Sistem Pendeteksian Penyusupan Jaringan Komputer dengan Active Response Menggunakan Metode Hybrid Intrusion Detection, Signatures dan Anomaly Detection

The progress of internet technology increase the need of security data. The progress of tools which have intrusion ability, also influence these needed. The methods of Intrusion Detection System (IDS) implementation and methods of analyze intrusion have excess and lack, which mutually completes. There are a lot of IDS now, but just an IDS open source based is snort. Method of snort implementation is network based restricted. This Final Task\u27s system used Hybrid Intrusion Detection System, Signatures and Anomaly Detection Methods. The indicator which used to detect intrusion are IP Address and Port Number. This system use TCP, UDP and ICMP protocols. This system also, is completed by active response, like blocking access for intruder. This System Implementation with Java Programming Language for engine perform and Java Server Pages (JSP) to develop user interface, The database which used is MYSQL. There are two of development test; Link system test and intrusion test. The link system test show the connect each interface. Intrusion is executed by host detection which used DoS HTTP tools and network detection which used Ping of Death\u27s scripts. The intrusion testing conclusions are; can be detected, analyze and active response for intrusion

Diagnostic performance at different cut-offs of the clinical prediction scores to identify virological failure using an independent dataset.

<p>CPS: clinical prediction score; PPV: positive predictive value; % VL done: percentage of patients that would undergo targeted VL testing; LHR: likelihood ratio.</p

Datasets used for the development and validation of the simplified prediction score to identify virological failure.

a<p>Inclusion criteria: consecutive enrolment of adult patients (≥18 years old) in follow-up at the Sihanouk Hospital Center of Hope on first-line ART for at least 12 months; viral load was systematically performed for study purpose; virological failure was defined as a single measurement >1000 copies/ml;</p>b<p>more than one episodes per individual.</p><p>ART: antiretroviral treatment; AZT: zidovudine; D4T: stavudine; 3TC: lamivudine; NVP: nevirapine; EFV: efavirenz; IQR: interquartile range.</p

Content and diagnostic performance of the simplified clinical prediction scores to identify virological failure^a.

<p>ART: antiretroviral treatment; AUROC: area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve; CPS: clinical prediction score; PPE: papular pruritic eruption; VAS: visual analogue scale.</p>a<p>differences between CPSs in the score of some predictors relate to the fact that the weight of each remaining predictor was recalculated after removing of specific predictors (<i>eg</i> after removing hemoglobin in CPS2 vs CPS1).</p>b<p>over a period of six months prior to viral load measurement.</p>c<p>over a period of one month prior to viral load measurement.</p

<i>“Current retention”</i> in care stratified by <i>“ART-age group”</i> in nine health facilities in Ethiopia, in 2009/2010.

<p><i>“Current retention”</i> in care stratified by <i>“ART-age group”</i> in nine health facilities in Ethiopia, in 2009/2010.</p

<i>“Current retention”</i> for a specific <i>“ART-age group”</i> during a specific <i>“calendar”</i> year ‘Y.’

<p>NA: Not applicable.</p

<i>“Current retention”</i> and “<i>cohort retention”</i> in care in nine health facilities in Ethiopia, mid-2010.

<p><i>“Current retention”</i> and “<i>cohort retention”</i> in care in nine health facilities in Ethiopia, mid-2010.</p

<i>“Cohort retention”</i> in care stratified by <i>“ART-age cohort”</i> in nine health facilities in Ethiopia, in September 2010.

<p><i>“Cohort retention”</i> in care stratified by <i>“ART-age cohort”</i> in nine health facilities in Ethiopia, in September 2010.</p

Calculating <i>“current retention”</i> in care stratified by <i>“ART-age groups.”</i>

<p>Calculating <i>“current retention”</i> in care stratified by <i>“ART-age groups.”</i></p

Calculating <i>“cohort retention”</i> in care stratified by <i>“ART-age cohorts.”</i>

<p>Calculating <i>“cohort retention”</i> in care stratified by <i>“ART-age cohorts.”</i></p