Putting a Face on Algorithms: Personas for Modeling Artificial Intelligence

We propose a new type of personas, artificial intelligence (AI) personas, as a tool for designing systems consisting of both human and AI agents. Personas are commonly used in design practices for modelling users. We argue that the personification of AI agents can help multidisciplinary teams in understanding and designing systems that include AI agents. We propose a process for creating AI personas and the properties they should include, and report on our first experience using them. The case we selected for our exploration of AI personas was the design of a highly automated decision support tool for air traffic control. Our first results indicate that AI personas helped designers to empathise with algorithms and enabled better communication within a team of designers and AI and domain experts. We call for a research agenda on AI personas and discussions on potential benefits and pitfalls of this approach.acceptedVersio

Scheduling Vehicles with Spatial Conflicts

When scheduling the movement of individual vehicles on a traffic network, one must ensure that they never get too close to one another. This is normally modelled by segmenting the network and forbidding two vehicles to occupy the same segment at the same time. This approximation is often insufficient or too restraining. This study develops and systematises the use of conflict regions to model spatial proximity constraints. By extending the classical disjunctive programming approach to job-shop scheduling problems, we demonstrate how conflict regions can be exploited to efficiently schedule the collective movements of a set of vehicles, in this case aircraft moving on an airport ground network. We also show how conflict regions can be used in the short-term control of vehicle speeds to avoid collisions and deadlocks. The overall approach was implemented in a software system for air traffic management at airports and successfully evaluated for scheduling and guiding airplanes during an extensive human in the loop simulation exercise for the Budapest airport. Through simulations, we also provide numerical results to assess the computational efficiency of our scheduling algorithm.acceptedVersio

The importance of considering pushback time and arrivals when routing departures on the ground at airports

With the constant increase in air traffic, airports are facing capacity problems. Many airports are increasingly interested in utilising optimisation methods for specific airport processes. However, many such processes do happen in parallel, and maximising the potential benefits will require a complex optimisation model. A model which considers multiple processes simultaneously and the detailed complexities of the processes, rather than using more abstract models. This paper investigates how the arriving aircraft can affect the routing process and whether the pushback process can result into different types of delays. Furthermore, aircraft are routed backwards, starting from the destination in order to be at the runway on time and to respect the departure sequence. After testing our model with and without the arriving aircraft we found that arriving aircraft can indeed produce a lot of delays. Such delays would otherwise pass unnoticed as they result to departing aircraft choose different paths or pushback earlier so they be at the runway on time. Having an accurate model for the pushback process is important in order to understand in depth how the pushback process affects the other processes that happen in parallel. Furthermore, it led to more accurate and realistic model, which may assist the decision making process for ground movement operations and thereby help airports increase their capacity and become more environmentally friendly

The effects of pushback delays on airport ground movement

With the constant increase in air traffic, airports are facing capacity problems. Optimisation methods for specific airport processes are starting to be increasingly utilised by many large airports. However, many processes do happen in parallel, and maximising the potential benefits will require a more complex optimisation model, which can consider multiple processes simultaneously and take into account the detailed complexities of the processes where necessary, rather than using more abstract models. This paper focuses on one of these complexities, which is usually ignored in ground movement planning; showing the importance of the pushback process in the routing process. It investigates whether taking the pushback process into consideration can result in the prediction of delays that would otherwise pass unnoticed. Having an accurate model for the pushback process is important for this and identifying all of the delays that may occur can lead to more accurate and realistic models that can then be used in the decision making process for ground movement operations. After testing two different routing methods with a more detailed pushback process, we found that many of the delays are not predicted if the pushback process is not explicitly modelled. Having a more precise model, with accurate movements of aircraft is very important for any integrated model and will allow ground movement models to be of use in more reliable integrated decision making systems at airports. Minimising these delays can help airports increase their capacity and become more environmentally friendly

The importance of considering pushback time and arrivals when routing departures on the ground at airports

