Efficacy and safety of leflunomide in DMARD-naive patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of a loading and a fixed-dose regimen.

To assess the efficacy of LEF administered with or without a loading dose in DMARD-naïve patients with early RA. This multicentre, double-blind, randomized clinical trial included adults with RA diagnosed within 6 months (ACR criteria). Patients were randomly selected to receive either a 100 mg loading dose or a 20 mg fixed dose of LEF for 3 days, followed by a 3-month open-label maintenance period of 20 mg LEF qd. The primary outcome criterion was ACR20 response rate at study end in the intent-to-treat population. Secondary criteria were ACR20, ACR50, ACR70 and DAS28 response rates at 1 and 3 months and safety. The intent-to-treat population included 120 patients (median time since diagnosis 0.95 months). The ACR20 response rate at study end was 69.0% (95%CI 60.5%, 77.4%). Response rates were significantly lower (P = 0.025) in the loading-dose group [58.5% (45.2%, 71.8%)] than in the fixed-dose group [77.8% (67.5%, 88.0%)]. Three-month ACR50, ACR70 and DAS28 response rates were 41.4%, 17.7% and 81.7%, respectively, with no significant differences between groups. Adverse events occurred in 53.7% (loading-dose group) and 49.3% (fixed-dose group) of patients, most frequently diarrhoea and elevated hepatic enzymes; these occurred more frequently and earlier in treatment when the loading dose was used. LEF was effective in DMARD-naïve patients with early disease. No incremental benefit was observed with the use of a loading dose, which may be associated with an increased initial rate of adverse events. The advantage of LEF initiation with a loading dose is not confirmed in this population. ClinicalTrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov/, NCT00596206

A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE). CAPRIE Steering Committee

Many clinical trials have evaluated the benefit of long-term use of antiplatelet drugs in reducing the risk of clinical thrombotic events. Aspirin and ticlopidine have been shown to be effective, but both have potentially serious adverse effects. Clopidogrel, a new thienopyridine derivative similar to ticlopidine, is an inhibitor of platelet aggregation induced by adenosine diphosphate. METHODS: CAPRIE was a randomised, blinded, international trial designed to assess the relative efficacy of clopidogrel (75 mg once daily) and aspirin (325 mg once daily) in reducing the risk of a composite outcome cluster of ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction, or vascular death; their relative safety was also assessed. The population studied comprised subgroups of patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease manifested as either recent ischaemic stroke, recent myocardial infarction, or symptomatic peripheral arterial disease. Patients were followed for 1 to 3 years. FINDINGS: 19,185 patients, with more than 6300 in each of the clinical subgroups, were recruited over 3 years, with a mean follow-up of 1.91 years. There were 1960 first events included in the outcome cluster on which an intention-to-treat analysis showed that patients treated with clopidogrel had an annual 5.32% risk of ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction, or vascular death compared with 5.83% with aspirin. These rates reflect a statistically significant (p = 0.043) relative-risk reduction of 8.7% in favour of clopidogrel (95% Cl 0.3-16.5). Corresponding on-treatment analysis yielded a relative-risk reduction of 9.4%. There were no major differences in terms of safety. Reported adverse experiences in the clopidogrel and aspirin groups judged to be severe included rash (0.26% vs 0.10%), diarrhoea (0.23% vs 0.11%), upper gastrointestinal discomfort (0.97% vs 1.22%), intracranial haemorrhage (0.33% vs 0.47%), and gastrointestinal haemorrhage (0.52% vs 0.72%), respectively. There were ten (0.10%) patients in the clopidogrel group with significant reductions in neutrophils (< 1.2 x 10(9)/L) and 16 (0.17%) in the aspirin group. INTERPRETATION: Long-term administration of clopidogrel to patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease is more effective than aspirin in reducing the combined risk of ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction, or vascular death. The overall safety profile of clopidogrel is at least as good as that of medium-dose aspirin