Multifocal invasive ductal breast cancer with osteoclast-like giant cells: a case report

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Introduction</p> <p>To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report of a multifocal (trifocal) invasive carcinoma of the breast containing osteoclast-like giant cells.</p> <p>Case presentation</p> <p>A 64-year-old Caucasian woman presented for routine mammography screening with three radiodense lesions in the lower inner quadrant of the right breast, a primary breast cancer. Microscopic examination showed three foci of invasive ductal carcinoma with multinucleated osteoclast-like giant cells. Osteoclast-like giant cells in breast cancer are a rare phenomenon. They are described in less than two percent of all breast cancers and occur in association with invasive ductal cancer and invasive lobular cancer. In addition, osteoclast-like giant cells have been described in several sarcomas and metaplastic carcinomas of the breast.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a multifocal infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast containing osteoclast-like giant cells. This could be an indication for a possible early event in carcinogenesis associated with a biological event or secretion that indicates the differentiation and/or migration of stromal cells or macrophages.</p

Anastrozole versus tamoxifen for the prevention of locoregional and contralateral breast cancer in postmenopausal women with locally excised ductal carcinoma in situ (IBIS-II DCIS): a double-blind, randomised controlled trial

Background Third-generation aromatase inhibitors are more effective than tamoxifen for preventing recurrence in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive invasive breast cancer. However, it is not known whether anastrozole is more effective than tamoxifen for women with hormone-receptor-positive ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Here, we compare the efficacy of anastrozole with that of tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive DCIS. Methods In a double-blind, multicentre, randomised placebo-controlled trial, we recruited women who had been diagnosed with locally excised, hormone-receptor-positive DCIS. Eligible women were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio by central computer allocation to receive 1 mg oral anastrozole or 20 mg oral tamoxifen every day for 5 years. Randomisation was stratified by major centre or hub and was done in blocks (six, eight, or ten). All trial personnel, participants, and clinicians were masked to treatment allocation and only the trial statistician had access to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was all recurrence, including recurrent DCIS and new contralateral tumours. All analyses were done on a modified intention-to-treat basis (in all women who were randomised and did not revoke consent for their data to be included) and proportional hazard models were used to compute hazard ratios and corresponding confidence intervals. This trial is registered at the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN37546358. Results Between March 3, 2003, and Feb 8, 2012, we enrolled 2980 postmenopausal women from 236 centres in 14 countries and randomly assigned them to receive anastrozole (1449 analysed) or tamoxifen (1489 analysed). Median follow-up was 7·2 years (IQR 5·6–8·9), and 144 breast cancer recurrences were recorded. We noted no statistically significant difference in overall recurrence (67 recurrences for anastrozole vs 77 for tamoxifen; HR 0·89 [95% CI 0·64–1·23]). The non-inferiority of anastrozole was established (upper 95% CI <1·25), but its superiority to tamoxifen was not (p=0·49). A total of 69 deaths were recorded (33 for anastrozole vs 36 for tamoxifen; HR 0·93 [95% CI 0·58–1·50], p=0·78), and no specific cause was more common in one group than the other. The number of women reporting any adverse event was similar between anastrozole (1323 women, 91%) and tamoxifen (1379 women, 93%); the side-effect profiles of the two drugs differed, with more fractures, musculoskeletal events, hypercholesterolaemia, and strokes with anastrozole and more muscle spasm, gynaecological cancers and symptoms, vasomotor symptoms, and deep vein thromboses with tamoxifen. Conclusions No clear efficacy differences were seen between the two treatments. Anastrozole offers another treatment option for postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive DCIS, which may be be more appropriate for some women with contraindications for tamoxifen. Longer follow-up will be necessary to fully evaluate treatment differences

Final results from the prospective phase III WSG-ARA trial: impact of adjuvant darbepoetin alfa on event-free survival in early breast cancer

