108 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
The divided kingdom: making sense of the 'Brexit' referendum
The âin-or-outâ referendum on Britainâs EU membership on 23 June 2016 has returned a narrow majority for âBrexitâ. This result brings to the fore deep divisions within British society and has aggravated the current crisis of European integration. It has also plunged Britain into a period of political, economic and constitutional uncertainty. This article sheds light on the political context and the main drivers of the British vote to leave the EU. The discussion will begin with exploring the political rationale behind calling the referendum in the first place. The focus will then shift to the European negotiations about Britainâs demands for EU reform in the run-up to the vote. Finally, the article will analyse the main long- and short-term explanatory factors for the referendum outcome
Die britische RatsprÀsidentschaft 2005: Zwischen europÀischen Erwartungen und innenpolitischen Restriktionen
No description supplie
The media salience of Germany's bilateral relations to the United States, France and Britain
This article provides a comparative analysis of the salience of Germanyâs bilateral relations to the United States, France and Britain in the German media since the end of the cold war. It offers a media content frequency analysis which identifies long-term similarities and differences in media reporting across the three relationships as well as short-term upswings of media interest in each of them individually. This is relevant because the media salience of bilateral relations is a measure of their underpinnings in public discourse and speaks to the significance of domestic drivers in conducting such relationships. The article finds that media reporting on Germanyâs three bilateral relations under study has significantly increased in the post-9/11 period and that USâGerman and FrancoâGerman relations attract far more attention in the German media than AngloâGerman relations. Short-term upswings in media coverage are triggered by specific types of events, in particular crises in European integration and international military missions
Recommended from our members
"Once upon a time âŠ" fiascos as narratives in foreign policy
Despite the agreement among many scholars that fiascos in foreign policy are not objectively observable facts but that they lie in the eye of the beholder or in other words are discursively constructed, there is very little use of discourse analytical methods when investigating such âfiascosâ. This contribution therefore illustrates a method of narrative analysis and demonstrations how foreign policy fiascos are discursively constructed in the media. Based on insights from Literary Studies and Narratology it shows that stories about Mistakes consist of three fundamental elements: the setting of the story which guides appropriate behavior, the characterization of the actors involved as well as the emplotment of the event as a âfiascoâ and the attribution of cause and blame
Who gets what in foreign affairs? Explaining the allocation of foreign ministries in coalition governments
In coalition governments, political parties are concerned not only with how many but also with which departments they control. The foreign ministry is among the most highly considered prizes in coalition negotiations. This article develops hypotheses to explain under which conditions the foreign ministry is likely to be allocated to a âjunior coalition partnerâ. The factors that are hypothesized to affect the allocation are: the relative size of coalition parties; the proximity of their foreign policy positions; the party family of the junior coalition party; the salience of foreign policy to the coalition parties; and past allocations of the foreign ministry to junior coalition partners. Employing a crisp-set qualitative comparative analysis, the article demonstrates that although the conjunction of the junior partner being relatively large and it having led the foreign ministry in the past is not sufficient by itself, those two factors are very influential in the junior partner being allocated the foreign ministry
Narrating success and failure: congressional debates on the âIran nuclear dealâ
