8 research outputs found

    Multicenter trial on Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). First case series of 18 surgeons (K)

    No full text

    Effect of Six-Month Postoperative Endothelial Cell Density on Graft Survival after Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty

    No full text
    Purpose: To analyze if 6-month endothelial cell density (ECD) affects long-term ECD outcome and graft survival 5 years after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in eyes with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD).Design: Retrospective cohort study.Participants: A total of 585 DMEK eyes were included. The study group was divided into 4 groups based on 6-month ECD quartiles: group 1 (n = 146) with 313 to 1245 cells/mm(2), group 2 (n = 148) with 1246 to 1610 cells/mm(2), group 3 (n = 145) with 1611 to 1938 cells/mm(2), and group 4 (n = 146) with 1939 to 2760 cells/mm(2). Group 1 was further split into subgroups 1a (n = 36) with 6-month ECD of <828 cells/mm(2), 1b (n = 37) with 829 to 1023 cells/mm(2), 1c (n = 37) with 1024 to 1140 cells/mm(2), and 1d (n = 36) 1141 to 1245 cells/mm(2).Methods: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.Main Outcome Measures: Long-term ECD, graft survival, and postoperative complication rates.Results: For group 1, 6-month ECD decreased from 951 (+/- 233) cells/mm(2) (n = 146) to 735 (+/- 216) cells/mm(2) (n = 99) at 5 years postoperatively. Group 1 graft survival probability was 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91-0.99] at 5 years postoperatively, which was lower than for groups 2 to 4 (P = 0.001). Five-year graft survival in subgroup 1a was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.67-0.94), which was lower than in subgroups 1b to 1d (P = 0.001). Preoperative ECD did not influence graft survival (P = 0.400), and higher 6-month ECD values were associated with lower graft failure rates (hazard ratio, 0.994; 95% CI, 0.99-1.00; P = 0.001).Conclusions: Six-month ECD is associated with DMEK graft survival. High early cell loss after DMEK negatively affects long-term ECD outcome and graft survival. Grafts in the lowest 6-month ECD subgroup (<828 cells/mm(2)) are at higher risk of failure within 5 years after DMEK. To ensure sufficiently high 6-month ECD, preoperative graft quality assessment should be optimized, and cellular stress induced to the graft should be minimized. Additionally, developing therapeutic options for the treatment of low postoperative ECD could further improve DMEK graft longevity. (C) 2021 by the American Academy of OphthalmologyOphthalmic researc

    Outcome of phacoemulsification after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) (B)

    No full text

    Use of Corneas From Septic Donors for Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty

    No full text
    Purpose: To evaluate the suitability of corneas from septic donors for transplantation by analyzing the discard rate in the eye bank and the clinical outcome of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) using organ-cultured corneal grafts from septic versus nonseptic donors. Methods: This retrospective study included 1554 corneas of which 456 corneas (29%) were from septic and 1072 corneas (69%) from nonseptic donors [for 26 corneas (2%) sepsis status was unknown]. The clinical outcome at 6 months after DMEK was evaluated for 82 grafts (26 from septic and 56 from nonseptic donors). Outcome measures were endothelial cell density, central corneal thickness, and postoperative complications. Results: Primary discard rates were higher for corneas from septic than from nonseptic donors (32.9% vs. 24.5%, P = 0.001). The main discard reason was poor endothelial cell quality for both septic (13.8%) and nonseptic (11.8%) donor corneas. Eye bank contamination rates for septic and nonseptic donor corneas were 1.1% and 1.7%, respectively (P = 0.102). After DMEK, donor endothelial cell density at 6m postoperatively was comparable between grafts from septic and nonseptic donors (1410 +/- 422 cells/mm(2) vs. 1590 +/- 519 cells/mm(2), P = 0.140). No differences in 6m central corneal thickness and in the rebubbling rate were observed between the 2 groups (P = 0.780 and P = 0.396, respectively). None of the cases had graft rejection nor endophthalmitis in both groups. Conclusions: Provided strict adherence to donor screening and evaluation protocols, the use of organ-cultured corneas from septic donors for DMEK does not seem to increase the risk for recipients and allows for expansion of the donor pool for corneal tissue.Ophthalmic researc
    corecore