13 research outputs found
Bayesian meta-analysis for evaluating treatment effectiveness in biomarker subgroups using trials of mixed patient populations
During drug development, evidence can emerge to suggest a treatment is more
effective in a specific patient subgroup. Whilst early trials may be conducted
in biomarker-mixed populations, later trials are more likely to enrol
biomarker-positive patients alone, thus leading to trials of the same treatment
investigated in different populations. When conducting a meta-analysis, a
conservative approach would be to combine only trials conducted in the
biomarker-positive subgroup. However, this discards potentially useful
information on treatment effects in the biomarker-positive subgroup concealed
within observed treatment effects in biomarker-mixed populations. We extend
standard random-effects meta-analysis to combine treatment effects obtained
from trials with different populations to estimate pooled treatment effects in
a biomarker subgroup of interest. The model assumes a systematic difference in
treatment effects between biomarker-positive and biomarker-negative subgroups,
which is estimated from trials which report either or both treatment effects.
The estimated systematic difference and proportion of biomarker-negative
patients in biomarker-mixed studies are used to interpolate treatment effects
in the biomarker-positive subgroup from observed treatment effects in the
biomarker-mixed population. The developed methods are applied to an
illustrative example in metastatic colorectal cancer and evaluated in a
simulation study. In the example, the developed method resulted in improved
precision of the pooled treatment effect estimate compared to standard
random-effects meta-analysis of trials investigating only biomarker-positive
patients. The simulation study confirmed that when the systematic difference in
treatment effects between biomarker subgroups is not very large, the developed
method can improve precision of estimation of pooled treatment effects while
maintaining low bias
Bridging disconnected networks of first and second lines of biologic therapies in rheumatoid arthritis with registry data : Bayesian evidence synthesis with target trial emulation
We aim to utilise real world data in evidence synthesis to optimise an evidence base for the effectiveness of biologic therapies in rheumatoid arthritis in order to allow for evidence on first-line therapies to inform second-line effectiveness estimates. We use data from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register for Rheumatoid Arthritis (BSRBR-RA) to supplement RCT evidence obtained from the literature, by emulating target trials of treatment sequences to estimate treatment effects in each line of therapy. Treatment effects estimates from the target trials inform a bivariate network meta-analysis (NMA) of first and second-line treatments. Summary data were obtained from 21 trials of biologic therapies including 2 for second-line treatment and results from six emulated target trials of both treatment lines. Bivariate NMA resulted in a decrease in uncertainty around the effectiveness estimates of the second-line therapies, when compared to the results of univariate NMA, and allowed for predictions of treatment effects not evaluated in second-line RCTs. Bivariate NMA provides effectiveness estimates for all treatments in first- and second-line, including predicted effects in second-line where these estimates did not exist in the data. This novel methodology may have further applications, for example for bridging networks of trials in children and adults. [Abstract copyright: Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Bayesian meta-analysis for evaluating treatment effectiveness in biomarker subgroups using trials of mixed patient populations
During drug development, evidence can emerge to suggest a treatment is more effective in a specific patient subgroup. Whilst early trials may be conducted in biomarker-mixed populations, later trials are more likely to enroll biomarker-positive patients alone, thus leading to trials of the same treatment investigated in different populations. When conducting a meta-analysis, a conservative approach would be to combine only trials conducted in the biomarker-positive subgroup. However, this discards potentially useful information on treatment effects in the biomarker-positive subgroup concealed within observed treatment effects in biomarker-mixed populations. We extend standard random-effects meta-analysis to combine treatment effects obtained from trials with different populations to estimate pooled treatment effects in a biomarker subgroup of interest. The model assumes a systematic difference in treatment effects between biomarker-positive and biomarker-negative subgroups, which is estimated from trials which report either or both treatment effects. The systematic difference and proportion of biomarker-negative patients in biomarker-mixed studies are used to interpolate treatment effects in the biomarker-positive subgroup from observed treatment effects in the biomarker-mixed population. The developed methods are applied to an illustrative example in metastatic colorectal cancer and evaluated in a simulation study. In the example, the developed method improved precision of the pooled treatment effect estimate compared with standard random-effects meta-analysis of trials investigating only biomarker-positive patients. The simulation study confirmed that when the systematic difference in treatment effects between biomarker subgroups is not very large, the developed method can improve precision of estimation of pooled treatment effects while maintaining low bias.</p
Using Bayesian Evidence Synthesis Methods to Incorporate Real-World Evidence in Surrogate Endpoint Evaluation.
