una manera objetiva y consistente. En este caso, los i-Vectors se obtuvieron a partir de información espectral a corto plazo de la señal, y la inteligibilidad se calculó a partir de los i-Vectors obtenidos para un conjunto de palabras dichas por el locutor evaluado. Comprobamos que los resultados eran mucho mejores si en el entrenamiento del sistema se incorporaban datos de la persona que iba a ser evaluada. No obstante, esta limitación podría aliviarse utilizando una mayor cantidad de datos para entrenar el sistema.In this Thesis, we investigated how to effciently apply subspace Gaussian mixture modeling techniques onto two speech technology problems, namely automatic spoken language identification (LID) and automatic intelligibility assessment of dysarthric speech. One of the most important of such techniques in this Thesis was joint factor analysis (JFA). JFA is essentially a Gaussian mixture model where the mean of the components is expressed as a sum of low-dimension factors that represent different contributions to the speech signal. This factorization makes it possible to compensate for undesired sources of variability, like the channel. JFA was investigated as final classiffer and as feature extractor. In the latter approach, a single subspace including all sources of variability is trained, and points in this subspace are known as i-Vectors. Thus, one i-Vector is defined as a low-dimension representation of a single utterance, and they are a very powerful feature for different machine learning problems. We have investigated two different LID systems according to the type of features extracted from speech. First, we extracted acoustic features representing short-time spectral information. In this case, we observed relative improvements with i-Vectors with respect to JFA of up to 50%. We realized that the channel subspace in a JFA model also contains language information whereas i-Vectors do not discard any language information, and moreover, they help to reduce mismatches between training and testing data. For classification, we modeled the i-Vectors of each language with a Gaussian distribution with covariance matrix shared among languages. This method is simple and fast, and it worked well without any post-processing. Second, we introduced the use of prosodic and formant information with the i-Vectors system. The performance was below the acoustic system but both were found to be complementary and we obtained up to a 20% relative improvement with the fusion with respect to the acoustic system alone. Given the success in LID and the fact that i-Vectors capture all the information that is present in the data, we decided to use i-Vectors for other tasks, specifically, the assessment of speech intelligibility in speakers with different types of dysarthria. Speech therapists are very interested in this technology because it would allow them to objectively and consistently rate the intelligibility of their patients. In this case, the input features were extracted from short-term spectral information, and the intelligibility was assessed from the i-Vectors calculated from a set of words uttered by the tested speaker. We found that the performance was clearly much better if we had available data for training of the person that would use the application. We think that this limitation could be relaxed if we had larger databases for training. However, the recording process is not easy for people with disabilities, and it is difficult to obtain large datasets of dysarthric speakers open to the research community. Finally, the same system architecture for intelligibility assessment based on i-Vectors was used for predicting the accuracy that an automatic speech recognizer (ASR) system would obtain with dysarthric speakers. The only difference between both was the ground truth label set used for training. Predicting the performance response of an ASR system would increase the confidence of speech therapists in these systems and would diminish health related costs. The results were not as satisfactory as in the previous case, probably because an ASR is a complex system whose accuracy can be very difficult to be predicted only with acoustic information. Nonetheless, we think that we opened a door to an interesting research direction for the two problems

Multi-dialect Arabic broadcast speech recognition

Dialectal Arabic speech research suffers from the lack of labelled resources and standardised orthography. There are three main challenges in dialectal Arabic speech recognition: (i) finding labelled dialectal Arabic speech data, (ii) training robust dialectal speech recognition models from limited labelled data and (iii) evaluating speech recognition for dialects with no orthographic rules. This thesis is concerned with the following three contributions: Arabic Dialect Identification: We are mainly dealing with Arabic speech without prior knowledge of the spoken dialect. Arabic dialects could be sufficiently diverse to the extent that one can argue that they are different languages rather than dialects of the same language. We have two contributions: First, we use crowdsourcing to annotate a multi-dialectal speech corpus collected from Al Jazeera TV channel. We obtained utterance level dialect labels for 57 hours of high-quality consisting of four major varieties of dialectal Arabic (DA), comprised of Egyptian, Levantine, Gulf or Arabic peninsula, North African or Moroccan from almost 1,000 hours. Second, we build an Arabic dialect identification (ADI) system. We explored two main groups of features, namely acoustic features and linguistic features. For the linguistic features, we look at a wide range of features, addressing words, characters and phonemes. With respect to acoustic features, we look at raw features such as mel-frequency cepstral coefficients combined with shifted delta cepstra (MFCC-SDC), bottleneck features and the i-vector as a latent variable. We studied both generative and discriminative classifiers, in addition to deep learning approaches, namely deep neural network (DNN) and convolutional neural network (CNN). In our work, we propose Arabic as a five class dialect challenge comprising of the previously mentioned four dialects as well as modern standard Arabic. Arabic Speech Recognition: We introduce our effort in building Arabic automatic speech recognition (ASR) and we create an open research community to advance it. This section has two main goals: First, creating a framework for Arabic ASR that is publicly available for research. We address our effort in building two multi-genre broadcast (MGB) challenges. MGB-2 focuses on broadcast news using more than 1,200 hours of speech and 130M words of text collected from the broadcast domain. MGB-3, however, focuses on dialectal multi-genre data with limited non-orthographic speech collected from YouTube, with special attention paid to transfer learning. Second, building a robust Arabic ASR system and reporting a competitive word error rate (WER) to use it as a potential benchmark to advance the state of the art in Arabic ASR. Our overall system is a combination of five acoustic models (AM): unidirectional long short term memory (LSTM), bidirectional LSTM (BLSTM), time delay neural network (TDNN), TDNN layers along with LSTM layers (TDNN-LSTM) and finally TDNN layers followed by BLSTM layers (TDNN-BLSTM). The AM is trained using purely sequence trained neural networks lattice-free maximum mutual information (LFMMI). The generated lattices are rescored using a four-gram language model (LM) and a recurrent neural network with maximum entropy (RNNME) LM. Our official WER is 13%, which has the lowest WER reported on this task. Evaluation: The third part of the thesis addresses our effort in evaluating dialectal speech with no orthographic rules. Our methods learn from multiple transcribers and align the speech hypothesis to overcome the non-orthographic aspects. Our multi-reference WER (MR-WER) approach is similar to the BLEU score used in machine translation (MT). We have also automated this process by learning different spelling variants from Twitter data. We mine automatically from a huge collection of tweets in an unsupervised fashion to build more than 11M n-to-m lexical pairs, and we propose a new evaluation metric: dialectal WER (WERd). Finally, we tried to estimate the word error rate (e-WER) with no reference transcription using decoding and language features. We show that our word error rate estimation is robust for many scenarios with and without the decoding features