Micellar solubilization of poorly water-soluble drugs: effect of surfactant and solubilizate molecular structure

<p><b>Objective:</b> This study aims to clarify the role of surfactant and drug molecular structures on drug solubility in micellar surfactant solutions.</p> <p><b>Significance:</b> (1) Rationale for surfactant selection is provided; (2) the large data set can be used for validation of the drug solubility parameters used in oral absorption models.</p> <p><b>Methods:</b> Equilibrium solubility of two hydrophobic drugs and one model hydrophobic steroid in micellar solutions of 19 surfactants was measured by HPLC. The drug solubilization locus in the micelles was assessed by UV spectrometry.</p> <p><b>Results:</b> Danazol is solubilized much more efficiently than fenofibrate by ionic surfactants due to ion–dipole interactions between the charged surfactant head groups and the polar steroid backbone. Drug solubilization increases linearly with the increase of hydrophobic chain length for all studied surfactant types. Addition of 1–3 ethylene oxide (EO) units in the head group of dodecyl sulfate surfactants reduces significantly the solubilization of both studied drugs and decreases linearly the solubilization locus polarity of fenofibrate. The locus of fenofibrate solubilization is in the hydrophobic core of nonionic surfactant micelles and in the palisade layer of ionic surfactant micelles.</p> <p><b>Conclusions:</b> Highest drug solubility can be obtained by using surfactants molecules with long chain length coupled with hydrophilic head group that provides additional drug–surfactant interactions (i.e. ion–dipole) in the micelles.</p

Efficient Control of the Rheological and Surface Properties of Surfactant Solutions Containing C8–C18 Fatty Acids as Cosurfactants

Systematic experimental study is performed about the effects of chain length (varied between C8 and C18) and concentration of fatty acids (FAc), used as cosurfactants to the mixture of the anionic surfactant SLES and the zwitterionic surfactant CAPB. The following properties are studied: bulk viscosity of the concentrated solutions (10 wt % surfactants), dynamic and equilibrium surface tensions, surface modulus, and foam rheological properties for the diluted foaming solutions (0.5 wt % surfactants). The obtained results show that C8–C10 FAc induce formation of wormlike micelles in the concentrated surfactant solutions, which leads to transformation of these solutions into viscoelastic fluids with very high apparent viscosity. The same FAc shorten the characteristic adsorption time of the diluted solutions by more than 10 times. In contrast, C14–C18 FAc have small effect on the viscosity of the concentrated solutions but increase the surface modulus above 350 mN/m, which leads to higher friction inside sheared foams and to much smaller bubbles in the formed foams. The intermediate chain C12 FAc combines some of the properties seen with C10 FAc and other properties seen with C14 FAc. These results clearly demonstrate how appropriate cosurfactants can be used for efficient control of the rheological properties of concentrated surfactant solutions and of some important foam attributes, such as bubble size and foam rheology

Effect of Cationic Polymers on Foam Rheological Properties

We study the effect of two cationic polymers, with trade names Jaguar C13s and Merquat 100, on the rheological properties of foams stabilized with a mixture of anionic and zwitterionic surfactants (sodium lauryloxyethylene sulfate and cocoamidopropyl betaine). A series of five cosurfactants are used to compare the effect of these polymers on foaming systems with high and low surface dilatational moduli. The experiments revealed that the addition of Jaguar to the foaming solutions leads to (1) a significant increase of the foam yield stress for all systems studied, (2) the presence of consecutive maximum and minimum in the stress vs shear rate rheological curve for foams stabilized by cosurfactants with a high surface modulus (these systems cannot be described by the Herschel–Bulkley model anymore), and (3) the presence of significant foam–wall yield stress for all foaming solutions. These effects are explained with the formation of polymer bridges between the neighboring bubbles in slowly sheared foams (for inside foam friction) and between the bubbles and the confining solid wall (for foam-wall friction). Upon addition of 150 mM NaCl, the effect of Jaguar disappears. The addition of Merquat does not noticeably affect any of the foam rheological properties studied. Optical observations of foam films, formed from all these systems, show a very good correlation between the polymer bridging of the foam film surfaces and the strong polymer effect on the foam rheological properties. The obtained results demonstrate that the bubble–bubble attraction can be used for efficient control of the foam yield stress and foam–wall yield stress, without significantly affecting the viscous friction in sheared foams