Objective
Traditionally, validation of surrogate endpoints has been carried out using randomized controlled trial (RCT) data. However, RCT data may be too limited to validate surrogate endpoints. In this article, we sought to improve the validation of surrogate endpoints with the inclusion of real-world evidence (RWE).
Methods
We use data from comparative RWE (cRWE) and single-arm RWE (sRWE) to supplement RCT evidence for the evaluation of progression-free survival (PFS) as a surrogate endpoint to overall survival (OS) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Treatment effect estimates from RCTs, cRWE, and matched sRWE, comparing antiangiogenic treatments with chemotherapy, were used to inform surrogacy patterns and predictions of the treatment effect on OS from the treatment effect on PFS.
Results
Seven RCTs, 4 cRWE studies, and 2 matched sRWE studies were identified. The addition of RWE to RCTs reduced the uncertainty around the estimates of the parameters for the surrogate relationship. The addition of RWE to RCTs also improved the accuracy and precision of predictions of the treatment effect on OS obtained using data on the observed effect on PFS.
Conclusion
The addition of RWE to RCT data improved the precision of the parameters describing the surrogate relationship between treatment effects on PFS and OS and the predicted clinical benefit of antiangiogenic therapies in mCRC.</p
The Validity of Surrogate Endpoints in Sub Groups of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Defined by Treatment Class and KRAS Status
Background and Aim: Findings from the literature suggest that the validity of surrogate endpoints in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) may depend on a treatments’ mechanism of action. We explore this and the impact of Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) status on surrogacy patterns in mCRC. Methods: A systematic review was undertaken to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for pharmacological therapies in mCRC. Bayesian meta-analytic methods for surrogate endpoint evaluation were used to evaluate surrogate relationships across all RCTs, by KRAS status and treatment class. Surrogate endpoints explored were progression free survival (PFS) as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival (OS), and tumour response (TR) as a surrogate for PFS and OS. Results: 66 RCTs were identified from the systematic review. PFS showed a strong surrogate relationship with OS across all data and in subgroups by KRAS status. The relationship appeared stronger within individual treatment classes compared to the overall analysis. The TR-PFS and TR-OS relationships were found to be weak overall but stronger within the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor + Chemotherapy (EGFR + Chemo) treatment class; both overall and in the wild type (WT) patients for TR-PFS, but not in patients with the mutant (MT) KRAS status where data were limited. Conclusions: PFS appeared to be a good surrogate endpoint for OS. TR showed a moderate surrogate relationship with PFS and OS for the EGFR + Chemo treatment class. There was some evidence of impact of the mechanism of action on the strength of the surrogacy patterns in mCRC, but little evidence of the impact of KRAS status on the validity of surrogate endpoints
Bayesian network meta-analysis methods for combining individual participant data and aggregate data from single arm trials and randomised controlled trials
Background: Increasingly in network meta-analysis (NMA), there is a need to incorporate non-randomised evidence to estimate relative treatment effects, and in particular in cases with limited randomised evidence, sometimes resulting in disconnected networks of treatments. When combining different sources of data, complex NMA methods are required to address issues associated with participant selection bias, incorporating single-arm trials (SATs), and synthesising a mixture of individual participant data (IPD) and aggregate data (AD). We develop NMA methods which synthesise data from SATs and randomised controlled trials (RCTs), using a mixture of IPD and AD, for a dichotomous outcome. Methods: We propose methods under both contrast-based (CB) and arm-based (AB) parametrisations, and extend the methods to allow for both within- and across-trial adjustments for covariate effects. To illustrate the methods, we use an applied example investigating the effectiveness of biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We applied the methods to a dataset obtained from a literature review consisting of 14 RCTs and an artificial dataset consisting of IPD from two SATs and AD from 12 RCTs, where the artificial dataset was created by removing the control arms from the only two trials