Nuclear and Division-Plane Positioning Revealed by Optical Micromanipulation

SummaryThe position of the division plane affects cell shape and size, as well as tissue organization. Cells of the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe have a centrally placed nucleus and divide by fission at the cell center. Microtubules (MTs) are required for the central position of the nucleus [1–4]. Genetic studies lead to the hypothesis that the position of the nucleus may determine the position of the division plane [5–10]. Alternatively, the division plane may be positioned by the spindle or by morphogen gradients or reaction diffusion mechanisms [7, 11]. Here, we investigate the role of MTs in nuclear positioning and the role of the nucleus in division-plane positioning by displacing the nucleus with optical tweezers. A displaced nucleus returned to the cell center by MT pushing against the cell tips. Nuclear displacement during interphase or early prophase resulted in asymmetric cell division, whereas displacement during prometaphase resulted in symmetric division as in unmanipulated cells. These results suggest that the division plane is specified by the predividing nucleus. Because the yeast nucleus is centered by MTs during interphase but not in mitosis, we hypothesize that the establishment of the division plane at the beginning of mitosis is an optimal mechanism for accurate symmetric division in these cells

Mechanism of nuclear movements in a multinucleated cell

Multinucleated cells are important in many organisms, but the mechanisms governing the movements of nuclei sharing a common cytoplasm are not understood. In the hyphae of the plant pathogenic fungus Ashbya gossypii, nuclei move back and forth, occasionally bypassing each other, preventing the formation of nuclear clusters. This is essential for genetic stability. These movements depend on cytoplasmic microtubules emanating from the nuclei that are pulled by dynein motors anchored at the cortex. Using three-dimensional stochastic simulations with parameters constrained by the literature, we predict the cortical anchor density from the characteristics of nuclear movements. The model accounts for the complex nuclear movements seen in vivo, using a minimal set of experimentally determined ingredients. Of interest, these ingredients power the oscillations of the anaphase spindle in budding yeast, but in A. gossypii, this system is not restricted to a specific nuclear cycle stage, possibly as a result of adaptation to hyphal growth and multinuclearity