17,303 research outputs found
Improved Distributed Algorithms for Exact Shortest Paths
Computing shortest paths is one of the central problems in the theory of
distributed computing. For the last few years, substantial progress has been
made on the approximate single source shortest paths problem, culminating in an
algorithm of Becker et al. [DISC'17] which deterministically computes
-approximate shortest paths in time, where
is the hop-diameter of the graph. Up to logarithmic factors, this time
complexity is optimal, matching the lower bound of Elkin [STOC'04].
The question of exact shortest paths however saw no algorithmic progress for
decades, until the recent breakthrough of Elkin [STOC'17], which established a
sublinear-time algorithm for exact single source shortest paths on undirected
graphs. Shortly after, Huang et al. [FOCS'17] provided improved algorithms for
exact all pairs shortest paths problem on directed graphs.
In this paper, we present a new single-source shortest path algorithm with
complexity . For polylogarithmic , this improves
on Elkin's bound and gets closer to the
lower bound of Elkin [STOC'04]. For larger values of
, we present an improved variant of our algorithm which achieves complexity
, and
thus compares favorably with Elkin's bound of in essentially the entire range of parameters. This
algorithm provides also a qualitative improvement, because it works for the
more challenging case of directed graphs (i.e., graphs where the two directions
of an edge can have different weights), constituting the first sublinear-time
algorithm for directed graphs. Our algorithm also extends to the case of exact
-source shortest paths...Comment: 26 page
Parameterized Distributed Algorithms
In this work, we initiate a thorough study of graph optimization problems parameterized by the output size in the distributed setting. In such a problem, an algorithm decides whether a solution of size bounded by k exists and if so, it finds one. We study fundamental problems, including Minimum Vertex Cover (MVC), Maximum Independent Set (MaxIS), Maximum Matching (MaxM), and many others, in both the LOCAL and CONGEST distributed computation models. We present lower bounds for the round complexity of solving parameterized problems in both models, together with optimal and near-optimal upper bounds.
Our results extend beyond the scope of parameterized problems. We show that any LOCAL (1+epsilon)-approximation algorithm for the above problems must take Omega(epsilon^{-1}) rounds. Joined with the (epsilon^{-1}log n)^{O(1)} rounds algorithm of [Ghaffari et al., 2017] and the Omega (sqrt{(log n)/(log log n)}) lower bound of [Fabian Kuhn et al., 2016], the lower bounds match the upper bound up to polynomial factors in both parameters. We also show that our parameterized approach reduces the runtime of exact and approximate CONGEST algorithms for MVC and MaxM if the optimal solution is small, without knowing its size beforehand. Finally, we propose the first o(n^2) rounds CONGEST algorithms that approximate MVC within a factor strictly smaller than 2
On Derandomizing Local Distributed Algorithms
The gap between the known randomized and deterministic local distributed
algorithms underlies arguably the most fundamental and central open question in
distributed graph algorithms. In this paper, we develop a generic and clean
recipe for derandomizing LOCAL algorithms. We also exhibit how this simple
recipe leads to significant improvements on a number of problem. Two main
results are:
- An improved distributed hypergraph maximal matching algorithm, improving on
Fischer, Ghaffari, and Kuhn [FOCS'17], and giving improved algorithms for
edge-coloring, maximum matching approximation, and low out-degree edge
orientation. The first gives an improved algorithm for Open Problem 11.4 of the
book of Barenboim and Elkin, and the last gives the first positive resolution
of their Open Problem 11.10.
- An improved distributed algorithm for the Lov\'{a}sz Local Lemma, which
gets closer to a conjecture of Chang and Pettie [FOCS'17], and moreover leads
to improved distributed algorithms for problems such as defective coloring and
-SAT.Comment: 37 page
Compositional competitiveness for distributed algorithms
We define a measure of competitive performance for distributed algorithms
based on throughput, the number of tasks that an algorithm can carry out in a
fixed amount of work. This new measure complements the latency measure of Ajtai
et al., which measures how quickly an algorithm can finish tasks that start at
specified times. The novel feature of the throughput measure, which
distinguishes it from the latency measure, is that it is compositional: it
supports a notion of algorithms that are competitive relative to a class of
subroutines, with the property that an algorithm that is k-competitive relative
to a class of subroutines, combined with an l-competitive member of that class,
gives a combined algorithm that is kl-competitive.
In particular, we prove the throughput-competitiveness of a class of
algorithms for collect operations, in which each of a group of n processes
obtains all values stored in an array of n registers. Collects are a
fundamental building block of a wide variety of shared-memory distributed
algorithms, and we show that several such algorithms are competitive relative
to collects. Inserting a competitive collect in these algorithms gives the
first examples of competitive distributed algorithms obtained by composition
using a general construction.Comment: 33 pages, 2 figures; full version of STOC 96 paper titled "Modular
competitiveness for distributed algorithms.
- …