Blümmel, Michael

Boddepalli, V.N.

Devulapalli, R.

Giri, R.R.

Nair, R.M.

Prasad, K.V.S.V.

Reddy, Y.R.

Sharada, P.

Prasad, Kodukula V.S.V.

CGSpace

ISBN 978-81-908621-7-2 ECO-RESPONSIVE FEEDING AND NUTRITION LINKING LIVESTOCK AND LIVELIHOOD 1\aST~/\CT ?1\?C:~S AK Pattanaik, SE Jadhav N Dutta, AK Verma and R Bhuyan (Editors) ANA~ NLE32 Variation in Mungbean for Grain Yield, Haulm Yield and Forage Quality Ramakrishnan M. Nair*, Rajkumar R. Giri,Venkata Naresh Boddepalli, P. Sharada1, K.V.S.V. Prasad ' ,Y. Ram ana Reddy', Ravi Devulapalli 1 and Michael Blummel 1 AYRDC- The World Vegetable Center, South Asia, ICRISAT Campus, 502324,1ndia 'International Livestock Research Instit ute (ILRI), ICRISAT Campus-502324,1ndia *Correspondence: ramakrishnan.nair@worldveg.org SllMMARY: Mungbcan (Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek) is a legU111e crop that can be used i(Jr grain, forage as well as for green manure. Signillcant variation was observed lor forage quality traits such as nitrogen content, acid detergent fibre and metabolisable energy in 26 mungbean lines grov.n in Hyderabad, India during 2013. Mungbean lines such as VC 6510-151-1 and M1 818 with good grain yield and lorage quality were identified for further testing. Keywords: Dual purpose, Fodder legume, Food legume BACKGROUND Mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek) is a protein rich, short duration (about 60-65 days) grain legume that fits in well into the major cereal cropping systems of South and Southeast Asia (Nair et al. 2013). Mungbean is also utilised as a forage cum grain crop in countries like Egypt (Abd El-Salam et al. 20 13). The use of crop residues of mung bean after grain harvest is also prevalent in some countries. Here we explore the variation for grain yield and forage quality traits in mungbean lines grown in Hyderabad, India. ME1HOOOLOGY Twenty six mungbean lines were sown in a randomised block design with three replicates in Hyderabad, India during June 2013 (Kharif season). Data on pod yield/plant (PY), grain yield/plant (GY) and halum yield/plant (HY) were recorded at crop maturity stage. In addition, nitrogen content (N), neutral detergent fibre (NDF), acid detergent fibre (ADF), acid detergent lignin (ADL), metabolisable energy (ME) and in vitro organic matter digestibility (IVOMD) were determined by Near-Infrared Reflectance method. Four li nes (3 best (VC 6510-151-1, ML 818 and ML 1628) and I poor (NM 94)based on performance during 2013) were grown during June 2014 (Kharif season) in the same location adopting similar experimental design as in 2013 . A combined analysis of the data from 2013 and 2014 was conducted for the above mentioned traits. Broad sense heritability estimates were worked for the traits. RESULTS Significant (P<0.05) variation was found for nitrogen content, acid detergent fibre and metabolisable energy among the 26 mungbean lines during (Table I). With regard to seed yield, KPS-2, VC 6510-151-1 and Harsha were the top performers. VC 6469-12-3-4A, VC 6510-151-1 and VC 6512-6A recorded the highest values for forage yield. Tn terms of nitrogen content, ML 818, YC 3890A and ML 613 showed the best performance. YC 6510-151-1, ML 818 and PAU 911 recorded the highest va lues for TVOMD. Grain yield showed significant (P=0.05) positive association with haulm yield and IVOMD. During 2014, line x year interaction was significant for NDF, ADF, ADL, ME and IVOMD. Haulm yield showed high heritability (0.9) and moderate heritability was recorded for nitrogen content (0.6). Table 1. Variation among mungbean lines grown in Hyderabad, India during 2013 for grain yield, haulm yield and forage quality Line N NDF ADF ADL Barimung 4 2.7 35.3 27.7 6.1 HARSHA 2.8 32.9 25.4 5.7 KPS 1 2.6 38.6 29.5 7.0 KPS 2 2.4 38.3 29.3 6.5 ML 1628 2.7 32.6 25.7 5.7 ML 1666 2.8 30.4 23.8 5.0 ML 1299 2.6 33.1 26.0 5.7 NM 92 2.6 39.1 29.9 7.2 NM 94 2 .5 45.0 32.5 8.4 PAU 911 2.5 35.4 27.7 5.9 VC 3890A 2.9 33.9 24.8 5.9 VC 6173B-13P 2.6 35.7 26.7 6.2 vc 6372(45-8-1) 2.3 40 .9 30 .3 6.9 YC 6469-12-3-4A 2.6 34.8 27.8 6 .3 vc 6486-10-51 2.3 39.3 32.5 7.4 vc 6489-9-1 2.6 35.5 26.7 5.9 vc 6493-44-1 2.5 35.5 27.5 6.0 vc 6510-151-1 2.6 33.5 24 .7 5.9 vc 6512-6A 2.6 34.9 25.6 5.7 VO 13528-G 2 .3 39.6 29.2 6.7 YO 6381A-G 2.6 33.4 26.9 5.5 p 0.04 0.06 0.06 0.05 CONCLUSION The study showed the potential for selection of mungbean lines for haulm yield and nitrogen content. 32 ME IVOMD HY kg/ha PY kg/ha GY kg/ha 8.2 60.1 845.6 1238.7 722.6 8.3 61.0 848.9 1676.8 1076.1 8.0 58.7 623.3 1159.6 730.9 8 .5 60.8 I 093.3 2028.0 1198.6 8.4 61.4 1098 .9 1702.2 I 071.2 8.2 60.6 1008.9 1755.3 I 052.5 8.2 60.1 626.7 I I 03.1 674.5 7.9 58.0 992.2 1788.0 I 054 .7 7.8 57.4 291.1 1148.7 700.5 8.7 62.1 553.3 123 8.4 801.5 8.3 61.0 610.0 985.9 541.2 8.1 59.3 835.6 123 1.5 630.3 8.1 58.1 525.6 1235.9 715.3 8.2 60.4 1191.1 1641.7 I 013.0 8.2 59.8 823.3 1409.4 825.1 8.3 60.1 975.6 1274.6 894 .9 8.3 60 .3 868 .9 1210 .2 687.4 8.9 63.8 1 137.8 1781.2 1140.0 8.4 61.1 1123.3 1405.6 935.3 8.3 59 .7 947.8 1583.0 I 059.3 8.5 61.6 I 097.8 1321.3 867.4 0.03 0.01 0.25 0.70 0.41 REFERENCES Abd EI -Sa1am, M.S., EI-Metwa11y, I.M. , Abd EI-Ghany, H.M. and Hozayn, M. 2013. J. Appl. Sci. Res. , 9: 1238-1243. Nair, R.M., Yang, R.Y., Easdown, W.J., Thavarajah, D., Thavarajah, P. , Hughes, Jd'A. and Keatinge, J.D.H. 2013. J. Sci. Food Agric ., 93: 1805-1818. Eco-responsive Feeding and Nutrit ion: Link ing Livestock and Livelihood 

Variation in mungbean for grain yield, haulm yield and forage quality

https://cgspace.cgiar.org/bitstream/10568/67268/1/N32.pdf

Variation in mungbean for grain yield, haulm yield and forage quality

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

CGSpace