Matched-pair analysis of patients with female and male breast cancer: a comparative analysis

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Male breast cancer (MBC) is a rare disease accounting for approximately 1% of all breast carcinomas. Presently treatment recommendations are derived from the standards for female breast cancer. However, those approaches might be inadequate because of distinct gender specific differences in tumor biology of breast cancer. This study was planned in order to contrast potential differences between female and male breast cancer in both tumor biological behavior and clinical management.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>MBC diagnosed between 1995-2007 (region Chemnitz/Zwickau, Saxony, Germany) was retrospectively analyzed. Tumor characteristics, treatment and follow-up of the patients were documented. In order to highlight potential differences each MBC was matched with a female counterpart (FBC) that showed accordance in at least eight tumor characteristics (year of diagnosis, age, tumor stage, nodal status, grade, estrogen- and progesterone receptors, HER2 status).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>108 male/female matched-pairs were available for survival analyses. In our study men and women with breast cancer had similar disease-free (DFS) and overall (OS) survival. The 5-years DFS was 53.4% (95% CI, range 54.1-66.3) in men respectively 62.6% (95% CI, 63.5-75.3) in women (p > 0.05). The 5-years OS was 71.4% (95% CI, 62.1-72.7%) and 70.3% (95% CI, 32.6-49.6) in women (p > 0.05). In males DFS analyses revealed progesterone receptor expression as the only prognostic relevant factor (p = 0.006). In multivariate analyses for OS both advanced tumor size (p = 0.01) and a lack of progesterone receptor expression were correlated (p = 0.01) with poor patients outcome in MBC.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Our comparative study revealed no survival differences between male and female breast cancer patients and gives evidence that gender is no predictor for survival in breast cancer. This was shown despite of significant gender specific differences in terms of frequency and intensity of systemic therapy in favor to female breast cancer.</p

Increased detection of lymphatic vessel invasion by D2-40 (podoplanin) in early breast cancer: possible influence on patient selection for accelerated partial breast irradiation.

Item does not contain fulltextPURPOSE: Several international trials are currently investigating accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) for patients with early-stage breast cancer. According to existing guidelines, patients with lymphatic vessel invasion (LVI) do not qualify for APBI. D2-40 (podoplanin) significantly increases the frequency of LVI detection compared with conventional hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining in early-stage breast cancer. Our purpose was to retrospectively assess the hypothetical change in management from APBI to whole breast radiotherapy with the application of D2-40. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Immunostaining with D2-40 was performed on 254 invasive breast tumors of 247 patients. The following criteria were used to determine the eligibility for APBI: invasive ductal adenocarcinoma of < or =3 cm, negative axillary node status (N0), and unifocal disease. Of the 247 patients, 74 with available information concerning LVI, as detected by D2-40 immunostaining and routine HE staining, formed our study population. RESULTS: Using D2-40, our results demonstrated a significantly greater detection rate (p = .031) of LVI compared with routine HE staining. LVI was correctly identified by D2-40 (D2-40-positive LVI) in 10 (13.5%) of 74 tumors. On routine HE staining, 4 tumors (5.4%) were classified as HE-positive LVI. Doublestaining of these specimens with D2-40 unmasked false-positive LVI status in 2 (50%) of the 4 tumors. According to the current recommendations for APBI, immunostaining with D2-40 would have changed the clinical management from APBI to whole breast radiotherapy in 8 (10.8%) of 74 patients and from whole breast radiotherapy to APBI in 2 patients (2.7%). CONCLUSION: These data support the implementation of D2-40 immunostaining in the routine workup to determine a patient's eligibility for APBI

Detection of lymphovascular invasion in early breast cancer by D2-40 (podoplanin): a clinically useful predictor for axillary lymph node metastases.

Item does not contain fulltextPURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the use of D2-40 for the detection of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in node positive and negative early breast cancer. LVI is associated with axillary lymph node metastases (ALNM) and a long-term prognostic factor. A precise identification of LVI would have a strong clinical impact for breast cancer patients. METHODS: Immunohistochemical staining with D2-40 and CD34 was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections of 254 invasive breast tumors of 247 patients with node negative and node positive early breast cancer. All slides were screened for the presence of LVI. Correlation with clinico-pathological factors including LVI as retrieved by routine haematoxylin and eosin (H.E.) stained sections and the eligibility for the prediction of ALNM was assessed. RESULTS: Using the D2-40 antibody for immunostaining, our results demonstrate a significant higher detection (P < 0.001) of LVI as compared with routine H.E.-staining in early breast cancer. LVI was correctly identified by D2-40 (D2-40+) in 70 out of 254 tumors (28%) as compared to 40 tumors (16%) by routine HE staining (HE+). There was a significant correlation between D2-40 + LVI and age, t-stage, nodal status, grading and hormonreceptor-status. Correlation between D2-40 + LVI and menopausal-status, HER2-status and histological type was not significant, while there was a significant correlation of D2-40 and so called "triple negative" tumors (ER/PR and HER2neu-negative). In a multivariate analysis D2-40+ was the strongest predictor for ALNM with an odds ratio of 3.489 and a P-value of P = 0.0003, followed only by T-stage and grading with odds ratios of 3.167 and 1.953 and P-values P = 0.0003 and P = 0.0352. CONCLUSION: Immunostaining with D2-40 significantly increased the frequency of detection of lymphatic invasion compared to conventional H.E.-staining in early breast cancer. As LVI is a strong predictive and prognostic marker, the monoclonal antibody D2-40 has the potential to play a significant role in pathological routine workup of breast tumors. Further prospective studies are needed to prove the clinical impact of D2-40

Supplementary Material for: Staging of Primary Breast Cancer Is not Indicated in Asymptomatic Patients with Early Tumor Stages

<b><i>Background: </i></b>The routinely practiced staging for distant metastasis in patients with primary breast cancer has been increasingly questioned. <b><i>Patients and Methods: </i></b>Data from 742 patients with breast cancer who had completed staging (chest x-ray, liver ultrasound, and bone scan) were retrospectively analyzed. Present findings were transferred to a dataset of a voluntarily monitored benchmarking project by the West German Breast Center that included patient data of 179 breast cancer centers. <b><i>Results: </i></b>Routine staging examinations revealed in 1.2% (n = 9) distant metastasis and in 38.8% (n = 288) suspicious results. In total, 15 patients (2%) had distant metastases confirmed by additional diagnostics. The existence of distant metastases correlated with tumor size, nodal state, and lymphatic vessel spread. Tumor size and nodal state were independent predictors for disseminated disease. The risk of exhibiting distant metastases was 0.77% for patients with tumor stage pT1 pN1. Based on these findings, in 159,310 patients 41,728 chest x-rays, 43,950 liver ultrasounds, and 39,037 bone scans could have been avoided. <b><i>Conclusion: </i></b>Asymptomatic patients with tumor stages ≤ pT1 pN1 do not benefit from staging of primary breast cancer. Suspending staging examinations for these patients could reduce cost without restricting oncologic safety