Background: WSG-ARA plus trial evaluated the effect of adjuvant darbepoetin alfa (DA) on outcome in node positive primary breast cancer (BC). Patients and methods: One thousand two hundred thirty-four patients were randomized to chemotherapy either with DA (DA+; n = 615) or without DA (DA-; n = 619). DA (500 mu g q3w) was started at hemoglobin (Hb) levels = 14.0 g/dl (12 g/dl after label amendment). Primary efficacy end point was event-free survival (EFS); secondary end points were toxicity, quality of life (QoL) and overall survival (OS). Results: Venous thrombosis (DA+: 3.0%, DA-: 1.0%; P = 0.013) was significantly higher for DA+, but not pulmonary embolism (0.3% in both arms). Median Hb levels were stable in DA+ (12.6 g/dl) and decreased in DA-(11.7 g/dl). Hb levels > 15 g/dl were reported in 0.8% of cycles. QoL parameters did not significantly differ between arms. At 39 months, DA had no significant impact on EFS (DA+: 89.3%, DA-: 87.5%; Plog-rank = 0.55) or OS (DA+: 95.5%, DA-: 95.4%; Plog-rank = 0.77). Conclusions: DA treatment did not impact EFS or OS in routine adjuvant BC treatment

Risk Group Selection in Primary Breast Cancer According to ASCO Recommended Biomarkers Onkotype DX and uPA/PAI-1: First Experience from Prospective Multicenter WSG Plan B Trial

Abstract Background: Both the Oncotype DX multi-gene assay and invasion factors uPA/PAI-1 are guideline-recommended (ASCO, AGO) biomarkers for decision support regarding adjuvant chemotherapy in primary breast cancer (BC). Material and Methods: The West German Study Group (WSG) Plan B trial (planned n=2,448) is evaluating anthracyline-free adjuvant chemotherapy (6x TC) vs. standard 4xEC-4xDOC in HER2- negative BC with 0-3 positive lymph nodes, Oncotype DX is used as selection criterion where pts with RS&amp;gt; 11 are randomized to one of the two chemotherapy arms and pts with RS ≥11 treated with hormonal therapy alone. uPA/PAI-1 (both low vs. either/both high), measured by ELISA, is obtained as an optional risk factor. Results: By June 2010, 1064 patients had been randomized in Plan B (96 recruiting centers). In 153 patients (27 centers), uPA and PAI-1 had been measured; for 131 (84 N0, 47 N+) of these, Oncotype DX Recurrence Score® (RS) results were also available. When considered as continuous variables, RS was weakly positively correlated (Spearman's coefficient) with uPA (rs=0.18, p=0.04) and with PAI-1 (rs=0.23, p=0.01). When considered as risk categories/(Table 1), there was a weak concordance between RS and uPA/PAI-1, using either the standard RS cutoff points (18 and 30) or the TAILORx trial cutoff points (11 and 25). Table T: Association between RS and uPA/PAI-1 categories Assignment of high risk was most strongly concordant between uPA/PAI-1 and RS (RS &amp;gt; 25: 22/25 patients had high uPA/PAI-1; RS &amp;gt;30: 14/15 patients had high uPA/PAI-1). This high-risk concordance extends to N0 patients (RS&amp;gt;25: 17/19 N0 pts had high uPA/PAI-1; RS&amp;gt;30: 11/12 pts had high uPA/PAI-1). Discussion: For the first time, risk groups in primary breast cancer according to both Oncotype DX and uPA/PAI-1 have been compared. These preliminary data show that the high RS group seems highly concordant with the prospectively assessed invasion markers uPA/PAI-1. However, within low and intermediate RS, uPA/PAI-1 could still identify a substantial collective at risk; low uPA/PAI-1 could define a clinically relevant low-risk collective within risk groups that would be classified as “intermediate” according to the multigene assay Oncotype DX. Additional recruitment and outcome assessment of the ongoing multicenter WSG Plan B trial will address the clinical significance of these findings. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-09-05.</jats:p