Developing research capacity in the social sciences: a professionality-based model

It is argued in this article that the shortcomings of social science research stem fundamentally from the lack of a developmentalist culture, which manifests itself by researchers’ inadequate interest and participation in continuing professional development. Yet institutional research leaders also have a key role in increasing research capacity. They need to be specific about precisely what sort of development they want to occur: what specific skills need to be developed, and what kinds of output they are encouraging. These will be incorporated into their visions of institutional research activity and achievement, which must be communicated clearly to those for whose development they are responsible. What is proposed is a model of institutionally-based professional development centred around the notion of ‘extended’ professionality, and from which developmentalist research cultures are likely to emerge

The New Developmentalism and Conventional Orthodoxy

O Fracasso das Políticas e Reformas Propostas por Washington e Nova York, Aqui Denominadas Ortodoxia Convencional , em Promover a Estabilização e o Crescimento Econômico na América Latina Abriu Espaço para o Surgimento de uma Estratégia Nacional de Crescimento, a Qual Chamamos Novo-Desenvolvimentismo . Capitalismo, Desenvolvimento Econômico, Nação e Estado-Nação são Conceitos Históricos Interdependentes. o Desenvolvimento do Capitalismo Depende de uma Estratégia Nacional que Precisa de uma Nação Capaz de Formulá-La. o Antigo Desenvolvimentismo Promoveu o Crescimento na América Latina Desde os Anos 1930, Mas nos Anos 1980 Ficou Ultrapassado. Diferentemente, o Novo Desenvolvimentismo é Orientado para as Exportações e Rejeita o Protecionismo. Ambicionando um Mercado e um Estado Fortes, Apóia uma Disciplina Fiscal que Vise uma Poupança Pública Positiva. é Nacionalista, Porque Visa o Interesse Nacional e Rejeita as Pressões Vindas do Norte, Mas é um Nacionalismo Liberal, Social e Republicano. Diverge Fortemente da Ortodoxia Convencional, Porque Rejeita a Estratégia de Crescimento com Poupança Externa e a Abertura da Conta Capital, Afirma que a Taxa de Cambio Pode e Deve ser Administrada, e que é Necessária uma Estratégia Especial para Combater Taxa de Juro Alta e a Moeda Apreciada que Mantêm a Economia Brasileira Instável e Semi-Estagnada.

From old to new developmentalism in latin America

The failure of the Washington Consensus and of macroeconomic policies based onhigh interest rates and non-competitive exchange rates to generate economic growthprompted Latin America to formulate national development strategies. Newdevelopmentalism is an alternative strategy not only to conventional orthodoxy but also toold-style Latin American national developmentalism. While old national developmentalismwas based on the tendency of the terms of trade to deteriorate and, adopting a microeconomicapproach, proposed economic planning and industrialization, the new nationaldevelopmentalismassumes that industrialization has been achieved, although in differentdegrees by each country, and argues that, in order to assure fast growth rates and catching up,the tendency that must be neutralized is that of the exchange rate to overvaluation. Contraryto the claims of conventional economics, a capable state remains the key instrument to ensureeconomic development, and industrial policy continues to be necessary; but whatdistinguishes the new approach is principally growth with domestic savings instead of withforeign savings, a macroeconomic policy based on moderate interest rates and a competitiveexchange rate instead of the high interest rates and the overvalued currencies prescribed byconventional orthodoxy.

Developmentalism: Learning as the Basis for Evaluating Information

The developmentalist conception of information’s value makes learning the central consideration for evaluating information. Following philosopher Richard Kraut, this article argues that developmentalism provides an important complement to prevalent methods of teaching the evaluation of information. These methods emphasize (a) trustworthiness—for example, CRAAP (currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, and purpose) and CARS (credibility, accuracy, reasonableness, and support) and (b) the use of information in an argument—for example, Joseph Bizup’s BEAM (background, exhibit, argument, method). The neglected link between evaluation and learning is crucial for early college researchers; otherwise, students can easily just find sources to “back up” their existing opinions. Learning-centered evaluation also challenges students to question how selective exposure influences their media habits. The article includes suggested applications for information literacy instruction in first-year composition

Structuralist macroeconomics and new developmentalism

This paper, first, presents some basic ideas and models of a structuralist development macroeconomics that complements and actualizes the thought of structuralist development economics that was dominant between the 1940s and the 1960s including in the World Bank. The new approach focus on the relation between the exchange rate and economic growth, and develops three interrelated models: the tendency to the overvaluation of the exchange, the critique of growth with foreign savings, and a model of the Dutch disease based on the existence of two exchange rate equilibriums: the “current” and the “industrial” equilibrium. Second, it summarizes “new developmentalism” – a sum of growth policies based on these models and on the experience of fast growing Asian countries

Can Productive Change and Income Redistribution be Compatible with Global Financial Asymmetries?

The 2000s have brought a renewed debate on strategies of ‘developmentalism’ in emerging market economies, especially in Latin America. We consider new concepts of developmentalism to be strategies in which the state deliberately pushes the process of development, in terms of structural change, and aims at income redistribution. In our paper, we seek to systematize this debate, comparing the concepts of new developmentalism and social developmentalism. We argue that of particular relevance for this discussion are the policy space constraints for emerging market economies imposed by international monetary and financial asymmetries. We conclude that the latter of the two approaches does not consider appropriately the policy constraints related to these asymmetries, which reduce the space for the implementation of developmentalist policies, while the former sees redistribution as a mere result of export-led industrialization

Session 1 : Common as alternative for the future (I) : The uncommon commons

On Day 4 (16 June 2018), in the session of “Common as Alternative for the Future (I)”, Lisa ROFEL (University of California, Santa Cruz, USA) delivered a lecture on The Uncommon Commons. The video is produced by Global University for Sustainability, 2018

Howard Gardner: the myth of multiple intelligences

This evening I want to examine Howard Gardner’s idea that there are multiple intelligences (MI theory). MI theory identifies some eight or nine types of intelligence: not only the logico-mathematical and linguistic kinds measured by IQ

Japan and the East Asian financial crisis: patterns, motivations and instrumentalisation of Japanese regional economic diplomacy

At first sight, the East Asian financial crisis represents an instance of Japan failing the test of regional leadership - as evidenced by its abandonment of initial proposals for an Asian Monetary Fund (AMF) in the face of US and Chinese opposition in 1997. However, if a second look is taken, and one which is sensitised to the fundamental characteristics of its diplomacy, then Japan can be seen as far more effective in augmenting its regional leadership role than previously imagined. Indeed, this article demonstrates that Japanese policy-makers have resurrected, over the longer term and in different guises, AMF-like frameworks which provide a potential springboard for further regional cooperation. Hence, the aims of this article are twofold. The first is to demonstrate the overall efficacy of Japanese regional economic diplomacy, and its ability to control outcomes through steering East Asia towards enhanced monetary cooperation. The second is to explain the reasons behind Japan's distinctive policy approach towards the financial crisis and general lessons for understanding its foreign policy. The article seeks to do so by asking three fundamental questions about the 'what', 'why' and 'how' of Japan's regional role: 'what' in terms of the dominant behavioural patterns of Japan's economic diplomacy; 'why' in terms of the motivations for this behaviour; and 'how' in terms of Japan's instrumentalisation of its regional policy