36 research outputs found
STarT Back Tool.
<p>Response options for items 1–8 are “disagree” (0 points) or “agree” (1 point). Responses to item 9 are on a scale of 1–5: “not at all,” “slightly,” “moderately,” “very much,” or “extremely.” The first three options (“not at all,” “slightly,” and “moderately”) are scored as 0, and the remaining two options (“very much” and “extremely”) are scored as 1. Items 1–4 constitute the physical subscale. Items 5–9 constitute the psychosocial subscale.</p
Spearman’s correlation coefficients for the STarT-J and related measures.
<p>Spearman’s correlation coefficients for the STarT-J and related measures.</p
Mean number of absences for the three STarT-J risk groups.
<p>The linear trend was tested using the Jonckheere-Terpstra test (p < 0.0001). STarT-J: The Japanese version of the STarT Back Tool.</p
Mean STarT-J scores for participants with different numbers of somatic symptoms.
<p>The linear trend was tested using the Jonckheere-Terpstra test (p < 0.0001). STarT-J: The Japanese version of the STarT Back Tool. Number of somatic symptoms was assessed by the Brief Symptom Inventory somatization scale: a response of “moderately,” “quite a bit,” or “extremely” to an item was interpreted as the presence of that somatic symptom, and thus counted.</p
STarT Back Tool.
<p>Response options for items 1–8 are “disagree” (0 points) or “agree” (1 point). Responses to item 9 are on a scale of 1–5: “not at all,” “slightly,” “moderately,” “very much,” or “extremely.” The first three options (“not at all,” “slightly,” and “moderately”) are scored as 0, and the remaining two options (“very much” and “extremely”) are scored as 1. Items 1–4 constitute the physical subscale. Items 5–9 constitute the psychosocial subscale.</p
Participant characteristics: psychometric testing of the STarT-J (n = 2000).
<p>Participant characteristics: psychometric testing of the STarT-J (n = 2000).</p
Score distribution of STarT-J items and risk group distribution (n = 2000).
<p>Score distribution of STarT-J items and risk group distribution (n = 2000).</p
Association between workaholism and depressive mood (N = 3,899).
<p>OR: Odds Ratio; CI: Confidence Interval.</p
Association between workaholism and disabling back pain (N = 3,899).
<p>OR: Odds Ratio; CI: Confidence Interval.</p