The Lewis Journals-to-Gas-Price Inflation Index, Chemistry and Physics 2015

What would a gallon of gas cost if gas prices increased at the same rate as subscriptions to scholarly journals

Data points on the growth of international human subjects research

This fact sheet provides a referenced list of data points demonstrating the growth of internationalization in clinical research. In 2008, 78% of all subjects in U.S. funded clinical trials were enrolled in non-U.S. sites

The Interdisciplinary Influence of Library and Information Science 1996–2004: A Journal-to-Journal Citation Analysis

Using citation data from Journal Citation Reports (JCR) 1996–2004, this research replicates Meyer and Spencer's analysis of other-field citations to Library and Information Science (LIS) journals from 1972 to 1994. After 1994, JCR added LIS journals emphasizing empirical, information science research and simultaneously dropped journals addressing the profession of librarianship. The newly added journals attract a broader interdisciplinary readership—a readership reflected in a 14 percent increase in other-field citations of the LIS journals. The LIS journals included in both this and the Meyer and Spencer research, a list dominated by titles frequently read and cited by others in the LIS discipline, have not received an equal increase in other-field citations

Open Peer Review for Digital Humanities Projects: A Modest Proposal

Odell, J. D., Pollock, C. M. J. (2016, April 22). Open Peer Review for Digital Humanities Projects: A Modest Proposal. Working paper presented at THATCamp Indiana 2016. University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN.Promotion and tenure (P&T) values do not always align with to the practice of digital humanities in academic settings. In short, it’s just easier to measure the value of a publication in a well-known journal or a book-length monograph from a trusted university press. Articles are cited and monographs are reviewed, but digital humanities projects are a less-known product--they come in so many flavors and are disseminated by disparate channels. As a result, many digital humanists may be pressured (after investing many hours of labor in a project) to seek validation for their digital projects by writing one or more articles describing the work for traditional peer reviewed outlets. This discourages further work on the digital project, creating a culture in which the project need only be good enough to describe in an article. It also punishes the digital humanist by doubling up on their efforts to meet the bar of P&T. Without new incentive structures that digital humanists can leverage in the P&T process, the adoption of digital humanities practices will lag and the field’s experimental and boundary-testing nature will be diminished. This is a proposal for developing an incentive structure for digital humanities scholarly production