With the constant increase in air traffic, airports are facing capacity problems. Many airports are increasingly interested in utilising optimisation methods for specific airport processes. However, many such processes do happen in parallel, and maximising the potential benefits will require a complex optimisation model. A model which considers multiple processes simultaneously and the detailed complexities of the processes, rather than using more abstract models. This paper investigates how the arriving aircraft can affect the routing process and whether the pushback process can result into different types of delays. Furthermore, aircraft are routed backwards, starting from the destination in order to be at the runway on time and to respect the departure sequence. After testing our model with and without the arriving aircraft we found that arriving aircraft can indeed produce a lot of delays. Such delays would otherwise pass unnoticed as they result to departing aircraft choose different paths or pushback earlier so they be at the runway on time. Having an accurate model for the pushback process is important in order to understand in depth how the pushback process affects the other processes that happen in parallel. Furthermore, it led to more accurate and realistic model, which may assist the decision making process for ground movement operations and thereby help airports increase their capacity and become more environmentally friendly

The effects of pushback delays on airport ground movement

With the constant increase in air traffic, airports are facing capacity problems. Optimisation methods for specific airport processes are starting to be increasingly utilised by many large airports. However, many processes do happen in parallel, and maximising the potential benefits will require a more complex optimisation model, which can consider multiple processes simultaneously and take into account the detailed complexities of the processes where necessary, rather than using more abstract models. This paper focuses on one of these complexities, which is usually ignored in ground movement planning; showing the importance of the pushback process in the routing process. It investigates whether taking the pushback process into consideration can result in the prediction of delays that would otherwise pass unnoticed. Having an accurate model for the pushback process is important for this and identifying all of the delays that may occur can lead to more accurate and realistic models that can then be used in the decision making process for ground movement operations. After testing two different routing methods with a more detailed pushback process, we found that many of the delays are not predicted if the pushback process is not explicitly modelled. Having a more precise model, with accurate movements of aircraft is very important for any integrated model and will allow ground movement models to be of use in more reliable integrated decision making systems at airports. Minimising these delays can help airports increase their capacity and become more environmentally friendly

User Involvement in the Design of ML-Infused Systems

Advances in machine learning (ML) open up possibilities for better supporting the decision making that occurs in high-stakes domains such as air traffic management (ATM). The success of such decision-making systems highly depends upon end users’ involvement in their development process. However, most designers face challenges with finding appropriate ways of doing this. This paper presents our ongoing work to investigate design practices by reporting lessons learned from user involvement in the development of an ML-infused ATM decision support system. To explore if and how UX design methods need to be refined when working with ML as a design material, we conducted an online study with domain experts consisting of three iterations. The paper reports the main challenges we faced and our actions to overcome them. Our results can be useful to other designers working with ML-infused systems.acceptedVersio

SESAR Solution 08.01 Validation Plan (VALP) for V2 - Part I; D2.1.040

Dissemination level = CO confidentialThis validation plan describes the V2 validation activities planned for solution 1 of the PJ08 Advanced Airspace Management. The aim of the planned validation activities in Wave 1 is to complete V2 maturity level of the four Operational Improvements as foreseen in the Transition Validation Strategy [22]: • AOM-0208- B • AOM-0805 • AOM-0809A & AOM-0809-B • CM-0102- B Model based, fast time simulations and real time simulations are planned to address stakeholders’ needs and assess the KPAs. This document is part of a project that has received funding from the SESAR Joint Undertaking under grant agreement No 731796 under European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme.SESAR Solution 08.01 Validation Plan (VALP) for V2 - Part I; D2.1.040acceptedVersio

The effects of pushback delays on airport ground movement

With the constant increase in air traffic, airports are facing capacity problems. Optimisation methods for specific airport processes are starting to be increasingly utilised by many large airports. However, many processes do happen in parallel, and maximising the potential benefits will require a more complex optimisation model, which can consider multiple processes simultaneously and take into account the detailed complexities of the processes where necessary, rather than using more abstract models. This paper focuses on one of these complexities, which is usually ignored in ground movement planning; showing the importance of the pushback process in the routing process. It investigates whether taking the pushback process into consideration can result in the prediction of delays that would otherwise pass unnoticed. Having an accurate model for the pushback process is important for this and identifying all of the delays that may occur can lead to more accurate and realistic models that can then be used in the decision making process for ground movement operations. After testing two different routing methods with a more detailed pushback process, we found that many of the delays are not predicted if the pushback process is not explicitly modelled. Having a more precise model, with accurate movements of aircraft is very important for any integrated model and will allow ground movement models to be of use in more reliable integrated decision making systems at airports. Minimising these delays can help airports increase their capacity and become more environmentally friendly