17 research outputs found

    Tangible Stock/Flow Experiments - Addressing Issues of Naturalistic Decision Making

    Get PDF
    Contains fulltext : 111858.pdf (author's version ) (Open Access)30th International System Dynamics Conferenc

    Strategisches und operatives Produktionsmanagement – Empirie und Simulation, Festschrift zum 65. Geburtstag von Peter Milling

    No full text
    Contains fulltext : 78514.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)350 p

    System Dynamics in der Planung von Softwareentwicklungsprojekten

    No full text
    Item does not contain fulltex

    Transparenz und Wahrheit – Subjektive und objektive Grenzen von Transparenz

    No full text

    System Dynamics and Sustainability

    No full text
    Contains fulltext : 111852.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access

    Do personal traits influence inventory management performance?—The case of intelligence, personality, interest and knowledge

    No full text
    Contains fulltext : 112103.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)14 p

    Performance in Tangible and in Cognitive Stock-Flow Tasks. Closer Than Expected

    No full text
    Contains fulltext : 150571.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)- Background - Most research in the area of dynamic decision making in general and stock-flow failures in particular is conducted with the help of computerized simulations as task environments or paper-based tasks of simple dynamic systems. - Purpose - The purpose of this article is to investigate if stock-flow failures persist in naturalistic decision making environments. - Methods - For this purpose, a tangible stock-flow experiment is used. It asks participants to meet a target level of water in a glass by pouring water through a funnel as fast as possible. We then compare their performance with a purely cognitive task (a manufacturing task). - Results - Participants on average did not significantly perform better in a tangible stock-flow task than in a paper-based test of a comparable task. In addition, individual performance in the tangible task cannot be related to performance in a similar paper-pencil stock-flow task. - Conclusions - An implication of this study is that tangible stock-flow tasks are as difficult for humans to control as are purely cognitive tasks. Further research should address individual differences between the two task modes (tangible vs. cognitive). A limitation of this study is the usage of only one tangible stock-flow task.5 mei 201

    Logistik-Dienstleister: Langfristige Personalplanung mit System Dynamics

    No full text
    Item does not contain fulltex
    corecore