84 research outputs found

    Energy aspects and ventilation of food retail buildings

    Get PDF
    Worldwide the food system is responsible for 33% of greenhouse gas emissions. It is estimated that by 2050, the total food production should be 70% more than current food production levels. In the UK, food chain is responsible for around 18% of final energy use and 20% of GHG emissions. Estimates indicate that energy savings of the order of 50% are achievable in food chains by appropriate technology changes in food production, processing, packaging, transportation, and consumption. Ventilation and infiltration account for a significant percentage of the energy use in food retail (supermarkets) and catering facilities such as restaurants and drink outlets. In addition, environmental conditions to maintain indoor air quality and comfort for the users with minimum energy use for such buildings are of primary importance for the business owners and designers. In particular, supermarkets and restaurants present design and operational challenges because the heating ventilation and air-conditioning system has some unique and diverse conditions that it must handle. This paper presents current information on energy use in food retail and catering facilities and continues by focusing on the role of ventilation strategies in food retail supermarkets. It presents the results of current studies in the UK where operational low carbon supermarkets are predicted to save 66% of CO2 emissions compared to a base case store. It shows that low energy ventilation strategies ranging from improved envelope air-tightness, natural ventilation components, reduction of specific fan power, ventilative cooling, novel refrigeration systems using CO2 combined with ventilation heat recovery and storage with phase change materials can lead to significant savings with attractive investment return

    Evaluation of Supermarket Energy Use and Emissions with Various Technology Options

    Get PDF
    In this paper, an operational supermarket in the UK has been selected to be modelled by the previously developed supermarket energy simulation software ‘SuperSIM’. Detailed information of the supermarket and model development procedures are explained. The model was previously validated through comparisons with site measurements of space air temperature and humidity and energy consumptions. It is therefore used to simulate, quantify and evaluate supermarket energy performance at various technology options in terms of heat recovery from refrigerant discharge, high efficiency condensers and evaporators and store locations etc

    Environmental impacts of vapour compression and cryogenic transport refrigeration technologies for temperature controlled food distribution

    Get PDF
    Cryogenic transport refrigeration systems using Liquid Carbon Dioxide or Liquid Nitrogen are proposed as good alternatives to current vapour compression transport refrigeration units powered by auxiliary diesel engines due to their potential for lower environmental impacts and rapid cooling capability. This paper analyses the greenhouse gas emissions of cryogenic and diesel driven vapour compression refrigeration systems for two different temperature controlled lorry sizes and a number of chilled and frozen food products. Both the production and operation emissions have been considered. The results showed that the production emissions of diesel and refrigerant in the vapour compression system can be up to 66% lower than the production emissions of cryogens. However, when taking total emissions into consideration, emissions from all three transport refrigeration technologies are fairly similar and within the margin of error of the assumptions made. The major disadvantage of cryogenic systems is their much higher mass intensity (20 to 60. kg/h), defined as the mass of liquid cryogen per mass of product transported per km, which is almost 10 times higher than that of diesel (2.0-4.0 l/h). This limits their food distribution range per cryogenic fluid tank and together with lack of refilling infrastructure present a barrier to the wider adoption of cryogenic systems for temperature controlled food distribution.The work presented in this paper received funding from the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) through grant No: EP/K011820/1 and the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), project Number FO405. The authors acknowledge the financial support from the Research Councils’ UK Energy Programme and DEFRA. All data used in the study and results are provided in full in the results section of this paper
    • …
    corecore