The road goes ever on:innovations and paradigm shifts in atrial fibrillation management

Item does not contain fulltex

Special Issue:Latest Advances in Delivery and Outcomes of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Conduction System Pacing

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) is an established technique to improve morbidity and mortality in selected heart failure patients [...].</p

Electro-energetics of Biventricular, Septal and Conduction System Pacing

Abnormal electrical activation of the ventricles creates abnormalities in cardiac mechanics. Local contraction patterns, as reflected by strain, are not only out of phase, but also show opposing length changes in early and late activated regions. Consequently, the efficiency of cardiac pump function (the amount of stroke work generated by a unit of oxygen consumed), is approximately 30% lower in dyssynchronous than in synchronous hearts. Maintaining good cardiac efficiency appears important for long-term outcomes. Biventricular, left ventricular septal, His bundle and left bundle branch pacing may minimise the amount of pacing-induced dyssynchrony and efficiency loss when compared to conventional right ventricular pacing. An extensive animal study indicates maintenance of mechanical synchrony and efficiency during left ventricular septal pacing and data from a few clinical studies support the idea that this is also the case for left bundle branch pacing and His bundle pacing. This review discusses electro-mechanics and mechano-energetics under the various paced conditions and provides suggestions for future research

Novel bradycardia pacing strategies

Contains fulltext : 229186.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access)The adverse effects of ventricular dyssynchrony induced by right ventricular (RV) pacing has led to alternative pacing strategies, such as biventricular, His bundle (HBP), LV septal (LVSP) and left bundle branch pacing (LBBP). Given the overlap, LVSP and LBBP are also collectively referred to as left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP). Although among these alternative pacing sites HBP is theoretically the ideal strategy as it maintains a physiological ventricular activation, its application requires more skills and is associated with the most complications. LBBAP, where the ventricular pacing lead is advanced through the interventricular septum to its left side, creates ventricular activation that is only slightly more dyssynchronous. Preliminary studies have shown that LBBAP is feasible, safe and encounters less limitations than HBP. Further studies are needed to differentiate between LVSP and LBBP with regard to acute functional and long-term clinical outcome

Outcomes of conduction system pacing compared to right ventricular pacing as a primary strategy for treating bradyarrhythmia: systematic review and meta-analysis

Background Right ventricular pacing (RVP) may cause electrical and mechanical desynchrony leading to impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We investigated the outcomes of RVP with His bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) for patients requiring a de novo permanent pacemaker (PPM) for bradyarrhythmia. Methods and results Systematic review of randomized clinical trials and observational studies comparing HBP or LBP with RVP for de novo PPM implantation between 01 January 2013 and 17 November 2020 was performed. Random and fixed effects meta-analyses of the effect of pacing technology on outcomes were performed. Study outcomes included all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization (HFH), LVEF, QRS duration, lead revision, atrial fibrillation, procedure parameters, and pacing metrics. Overall, 9 studies were included (6 observational, 3 randomised). HBP compared with RVP was associated with decreased HFH (risk ratio [RR] 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49–0.94), preservation of LVEF (mean difference [MD] 0.81, 95% CI − 1.23 to 2.85 vs. − 5.72, 95% CI − 7.64 to -3.79), increased procedure duration (MD 15.17 min, 95% CI 11.30–19.04), and increased lead revisions (RR 5.83, 95% CI 2.17–15.70, p = 0.0005). LBBP compared with RVP was associated with shorter paced QRS durations (MD 5.6 ms, 95% CI − 6.4 to 17.6) vs. (51.0 ms, 95% CI 39.2–62.9) and increased procedure duration (MD 37.78 min, 95% CI 20.04–55.51). Conclusion Of the limited studies published, this meta-analysis found that HBP and LBBP were superior to RVP in maintaining physiological ventricular activation as an initial pacing strategy

