Undiagnosed OSA May Significantly Affect Outcomes in Adults Admitted for COPD in an Inner-City Hospital

Of 380 patients admitted for COPD exacerbation, 256 were screened for OSA with a sleep questionnaire (snoring, tiredness during daytime, observed apnea, high BP). Of these, 238 underwent an overnight high-resolution pulse oximetry/portable sleep monitoring. Of the 238 total patients, 111 (46.6%) were found to have OSA; 28.6% had mild, 9.7% moderate, and 8.4% severe OSA. Baseline characteristics and demographics were compared between the cohorts of participants with OSA and without OSA and were similar except that patients with OSA had a higher mean BMI (33.9 vs 30.3 kg/m2) and an increased prevalence of heart failure (19.8% vs 7.1%). For patients with COPD and mild OSA, odds of 30-day readmission were 2.05 times higher than for patients without OSA (32.4% vs 18.9%). Additionally, odds of 30-day readmission were 6.68 times higher for patients with moderate OSA vs patients without OSA (60.9% vs 18.9%) and 10.01 times high for patients with severe OSA vs patients without OSA (70% vs 18.9%). Readmission rates were also greater at 90 and 180 days. All-cause mortality was lower for patients without OSA than for patients with OSA (P < .01). The time to hospital readmission or death was shorter with greater OSA severity (P < .01).12 month embargo; available online 2 April 2020This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at [email protected]

Positive Airway Pressure Therapy Adherence with Mask Resupply: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.

There are currently few data on the impact of mask resupply on longer-term adherence to positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy. This retrospective analysis investigated the effects of mask/mask cushion resupply on the adherence to PAP versus no resupply. Deidentified patient billing data for PAP supply items were merged with telemonitoring data from Cloud-connected AirSense 10/AirCurve 10 devices via AirViewTM (ResMed). Eligible patients started PAP between 1 July 2014 and 17 June 2016, had ≥360 days of PAP device data, and achieved initial U.S. Medicare adherence criteria. Patients who received a resupply of mask systems/cushions (resupply group) were propensity-score-matched with those not receiving any mask/cushion resupply (control group). A total of 100,370 patients were included. From days 91 to 360, the mean device usage was 5.6 and 4.5 h/night in the resupply and control groups, respectively (p &lt; 0.0001). The proportion of patients with a mean device usage ≥4 h/night was significantly higher in the resupply group versus the control group (77% vs. 59%; p &lt; 0.0001). The therapy termination rate was significantly lower in the resupply group versus the control group (14.7% vs. 31.9%; p &lt; 0.0001); there was a trend toward lower therapy termination rates as the number of resupplies increased. The replacement of mask interface components was associated with better longer-term adherence to PAP therapy versus no resupply

Positive Airway Pressure Therapy Adherence with Mask Resupply: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.

There are currently few data on the impact of mask resupply on longer-term adherence to positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy. This retrospective analysis investigated the effects of mask/mask cushion resupply on the adherence to PAP versus no resupply. Deidentified patient billing data for PAP supply items were merged with telemonitoring data from Cloud-connected AirSense 10/AirCurve 10 devices via AirViewTM (ResMed). Eligible patients started PAP between 1 July 2014 and 17 June 2016, had ≥360 days of PAP device data, and achieved initial U.S. Medicare adherence criteria. Patients who received a resupply of mask systems/cushions (resupply group) were propensity-score-matched with those not receiving any mask/cushion resupply (control group). A total of 100,370 patients were included. From days 91 to 360, the mean device usage was 5.6 and 4.5 h/night in the resupply and control groups, respectively (p &lt; 0.0001). The proportion of patients with a mean device usage ≥4 h/night was significantly higher in the resupply group versus the control group (77% vs. 59%; p &lt; 0.0001). The therapy termination rate was significantly lower in the resupply group versus the control group (14.7% vs. 31.9%; p &lt; 0.0001); there was a trend toward lower therapy termination rates as the number of resupplies increased. The replacement of mask interface components was associated with better longer-term adherence to PAP therapy versus no resupply

The Effect of Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea on Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes

There is uncertainty about the effects of treating obstructive sleep apnea on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. To determine whether treatment of obstructive sleep apnea in patients with type 2 diabetes improves glycemic control. In this trial, we randomized patients with type 2 diabetes and no previous diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea, with a glycated hemoglobin level of 6.5-8.5%, and an oxygen desaturation index of 15 or more events per hour to positive airway pressure therapy or to usual care. A total of 416 patients met the entry criteria as determined by each site and were randomized. Of the 298 participants who met centrally adjudicated entry criteria, no differences between the study groups were seen for change in glycated hemoglobin. Furthermore, there were no between-group differences when analyses were restricted to those with poorer baseline glycemic control, those with more severe sleep apnea, or those who were adherent to therapy. A greater fall in diastolic blood pressure occurred in the positive airway pressure group than in the usual care group (-3.5 mm Hg vs. -1.5 mm Hg; P = 0.07). This difference was significant in those who were adherent to positive airway pressure therapy (-4.4 mm Hg vs. -1.6 mm Hg; P = 0.02). There was a significant reduction in sleepiness in the positive airway pressure therapy group (P < 0.0001). Quality of life assessment revealed improvements in vitality, mental health, and mental component summary scores in the positive airway pressure therapy group. This trial showed no effect of positive airway pressure therapy on glycemic control in patients with relatively well-controlled type 2 diabetes and obstructive sleep apnea. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00509223)

Mild obstructive sleep apnoea in females: <i>post hoc</i> analysis of the MERGE randomised controlled trial.

BackgroundA post hoc analysis of the MERGE trial was conducted, to investigate whether sex differences are evident at the mildest end of the disease spectrum, for symptoms associated with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and the response to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment.MethodsMERGE participants with mild OSA (apnoea-hypopnoea index 5-15 events·h-1; American Academy of Sleep Medicine 2012 criteria) were randomised to either CPAP plus standard care (sleep hygiene counselling) or standard care alone for 3 months. Quality of life (QoL) was measured by questionnaires completed before and after the 3 months. This post hoc analysis of participants of the MERGE trial compared the symptom presentation, and response to CPAP, between the sexes.Results233 patients were included; 71 (30%) were female. Females were more symptomatic at baseline in all QoL questionnaires. Specifically, females had lower 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Vitality scores (mean±sd 39.1±10.1 versus 44.8±10.3) and higher Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) scores (mean±sd 11.0±4.2 versus 9.5±4.4). Both sexes experienced snoring, but more females reported fatigue and more males reported witnessed apnoeas. All symptoms improved with CPAP for both sexes; however, females had larger improvements in SF-36 Vitality scores, which was the primary outcome of the MERGE trial (mean change 9.4 (95% CI 6.8-12.0) versus 6.0 (95% CI 4.3-7.7); p=0.034), and ESS (mean change -4.1 (95% CI -5.1- -3.0) versus -2.5 (95% CI -3.1- -1.8); p=0.015), after adjustment for baseline scores and CPAP usage.ConclusionsSex differences are apparent in patients with mild OSA. Females experience worse QoL symptoms than males at presentation to the sleep clinic; however, these improve significantly with CPAP treatment