Comparison of transcutaneous electrical tibial nerve stimulation for the treatment of overactive bladder: a multi-arm randomized controlled trial with blinded assessment

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of tibial nerve transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for an overactive bladder, considering the sites of application and frequency of attendance. METHODS: This multi-arm randomized controlled trial enrolled 137 adult women (61.0±9.0 years) with overactive bladder from a university hospital. They underwent 12 sessions of 30-min TENS application and were assigned to five groups: one leg, once a week (n=26); one leg, twice a week (n=27); two legs, once a week (n=26); two legs, twice a week (n=28); and placebo (n=30). Symptoms of overactive bladder and its impact on quality of life were evaluated before and after 6 or 12 weeks of treatment using the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-V8 and voiding diary. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01912885. RESULTS: The use of one leg, once a week TENS application reduced the frequency of urgency episodes compared with the placebo (1.0±1.6 vs. 1.4±1.9; p=0.046) and frequency of incontinence episodes compared with the placebo (0.7±1.4 vs.1.4±2.2; p<0.0001). The one-leg, twice a week protocol decreased the urinary frequency compared with the two legs, once a week protocol (8.2±3.5 vs. 9.0±5.1; p=0.026) and placebo (8.2±3.5 vs. 7.9±2.7; p=0.02). Nocturia improved using the two legs, once a week protocol (1.5±1.8) when compared with the one leg, twice a week protocol (1.9±2.0) and placebo (1.7±1.6) (p=0.005 and p=0.027, respectively). Nocturia also improved using the two legs, twice a week protocol when compared with the one leg, twice a week protocol (1.3±1.2 vs.1.9±2.0; p=0.011). CONCLUSION: One-leg stimulation improved the daily urinary frequency, urgency, and incontinence, and the two-leg stimulation once and twice weekly improved nocturia

Comparison of protocols tibial nerve electrostimulation for treatment of overactive bladder: a randomized blinded clinical trial

INTRODUÇÃO: No tratamento da síndrome bexiga hiperativa (SBH) a eletroestimulação do nervo tibial é uma terapêutica conservadora, eficaz, de baixo custo, de boa aderência pelas pacientes e com resultados satisfatórios. Não há consenso na literatura quanto à periodicidade e ao número de pontos para aplicação da técnica. OBJETIVO: Comparar a eficácia de protocolos de eletroestimulação do nervo tibial para tratamento fisioterapêutico da SBH não neurogênica. MÉTODOS: ensaio clínico randomizado cego com 138 mulheres portadoras da SBH há seis meses ou mais, randomizadas em cinco grupos: eletrodos posicionados em uma perna com sessões de uma ou duas vezes por semana, eletrodos posicionados em duas pernas com sessões de uma ou duas vezes por semana e um grupo controle. Foram utilizados os instrumentos: King\'s Health Questionnaire (KHQ), International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnarie - Short Form, Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-V8), Diário Miccional e uma Ficha de Avaliação Contínua. RESULTADOS: A média de idade foi de 61(±9), sendo que 91% estavam na menopausa. Na frequência urinária o protocolo de duas sessões foi melhor do que o de uma vez por semana (p=0,026). Para o sintoma de urgência e incontinência uma vez por semana teve melhor resultado (p=0,046 e p=0,0001, respectivamente). No sintoma de noctúria a aplicação nas duas pernas foi mais eficaz (p=0,005). Em relação a qualidade de vida, apenas o domínio \'limitações físicas\' do KHQ apresentou diferença significativa (p=0,0411). Conclusão: É importante identificar o sintoma mais frequente da SBH para individualizar a conduta fisioterapêutica. A forma de aplicação dos eletrodos e a frequência do tratamento devem ser modificadas de acordo com as necessidades de cada pacienteBACKGROUND: In the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB) electrical stimulation of the tibial nerve is a conservative therapeutically effective, low cost, good adherence of the patients with satisfactory results. There is no consensus in the literature regarding the periodicity and the number of points for the technical implementation. PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of electrical stimulation of the tibial nerve protocols to physical therapy for neurogenic OAB not. METHODS: blind randomized clinical trial in 138 women suffering from OAB six months or more randomized into five groups: electrodes positioned on one leg sessions with one or two times per week, electrodes positioned on both legs sessions once or twice per week and a control group. The instruments used were: King\'s Health Questionnaire (KHQ), International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form, Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-V8), Voiding Diary and a Continuous Assessment Form. RESULTS: The mean age was 61 ( ± 9), and 91% were in the menopause. In the urination two protocol sessions was better than the once a week (p = 0.026). For the symptom of urgency and incontinence once a week had better result (p = 0.046 and p = 0.0001, respectively). In the application nocturia symptom in both legs was more effective (p = 0.005). In relation to quality of life, only the domain \'physical limitations\' KHQ showed a significant difference (p = 0.0411). Conclusion: It is important to identify the most common symptom of OAB to individualize the practice of physical therapy. The form of application of the electrodes and the frequency of treatment should be modified according to the needs of each patien