Heart Size Corrected Electrical Dyssynchrony and Its Impact on Sex-specific Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Background - Women are less likely to receive cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), yet, they are more responsive to the therapy and respond at shorter QRS duration. The present study hypothesized that a relatively larger left ventricular (LV) electrical dyssynchrony in smaller hearts contributes to the better CRT response in women. For this the vectorcardiography-derived QRS area is used, since it allows for a more detailed quantification of electrical dyssynchrony compared to conventional electrocardiographic markers. Methods - Data from a multicenter registry of 725 CRT patients (median follow-up: 4.2 years [IQR: 2.7-6.1]) were analyzed. Baseline electrical dyssynchrony was evaluated using the QRS area, and the corrected QRS area for heart size using the LV end-diastolic volume (QRSarea/LVEDV). Impact of the QRSarea/LVEDV-ratio on the association between sex and LV reverse remodeling (end-systolic volume change: ΔLVESV) and sex and the composite outcome of all-cause mortality, LV assist device implantation or heart transplantation was assessed. Results - At baseline, women (n=228) displayed larger electrical dyssynchrony than men (QRS area: 132±55μVs vs 123±58μVs, p=0.043) which was, even more pronounced for the QRSarea/LVEDV-ratio (0.76±0.46μVs/ml vs 0.57±0.34μVs/ml, p<0.001). After multivariable analyses female sex was associated with ΔLVESV (β 0.12, p=0.003) and a lower occurrence the composite outcome (HR 0.59 (0.42-0.85), p=0.004). A part of the female advantage regarding reverse remodeling was attributed to the larger QRSarea/LVEDV-ratio in women (25-fold change in Beta from 0.12 to 0.09). The larger QRSarea/LVEDV-ratio did not contribute to the better survival observed in women. In both volumetric responders and non-responders, female sex remained strongly associated with a lower risk of the composite outcome (adjusted HR 0.59 (0.36-0.97), p=0.036 and 0.55 (0.33-0.90), p=0.018, respectively). Conclusions - Greater electrical dyssynchrony in smaller hearts contributes in part to more reverse remodeling observed in women after CRT, but this does not explain their better long-term outcomes

Reduction in the QRS area after cardiac resynchronization therapy is associated with survival and echocardiographic response

Introduction Recent studies have shown that the baseline QRS area is associated with the clinical response after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). In this study, we investigated the association of QRS area reduction ( increment QRS area) after CRT with the outcome. We hypothesize that a larger increment QRS area is associated with a better survival and echocardiographic response. Methods and Results Electrocardiograms (ECG) obtained before and 2-12 months after CRT from 1299 patients in a multi-center CRT-registry were analyzed. The QRS area was calculated from vectorcardiograms that were synthesized from 12-lead ECGs. The primary endpoint was a combination of all-cause mortality, heart transplantation, and left ventricular (LV) assist device implantation. The secondary endpoint was the echocardiographic response, defined as LV end-systolic volume reduction >= of 15%. Patients with increment QRS area above the optimal cut-off value (62 mu Vs) had a lower risk of reaching the primary endpoint (hazard ratio: 0.43; confidence interval [CI] 0.33-0.56, p = 109 mu Vs, survival, and echocardiographic response were better when the increment QRS area was >= 62 mu Vs (p = 109 mu Vs, increment QRS area was the only significant predictor of survival (OR: 0.981; CI: 0.967-0.994, p = .006). Conclusion increment QRS area is an independent determinant of CRT response, especially in patients with a large baseline QRS area. Failure to achieve a large QRS area reduction with CRT is associated with a poor clinical outcome

Association of ECG characteristics with clinical and echocardiographic outcome to CRT in a non-LBBB patient population

Purpose: Effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients without left bundle branch block (non-LBBB) QRS morphology is limited. Additional selection criteria are needed to identify these patients. Methods: Seven hundred ninety consecutive patients with non-LBBB morphology, who received a CRT-device in 3 university centers in the Netherlands, were selected. Pre-implantation 12-lead ECGs were evaluated on morphology, duration, and area of the QRS complex, as well as on PR interval, left ventricular activation time (LVAT), and the presence of fragmented QRS (fQRS). Association of these ECG features with the primary endpoint: a combination of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, cardiac transplantation and all-cause mortality, and secondary endpoint—echocardiographic reduction of left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV)—were evaluated. Results: The primary endpoint occurred more often in non-LBBB patients with with PR interval ≥ 230ms, QRS area < 109μVs, and with fQRS. Multivariable regression analysis showed independent associations of QRS area (HR 2.33 [1.44, 3.77], p = 0.001) and PR interval (HR 2.03 [1.51, 2.74], p < 0.001) only. Mean LVESV reduction was significantly lower in patients with baseline RBBB, QRS duration < 150 ms, PR interval ≥ 230 ms, and in QRS area < 109 μVs. Multivariable regression analyses only showed significant associations between QRS area ≥ 109 μVs (OR 2.00 [1.09, 3.66] p = 0.025) and probability of echocardiographic response to CRT. Conclusions: In the heterogeneous non-LBBB patient population, QRS area and PR prolongation rather than traditional QRS duration and morphology are associated to both clinical and echocardiographic outcomes of CRT