IMPORTANCE OF VISUAL INFORMATION AT CHANGE IN MOTION DIRECTION ON DEPTH PERCEPTION

This paper demonstrates the importance of visual information on depth perception from monocular motion parallax presented at the time of change in the motion direction of head and stimulus movements. In head-tracking systems, a longer delay time between the head and stimulus movements degrades the depth perception from monocular motion parallax. Because this delay is noticeable at this time, we hypothesized that the visual information given at the time of the direction change plays a critical role in the depth perception from motion parallax. We evaluated depth perception from monocular motion parallax with and without a visual stimulus at the time of the motion direction change to confirm our hypothesis, and clarified that stable and unambiguous depth can be perceived by presenting the change of the stimulus motion direction. We also demonstrated that it is the change in motion direction itself that is important rather than the temporal stop between deceleration and acceleration of the stimulus motion

926-24 Clinical and Electrophysiological Characteristics in Patients with Exercise Induced Idiopathic Multiform Ventricular Tachycardia. Differential Effects of Atrial Pacing and Isoproterenol Infusion on QTc Interval and Induction of Ventricular Arrhythmia

Idiopathic multiform ventricular tachycardia (VT) is characterized by normal QT interval at restand 3 or more distinct QRS configuration during VT, which has been distinguished from torsade de pointes in long QT syndrome. Facilitation by exercise and suppression by β-antagonist of this VT suggest that it may depend on rapid heart rate (HR) or increased sympathetic tone. To determine which factors is responsible, we performed atrial pacing (120/min) and isoproterenol (ISP) infusion (0.5 or 1.0μg to attain HR 120/min) in 6 patients (2 males/4 females, mean 15.8 years) and 10 control (4 males/6 females, mean 22.8 years). Inducibility of premature ventricular contraction (PVC) or VT, and response of QTc interval (QT/√RR) were evaluated during the procedures.controlmultiform VTp valuePVCNT inductionAtrial pacing0/71/6n.s.Isoproterenol0/86/60.001OTc (secl/2)Rest0.40±0.02 (n=10)0.40±0.03n.s.Atrial pacing0.43±0.02 (n=7)0.47±003<0.01Isoproterenol0.44±0.01 (n=8)0.50±0.05<0.001ConclusionAlthough both rapid HR and increased sympathetic tone may be responsible for this VT, contribution of the latter is predominant. Differential response of QT interval to atrial pacing and isoproterenol infusion may have a possible role for the occurrence of this VT

Sympathetic stimulation produces a greater increase in both transmural and spatial dispersion of repolarization in LQT1 than LQT2 forms of congenital long QT syndrome

AbstractOBJECTIVESThe study compared the influence of sympathetic stimulation on transmural and spatial dispersion of repolarization between LQT1 and LQT2 forms of congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS).BACKGROUNDCardiac events are more associated with sympathetic stimulation in LQT1 than in LQT2 or LQT3 syndrome. Experimental studies have suggested that the interval between Tpeak and Tend (Tp-e) in the electrocardiogram (ECG) reflects transmural dispersion of repolarization across the ventricular wall.METHODSWe recorded 87-lead body-surface ECGs before and after epinephrine infusion (0.1 μg/kg/min) in 13 LQT1, 6 LQT2, and 7 control patients. The Q-Tend (QT-e), Q-Tpeak (QT-p), and Tp-e were measured automatically from 87-lead ECGs, corrected by Bazett’s method (QTc-e, QTc-p, Tcp-e), and averaged among all 87-leads and among 24-leads, which reflect the potential from the left ventricular free wall. As an index of spatial dispersion of repolarization, the dispersion of QTc-e (QTc-eD) and QTc-p (QTc-pD) were obtained among 87-leads and among 24-leads, and were defined as the interval between the maximum and the minimum of the QTc-e and the QTc-p, respectively.RESULTSEpinephrine significantly increased the mean QTc-e but not the mean QTc-p, resulting in a significant increase in the mean Tcp-e in both LQT1 and LQT2, but not in control patients. The epinephrine-induced increases in the mean QTc-e and Tcp-e were larger in LQT1 than in LQT2, and were more pronounced when the averaged data were obtained from 24-leads than from 87-leads. Epinephrine increased the maximum QTc-e but not the minimum QTc-e, producing a significant increase in the QTc-eD in both LQT1 and LQT2 patients, but not in control patients. The increase in the QTc-eD was larger in LQT1 than in LQT2 patients.CONCLUSIONSOur data suggest that sympathetic stimulation produces a greater increase in both transmural and spatial dispersion of repolarization in LQT1 than in LQT2 syndrome, and this may explain why LQT1 patients are more sensitive to sympathetic stimulation

Differential effects of beta-blockade on dispersion of repolarization in the absence and presence of sympathetic stimulation between the lqt1 and lqt2 forms of congenital long qt syndrome

AbstractObjectivesThis study compared the effects of beta-blockade on transmural and spatial dispersion of repolarization (TDR and SDR, respectively) between the LQT1 and LQT2 forms of congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS).BackgroundThe LQT1 form is more sensitive to sympathetic stimulation and more responsive to beta-blockers than either the LQT2 or LQT3 forms.MethodsEighty-seven-lead, body-surface electrocardiograms (ECGs) were recorded before and after epinephrine infusion (0.1 μg/kg body weight per min) in the absence and presence of oral propranolol (0.5–2.0 mg/kg per day) in 11 LQT1 patients and 11 LQT2 patients. The Q-Tendinterval, the Q-Tpeakinterval and the interval between Tpeakand Tend(Tp-e), representing TDR, were measured and averaged from 87-lead ECGs and corrected by Bazett’s method (corrected Q-Tendinterval [cQTe], corrected Q-Tpeakinterval [cQTp] and corrected interval between Tpeakand Tend[cTp-e]). The dispersion of cQTe(cQTe-D) was obtained among 87 leads and was defined as the interval between the maximum and minimum values of cQTe.ResultsPropranolol in the absence of epinephrine significantly prolonged the mean cQTpvalue but not the mean cQTevalue, thus decreasing the mean cTp-evalue in both LQT1 and LQT2 patients; the differences with propranolol were significantly larger in LQT1 than in LQT2 (p < 0.05). The maximum cQTe, minimum cQTeand cQTe-D were not changed with propranolol. Propranolol completely suppressed the influence of epinephrine in prolonging the mean cQTe, maximum cQTeand minimum cQTevalues, as well as increasing the mean cTp-eand cQTe-D values in both groups.ConclusionsBeta-blockade under normal sympathetic tone produces a greater decrease in TDR in the LQT1 form than in the LQT2 form, explaining the superior effectiveness of beta-blockers in LQT1 versus LQT2. Beta-blockers also suppress the influence of sympathetic stimulation in increasing TDR and SDR equally in LQT1 and LQT2 syndrome

Epinephrine unmasks latent mutation carriers with LQT1 form of congenital long-QT syndrome

n/