assessing tocilizumab in the original dataset. Results: Without adjustment for covariates, the CB method with independent baseline response parameters (CBunadjInd) underestimated the effectiveness of tocilizumab when applied to the artificial dataset compared to the original dataset, albeit with significant overlap in posterior distributions for treatment effect parameters. The CB method with exchangeable baseline response parameters produced effectiveness estimates in agreement with CBunadjInd, when the predicted baseline response estimates were similar to the observed baseline response. After adjustment for RA duration, there was a reduction in across-trial heterogeneity in baseline response but little change in treatment effect estimates. Conclusions: Our findings suggest incorporating SATs in NMA may be useful in some situations where a treatment is disconnected from a network of comparator treatments, due to a lack of comparative evidence, to estimate relative treatment effects. The reliability of effect estimates based on data from SATs may depend on adjustment for covariate effects, although further research is required to understand this in more detail
Seargeant, Philip
The serial Arbovirus research in Australia consists of the proceedings of the annual conference with the same title.Arbovirus encephalitis acquired within Australia, also known as Australian encephalitis (AE), is a potentially fatal disease of humans usually caused by the mosquito-borne flavivirus Murray Valley encephalitis virus (MVE). Occasional cases have been caused by the closely related Kunjin virus (KUN) but these tend to be less severe and the disease is now usually referred to as Kunjin virus disease. These viruses are usually active in northern Australia during the wet season (December to May) and MVE is known to be enzootic in the north Kimberley region of Western Australia (WA) and in the Top End of the Northern Territory (NT). Culex annulirostris skuse is the major vector of both MVE and KUN and ardeid waterbirds are thought to be the main vertebrate hosts. During the 2000 wet season, northern and central Australia experienced exceptional weather conditions with record rainfall recorded in many areas. This led to extensive mosquito breeding, increased MVE transmission in the region and resulted in a number of MVE and KUN encephalitis cases being recorded from both WA and central Australia (southern NT and northern South Australia). An overview of the environmental conditions leading to this outbreak, vector numbers, results of sentinel chicken monitoring programs, symptoms and outcome of confirmed cases, and predictors for future outbreaks are presented in this paper.The Division of Animal Health of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, CSIR
An outbreak of Australian encephalitis in Western Australia and central Australia (Northern Territory and South Australia) during the 2000 wet season
The serial Arbovirus research in Australia consists of the proceedings of the annual conference with the same title.Arbovirus encephalitis acquired within Australia, also known as Australian encephalitis (AE), is a potentially fatal disease of humans usually caused by the mosquito-borne flavivirus Murray Valley encephalitis virus (MVE). Occasional cases have been caused by the closely related Kunjin virus (KUN) but these tend to be less severe and the disease is now usually referred to as Kunjin virus disease. These viruses are usually active in northern Australia during the wet season (December to May) and MVE is known to be enzootic in the north Kimberley region of Western Australia (WA) and in the Top End of the Northern Territory (NT). Culex annulirostris skuse is the major vector of both MVE and KUN and ardeid waterbirds are thought to be the main vertebrate hosts. During the 2000 wet season, northern and central Australia experienced exceptional weather conditions with record rainfall recorded in many areas. This led to extensive mosquito breeding, increased MVE transmission in the region and resulted in a number of MVE and KUN encephalitis cases being recorded from both WA and central Australia (southern NT and northern South Australia). An overview of the environmental conditions leading to this outbreak, vector numbers, results of sentinel chicken monitoring programs, symptoms and outcome of confirmed cases, and predictors for future outbreaks are presented in this paper.The Division of Animal Health of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, CSIR
An outbreak of Australian encephalitis in Western Australia and central Australia (Northern Territory and South Australia) during the 2000 wet season
The serial Arbovirus research in Australia consists of the proceedings of the annual conference with the same title