131 research outputs found

    The future of robotic surgery

    Get PDF
    © 2018 Royal College of Surgeons.For 20 years Intuitive Surgical’s da Vinci® system has held the monopoly in minimally invasive robotic surgery. Restrictive patenting, a well-developed marketing strategy and a high-quality product have protected the company’s leading market share.1 However, owing to the nuances of US patenting law, many of Intuitive Surgical’s earliest patents will be expiring in the next couple of years. With such a shift in backdrop, many of Intuitive Surgical’s competitors (from medical and industrial robotic backgrounds) have initiated robotic programmes – some of which are available for clinical use now. The next section of the review will focus on new and developing robotic systems in the field of minimally invasive surgery (Table 1), single-site surgery (Table 2), natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and non-minimally invasive robotic systems (Table 3).Peer reviewedFinal Published versio

    Biomarkers in Bladder Cancer Survellance

    Get PDF
    © 2021 Sugeeta, Sharma, Ng, Nayak and Vasdev. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.735868Aim: This is a narrative review with an aim to summarise and describe urinary biomarkers in the surveillance of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). It provides a summary of FDA-approved protein biomarkers along with emerging ones which utilise genetic, epigenetic and exosomal markers. We discuss the current limitations of the available assays. Background: Current guidelines advice a combination of cystoscopy, imaging, and urine cytology in diagnosis and surveillance. Although cytology has a high specificity, it is limited by low sensitivity particularly in low grade tumours. There are six FDA-approved urinary assays for diagnosis and surveillance of bladder cancer. They have shown to improve sensitivity and specificity to be used alongside cytology and cystoscopy but have a lower specificity in comparison to cytology and false positives often occur in benign conditions. Recent developments in laboratory techniques has allowed for use of markers which are RNA-, DNA-based as well as extracellular vesicles in the past decade. Methods: Using the PubMed/Medline search engines as well as Google Scholar, we performed an online search using the terms “bladder cancer,” “non-muscle invasive bladder cancer,” and “urine biomarkers” with filter for articles in English published up to May 2021. Systematic reviews and original data of clinical trials or observational studies which contributed to the development of the biomarkers were collated. Results: Biomarkers identified were divided into FDA-approved molecular biomarkers, protein biomarkers and gene-related biomarker with a table summarising the findings of each marker with the most relevant studies. The studies conducted were mainly retrospective. Due to the early stages of development, only a few prospective studies have been done for more recently developed biomarkers and limited meta-analyses are available. Therefore a detailed evaluation of these markers are still required to decide on their clinical use. Conclusion: Advancements of analytical methods in BC has driven the research towards non-invasive liquid-based biomarkers in adjunct to urine cytology. Further large prospective studies are required to determine its feasibility in a clinical setting as they are not effective when used in isolation as they have their limitation. With the ongoing pandemic, other than reduction in costs and increased accuracy, the need for biomarkers to cope with delay in cystoscopies in diagnosis and surveillance is crucial. Thus clinical trials with direct comparison is required to improve patient care.Peer reviewe

    Chronic Prostatitis / Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome

    Get PDF

    A systematic review of the harmful effects of surgical smoke inhalation on operating room personnel

    Get PDF
    © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)Background Surgical smoke refers to the plume produced by usage of energy-generating surgical equipment on tissues. This review aimed to assess the potential of this smoke to be a serious occupational hazard to theatre staff due to its composition, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. Method A search of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed databases was undertaken for publications reporting plume composition, presence of infectious material, carcinogenic potential and comparisons between production in laparoscopic versus open surgery. All human in-vivo and ex-vivo primary studies were included, provided English language translation was available. A narrative synthesis was conducted due to the methodologic heterogeneity of the studies. Results 25 studies resulted from the primary search, and an additional 3 from cross-referencing, leading to 28 included studies. Studies addressing particle size found that smoke particles were respirable in size. Viral DNA was present in 3 studies, while 1 study demonstrated the ability for surgical smoke to produce clinically important infection. Chemical composition was explored in 8 studies, revealing the presence of carcinogenic compounds in concentrations above occupational safety limits. Open surgery was found to generally produce less smoke than laparoscopic. Conclusion Surgical smoke contains a myriad of hazardous constituents, such as carcinogenic compounds and infectious materials, however, the extent to which inhalation of these plumes may be harmful remains unknown due to the lack of high-level evidence regarding infectivity and carcinogenicity. Safety measures such as extraction of plumes using local exhaust ventilation, and usage of protective equipment such as N95 masks should be instilled.Peer reviewe

    Technical caveats in salvage robot assisted radical prostatectomy

    Get PDF
    Copyright: Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.Peer reviewe

    Has robotic prostatectomy determined the fall of the laparoscopic approach?

    Get PDF
    © The Author(s) 2021. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy (RALP) has revolutionised the surgical management of localised Prostate Cancer in the modern era. The surgeon is provided with greater precision, more versatile dexterity and an immersive three-dimensional visual field. The impressive hardware facilitates, for example, the dissection of the peri-prostatic fascia, whilst preserving the neurovascular bundle, or the suturing of the vesico-urethral anastomosis. Prior to RALP, Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy (LRP) represented the first venture into the minimally invasive world. Associated with more cumbersome ergonomics, LRP has a significant learning curve when compared with the robotic approach. There has been a paucity, until recently, of high-quality literature comparing outcomes between the two operations, including the attainment of the Pentafecta of survivorship: biochemical recurrence-free, continence, potency, no postoperative complications and negative surgical margins.Peer reviewedFinal Published versio

    Review of the evidence for robotic-assisted robotic cystectomy and intra-corporeal urinary diversion in bladder cancer

    Get PDF
    Funding Information: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi. org/10.21037/tau.2019.12.19). The series “Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer” was commissioned by the editorial office without any funding or sponsorship. Dr. Decaestecker reports personal fees and non-financial support from Intuitive Surgical, personal fees and non financial support Publisher Copyright: © Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved. Copyright: Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.Radical cystectomy, pelvic lymph node dissection and urinary diversion is the gold-standard treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. The surgery is both complex and highly morbid. Robotic cystectomy is now in its 16th year with established techniques and sufficient research maturity to enable comparison with its open counterpart. The present review focuses on the current evidence for robotic cystectomy and assesses various metrics including oncological, perioperative, functional, surgeon-specific and cost outcomes. The review also encapsulates the current evidence for intra-corporeal urinary diversion and its current status in the cystectomy arena.Peer reviewe

    Guideline of Guidelines: Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer

    Get PDF
    © 2020 Turkish Society of Urology. Final publication available at https://dx.doi.org/10.5152/tud.2020.20337.Muscle-invasive bladder cancer accounts for 25% of bladder cancer cases and represents a spectrum of disease, which can result in significant morbidity and mortality for anyone affected. Current management has evolved through years of research and clinical practice. It is based on a risk-benefit approach, which is often tailored to the individual requirements of patients and involves cystectomy, neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies, and multimodal surveillance paradigms to achieve high survival rates. Multiple guidelines exist to assist the clinicians in this decision-making process, but their adherence is often variable. In this article, we aimed to review the 4 most commonly used guidelines from the European Association of Urology, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and the American Urological Association.Peer reviewe
    • …
    corecore