47 research outputs found
Effect of feeding maize fiber in wet, dry and silage form with cotton cake supplementation on intake, nutrient utilization and performance in Nellore Brown sheep
Maize fiber was evaluated in wet, dry and silage form with 200
g cotton cake supplementation in growing Nellore Brown ram
lambs (24.8±0.96) using six sheep per treatment in a growth-cummetabolism
trial of 90 days with collection of feed, leftover, feces and
urine samples during the last ten days. Average daily gain (g), nutrient
digestibility (OM, CP, NDF, ADF) tended to be higher (P = 0.07 to 0.09)
and intake of OM, DOM, CP (gld) and ME (MJ!d) and nitrogen retention
were significantly (P = 0. 0002 to 0. 002) higher in lambs when fed
maize fiber in silage rather than in wet and dry form. Depending on
input such as labor required ensilaging or drying of maize fiber seems
an economically more beneficial and from a food security point of
view a safer way than feeding wet maize fiber
Evaluation of different cultivars of sorghum for fodder quality and agronomic performance in Semi-Arid Tropics
Thirty four improved sorghum cultivars were evaluated for fodder quality and agronomic performance using two
cuts harvested during the rainy season 2014 at ICRISAT, Patancheru following randomized complete block design
with two replications. Within cuts consistent significant cultivar difference were only observed for biomass yields
which ranged from 17.3 - 33.8 t ha-1 in the first cut to 3.2 and 17.4 t ha-1 in the second cut. Within and across cuts cultivar-dependent variations in fodder quality traits were statistically largely insignificant and inconsistent
Comparisons of ensiled maize, sorghum and pearl millet forages fed to sheep
Water-use efficient sorghum (7) and pearl millet (5) forages were
compared with reference maize forage as silage tested with Nellore
Brown sheep. Mean silage organic matter intake was 352, 297 and
137g!d in maize, sorghum and pearl millet silage, respectively Current
pearl millet forage cultivars do not match maize forage in terms of
fodder quality Of the 7 sorghum cultivars several were on par with
maize though the cultivar dependent variation in intake was huge
(254 to 343g!d). Anti-nutritive factors associated with sorghum like
dhurrin were undetectable in the silages, although present in the fresh
forage. A routine laboratory trait does not seem to describe sorghum
and pearl millet forages adequately More research is required to
understand the true nutritional potential of sorghum and in particular
pearl millet forages. Dissemination of these forages based on only
biomass yield should be discouraged