73 research outputs found
Criticism and Rework of Homeric Narrative in Dio's Trojan Discourse
Dio Chrysostom, in his Trojan Discourse (Speech 11) rewrites the story of the Trojan War in a new and different way (with Trojans’ victory over Greeks, the murder of Hector by Achilles, and so on), in contrast with the tale of the Iliad and under the pretense of an historical reconstruction. He preys on Homeric narrative techniques (such as the selective and motivated plot of the Iliad, and the first-person tale in the Odyssey), in order to disprove the traditional version of the legend and to pave the way for a new view. Dio takes a metaliterary and intertextual approach to Homeric epics, insofar as he criticizes and deconstructs their narratives (bearing in mind Homeric criticism by Aristotle and by Alexandrine grammarians), in order to rebuild the story anew. He also provides a specimen of generic crossing, since he frames an epic subject in the context of a prose speech that belongs to epidictic oratory and that simulates some historiographical practices.Dio Chrysostom, in his Trojan Discourse (Speech 11) rewrites the story of the Trojan War in a new and different way (with Trojans’ victory over Greeks, the murder of Hector by Achilles, and so on), in contrast with the tale of the Iliad and under the pretense of an historical reconstruction. He preys on Homeric narrative techniques (such as the selective and motivated plot of the Iliad, and the first-person tale in the Odyssey), in order to disprove the traditional version of the legend and to pave the way for a new view. Dio takes a metaliterary and intertextual approach to Homeric epics, insofar as he criticizes and deconstructs their narratives (bearing in mind Homeric criticism by Aristotle and by Alexandrine grammarians), in order to rebuild the story anew. He also provides a specimen of generic crossing, since he frames an epic subject in the context of a prose speech that belongs to epidictic oratory and that simulates some historiographical practices
Compre-rendu de M. Davies, The Aethiopis, Washington 2016
Compre-rendu de M. Davies, The Aethiopis, Washington 201
Compre-rendu de R. Jenkyns, Classical Literature, New York 2016
Compre-rendu de R. Jenkyns, Classical Literature, New York 201
I due volti di Elena. Sopravvivenze della tradizione orale nell’Odissea
The Two Faces of Helen. Survival of Oral Tradition in the Odyssey.
The speeches of Helen and Menelaus to Telemachus at Odyssey, IV, outline two different versions about the behavior of Helen towards Achaeans and Trojans at the time of the conquest of Troy : both versions go back to the pre-homeric oral tradition, which was also attested in the poems of the epic cycle (as we learn from the summaries of Proclus). Therefore, the Homeric episode can be interpreted as a ‘ survey’ or a ‘ review’ of the preexisting variants of the legend.I discorsi rivolti da Elena e Menelao a Telemaco nel libro IV dell’Odissea delineano due differenti versioni sul comportamento di Elena nei confronti degli Achei e dei Troiani al tempo della conquista di Troia : entrambe le versioni risalgono alla tradizione orale preomerica, che era anche attestata nei poemi del ciclo epico (come si apprende dai riassunti di Proclo). L’episodio omerico può essere interpretato quindi come una ‘ rassegna’ o una ‘ revisione’ delle preesistenti varianti della leggenda.Scafoglio Giampiero. I due volti di Elena. Sopravvivenze della tradizione orale nell’Odissea. In: Gaia : revue interdisciplinaire sur la Grèce Archaïque, numéro 18, 2015. pp. 133-144
Men and Animals in Lucretius' De rerum natura
International audienceMen and Animals in Lucretius' De rerum natur
Compte-rendu de H.-C- Gunther (ed.), Virgilian Studies, Nordhausen 2015
Compte-rendu de H.-C- Gunther (ed.), Virgilian Studies, Nordhausen 201
Ingénuité et subtilité de Servius
International audienceIngénuité et subtilité de Serviu
Virgile, le maitre des orateurs (Macrobe, "Saturnales" V, 1)
International audienceVirgile, le maitre des orateurs (Macrobe, "Saturnales" V, 1
- …