This article applies a method of narrative analysis to investigate the discursive contestation over the âIran nuclear dealâ in the United States. Specifically, it explores the struggle in the US Congress between narratives constituting the deal as a US foreign policy success or failure. The article argues that foreign policy successes and failures are socially constructed through narratives and suggests how narrative analysis as a discourse analytical method can be employed to trace discursive contests about such constructions. Based on insights from literary studies and narratology, it shows that stories of failures and successes follow similar structures and include a number of key elements, including a particular setting; a negative/positive characterization of individual and collective decision-makers; and an emplotment of success or failure through the attribution of credit/blame and responsibility. The article foregrounds the importance of how stories are told as an explanation for the dominance or marginality of narratives in political discourse
New Labour und der EURO: die Imperative des innerstaatlichen politischen Wettbewerbs
"Die Frage eines Beitritts GroĂbritanniens zur dritten Stufe der Wirtschafts- und WĂ€hrungsunion steht im Zentrum der aktuellen europapolitischen Debatte sowohl in der britischen Ăffentlichkeit als auch innerhalb der britischen Regierung. Obwohl die Labour-Regierung unter Tony Blair einen solchen Schritt prinzipiell befĂŒrwortet, hat sie es bisher unterlassen, die EinfĂŒhrung des EURO mit nachdrĂŒcklicher politischer FĂŒhrung zu betreiben und das erforderliche Referendum zu initiieren. Zur ErklĂ€rung dieser Politik New Labours schlĂ€gt der Autor eine Konzeption der innerstaatlichen 'constraints' der europapolitischen PrĂ€ferenzbildung vor, die auf den GrundprĂ€missen des 'Zwei-Ebenen-Ansatzes' beruht und neo-institutionalistischen Argumentationslinien folgt. Der Autor kommt zu dem Schluss, dass die PrĂ€ferenzbildung New Labours entgegen den Annahmen des Liberalen Intergouvernementalismus nicht schlĂŒssig als Funktion organisationsmĂ€chtiger Wirtschaftsinteressen gefasst werden kann. Auch eine ErklĂ€rung, die ausschlieĂlich auf die empirische AusprĂ€gung der öffentlichen Meinung abhebt, greift nach dieser Analyse zu kurz. Erst eine BerĂŒcksichtigung der veröffentlichten Meinung, des zwischenparteilichen Wettbewerbes und der PrĂ€ferenzverteilung innerhalb der Exekutive erlaubt eine umfassende ErklĂ€rung dafĂŒr, dass New Labour es bisher nicht vermocht hat, die in ihrer Meinungsbildung nicht vollstĂ€ndig verfestigte öffentliche Meinung von den Vorteilen einer EinfĂŒhrung des EURO zu ĂŒberzeugen." (Autorenreferat
British foreign policy after Brexit:Losing Europe and finding a role
British foreign policy stands at a turning point following the 2016 âBrexitâ referendum. Drawing on role theory, we trace the UKâs efforts to establish new foreign policy roles as it interacts with concerned international actors. We find that the pro-Brexit desire to âtake back controlâ has not yet translated into a cogent foreign policy direction. In its efforts to avoid adopting the role of isolate, the UK has projected a disoriented foreign policy containing elements of partially incompatible roles such as great power, global trading state, leader of the Commonwealth, regional partner to the EU, and faithful ally to the US. The international community has, through processes of socialization and alter-casting, largely rejected these efforts. These role conflicts between the UK and international actors, as well as conflicts among its different role aspirations, has pressed UK policies towards its unwanted isolationist role, potentially shaping its long-term foreign policy orientation post-Brexit.PostprintPeer reviewe
Blair's U-turn - Das britische Referendum ĂŒber eine europĂ€ische Verfassung
"Die Festlegung auf ein Referendum ĂŒber die europĂ€ische Verfassung in GroĂbritannien markiert den wohl abruptesten und signifikantesten europapolitischen Kurswechsel in der bisherigen Regierungszeit New Labours. Die Implikationen dieses Schrittes sowohl fĂŒr die Erfolgsaussichten der europĂ€ischen Verfassungsgebung als auch fĂŒr die politische Zukunft der Regierung Blair sind gravierend. Das vorliegende Arbeitspapier analysiert aus der Perspektive der Zwei-Ebenen-Metapher die BeweggrĂŒnde New Labours fĂŒr diesen Politikwechsel. Dabei kommt der Autor zu dem Schluss, dass die AnkĂŒndigung eines Referendums durch die erneute Dynamisierung des europĂ€ischen Verhandlungsprozesses angestoĂen wurde und gleichzeitig eine StĂ€rkung britischer Verhandlungsmacht in diesem Prozess bewirkt. Zudem ist der Politikwechsel auf der Ebene der innenpolitischen Auseinandersetzung zumindest kurz- und mittelfristig als Erfolg versprechendes taktisches Manöver der Regierung Blair zu interpretieren. Angeleitet durch die historische Analogie zum Referendum von 1975 ĂŒber die Mitgliedschaft GroĂbritanniens in der EG identifiziert der abschlieĂende Ausblick ungĂŒnstige Voraussetzungen fĂŒr das Bestreben New Labours, ein positives Ergebnis der Abstimmung ĂŒber die europĂ€ische Verfassung herbeizufĂŒhren." (Autorenreferat
- âŠ