A Prospective Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Edoxaban for the Resolution of Left Atrial Thrombosis in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Available evidence on left atrial (LA) thrombus dissolution in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) largely refers to the use of vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (VKAs), showing >50% thrombus resolution over a 4-week to 12-month treatment period. Available data on non-vitamin K antagonist anticoagulants (NOACs) in this setting are limited and derive from isolated case reports or observational small-sized investigations with dabigatran, rivaroxaban or apixaban. The aim of this study was to investigate the extent of thrombus resolution with edoxaban therapy in patients with AF and LA thrombosis. We conducted a prospective, observational, open-label pilot study in seven Italian institutions. We included a total of 25 patients with non-valvular AF and LA (or left atrial appendage (LAA)) thrombosis, documented by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). All patients received edoxaban OD treatment (n = 23 on 60 mg daily; n = 2 on 30 mg daily) and underwent TEE examination after 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with complete thrombus resolution by TEE imaging at 4 weeks. The mean age of the study population was 68.3 ± 10.8 years with a female population of 16%. AF was permanent in all cases, with a mean arrhythmia duration of 4.3 ± 1.7 years. CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores were 3.2 ± 1.5 and 1.9 ± 1.1, respectively. We were able to demonstrate a complete thrombus resolution in 14 patients (56%) at 4 weeks. In patients with residual atrial thrombosis (n = 11), we observed a 15.4 ± 14.9% reduction in the thrombus area from baseline. As compared with patients without thrombus dissolution, those with thrombus resolution had a numerically lower-indexed LA diameter (27.9 ± 9.3 vs 34.8 ± 16.1 mm/m2), a smaller maximum thrombus area at baseline (45.5 ± 44.6 vs 63.9 ± 43.5 mm2), a higher left ventricular ejection fraction (47.4 ± 21.0% vs 38.4 ± 20.6%) and higher maximum LAA flow velocities (26.3 ± 15.2 vs 19.3 ± 10.0 cm/s). Figures on the percentage of thrombus resolution in this study are comparable to those reported in the literature for the other OACs. We conclude that, in patients with AF, the use of edoxaban is associated with a >50% resolution of atrial thrombus at 4 weeks, similar to studies using VKAs and the other NOACs (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier number: NCT034899395)

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation and atrial thrombosis: An appraisal of current evidence

Major thromboembolic complications in patients with atrial fibrillation, secondary to thromboembolism from the left atrium or the left atrial appendage, are a major concern because of their burden of disabling stroke and mortality. To date, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are considered the first-line strategy in most patients with atrial fibrillation receiving chronic anticoagulation, as they have major advantages compared with vitamin K antagonists, including minimization of intracranial bleeding risk. Although several studies and post-hoc analyses have provided initial data on the use of NOACs in patients with documented atrial and/or left atrial appendage thrombosis, the benefit of NOACs in these patients has not been fully elucidated. In this review, we reappraise current evidence supporting the use of NOACs in patients with established atrial and/or left atrial appendage thrombosis, discussing potential mechanisms favouring the use of a NOAC-based strategy in this special setting

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation and atrial thrombosis: An appraisal of current evidence

Major thromboembolic complications in patients with atrial fibrillation, secondary to thromboembolism from the left atrium or the left atrial appendage, are a major concern because of their burden of disabling stroke and mortality. To date, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are considered the first-line strategy in most patients with atrial fibrillation receiving chronic anticoagulation, as they have major advantages compared with vitamin K antagonists, including minimization of intracranial bleeding risk. Although several studies and post-hoc analyses have provided initial data on the use of NOACs in patients with documented atrial and/or left atrial appendage thrombosis, the benefit of NOACs in these patients has not been fully elucidated. In this review, we reappraise current evidence supporting the use of NOACs in patients with established atrial and/or left atrial appendage thrombosis, discussing potential mechanisms favouring the use of a NOAC-based strategy in this special setting

Prevention of atherothrombotic events in patients with diabetes mellitus: from antithrombotic therapies to new-generation glucose-lowering drugs

Diabetes mellitus is an important risk factor for a first cardiovascular event and for worse outcomes after a cardiovascular event has occurred. This situation might be caused, at least in part, by the prothrombotic status observed in patients with diabetes. Therefore, contemporary antithrombotic strategies, including more potent agents or drug combinations, might provide greater clinical benefit in patients with diabetes than in those without diabetes. In this Consensus Statement, our Working Group explores the mechanisms of platelet and coagulation activity, the current debate on antiplatelet therapy in primary cardiovascular disease prevention, and the benefit of various antithrombotic approaches in secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes. While acknowledging that current data are often derived from underpowered, observational studies or subgroup analyses of larger trials, we propose antithrombotic strategies for patients with diabetes in various cardiovascular settings (primary prevention, stable coronary artery disease, acute coronary syndromes, ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack, peripheral artery disease, atrial fibrillation, and venous thromboembolism). Finally, we summarize the improvements in cardiovascular outcomes observed with the latest glucose-lowering drugs, and on the basis of the available evidence, we expand and integrate current guideline recommendations on antithrombotic strategies in patients with diabetes for both primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease

Platelet function and long-term antiplatelet therapy in women: is there a gender-specificity? A 'state-of-the-art' paper

Although the female gender is generally less represented in cardiovascular studies, observational and randomized investigations suggest that-compared with men-women may obtain different benefits from antiplatelet therapy. Multiple factors, including hormonal mechanisms and differences in platelet biology, might contribute to such apparent gender peculiarities. The thrombotic and bleeding risks, as well as outcomes after a cardiovascular event, appear to differ between genders, partly in relation to differences in age, comorbidities and body size. Equally, the benefits of antiplatelet therapy may differ in women compared with men in different vascular beds, during primary or secondary prevention and according to the type of an antiplatelet agent used. This document is an attempt to bring together current evidence, clinical practices and gaps of knowledge on gender-specific platelet function and antiplatelet therapy. On the basis of the available data, we provide suggestions on current indications of antiplatelet therapy for cardiovascular prevention in women with different clinical features; no strong recommendation may be given because the available data derive from observational studies or post hoc/subgroup analyses of randomized studies without systematic adjustments for baseline risk profiles. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved

Platelet function and long-term antiplatelet therapy in women: is there a gender-specificity? A 'state-of-the-art' paper

Although the female gender is generally less represented in cardiovascular studies, observational and randomized investigations suggest that\u2014 compared with men\u2014women may obtain different benefits from antiplatelet therapy. Multiple factors, including hormonal mechanisms and differences in platelet biology, might contribute to such apparent gender peculiarities. The thrombotic and bleeding risks, aswell as outcomes after a cardiovascular event, appear to differ between genders, partly in relation to differences in age, comorbidities and body size. Equally, the benefits of antiplatelet therapy may differ in women compared with men in different vascular beds, during primary or secondary prevention and according to the type of an antiplatelet agent used. This document is an attempt to bring together current evidence, clinical practices and gaps of knowledge on gender-specific platelet function and antiplatelet therapy.Onthe basis of the available data,we provide suggestions on current indications of antiplatelet therapy for cardiovascular prevention in women with different clinical features; no strong recommendation may be given because the available data derive fromobservational studies or post hoc/subgroup analyses of randomized studies without systematic adjustments for baseline risk profiles