22 research outputs found
Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring in women with pregnancy induced hypertension or mild preeclampsia at term: the HYPITAT trial
Contains fulltext :
53183.pdf ( ) (Open Access)BACKGROUND: Hypertensive disorders, i.e. pregnancy induced hypertension and preeclampsia, complicate 10 to 15% of all pregnancies at term and are a major cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. The only causal treatment is delivery. In case of preterm pregnancies conservative management is advocated if the risks for mother and child remain acceptable. In contrast, there is no consensus on how to manage mild hypertensive disease in pregnancies at term. Induction of labour might prevent maternal and neonatal complications at the expense of increased instrumental vaginal delivery rates and caesarean section rates. METHODS/DESIGN: Women with a pregnancy complicated by pregnancy induced hypertension or mild preeclampsia at a gestational age between 36+0 and 41+0 weeks will be asked to participate in a multi-centre randomised controlled trial. Women will be randomised to either induction of labour or expectant management for spontaneous delivery. The primary outcome of this study is severe maternal morbidity, which can be complicated by maternal mortality in rare cases. Secondary outcome measures are neonatal mortality and morbidity, caesarean and vaginal instrumental delivery rates, maternal quality of life and costs. Analysis will be by intention to treat. In total, 720 pregnant women have to be randomised to show a reduction in severe maternal complications of hypertensive disease from 12 to 6%. DISCUSSION: This trial will provide evidence as to whether or not induction of labour in women with pregnancy induced hypertension or mild preeclampsia (nearly) at term is an effective treatment to prevent severe maternal complications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol is registered in the clinical trial register number ISRCTN08132825
Clinical characteristics of women captured by extending the definition of severe postpartum haemorrhage with 'refractoriness to treatment': a cohort study
Background: The absence of a uniform and clinically relevant definition of severe postpartum haemorrhage
hampers comparative studies and optimization of clinical management. The concept of persistent postpartum
haemorrhage, based on refractoriness to initial first-line treatment, was proposed as an alternative to common
definitions that are either based on estimations of blood loss or transfused units of packed red blood cells
(RBC). We compared characteristics and outcomes of women with severe postpartum haemorrhage captured
by these three types of definitions.
Methods: In this large retrospective cohort study in 61 hospitals in the Netherlands we included 1391 consecutive
women with postpartum haemorrhage who received either ≥4 units of RBC or a multicomponent transfusion. Clinical
characteristics and outcomes of women with severe postpartum haemorrhage defined as persistent postpartum
haemorrhage were compared to definitions based on estimated blood loss or transfused units of RBC within 24 h
following birth. Adverse maternal outcome was a composite of maternal mortality, hysterectomy, arterial embolisation
and intensive care unit admission.
Results: One thousand two hundred sixty out of 1391 women (90.6%) with postpartum haemorrhage fulfilled the
definition of persistent postpartum haemorrhage. The majority, 820/1260 (65.1%), fulfilled this definition within 1 h
following birth, compared to 819/1391 (58.7%) applying the definition of ≥1 L blood loss and 37/845 (4.4%) applying
the definition of ≥4 units of RBC. The definition persistent postpartum haemorrhage captured 430/471 adverse maternal
outcomes (91.3%), compared to 471/471 (100%) for ≥1 L blood loss and 383/471 (81.3%) for ≥4 units of RBC. Persistent
postpartum haemorrhage did not capture all adverse outcomes because of missing data on timing of initial, first-line
treatment.
Conclusion: The definition persistent postpartum haemo
Cost-effectiveness of red blood cell transfusion vs. non-intervention in women with acute anaemia after postpartum haemorrhage
BACKGROUND: Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is frequently used to treat women with acute anaemia after postpartum haemorrhage. We aimed to assess the economic consequences of red blood cell transfusion compared to non-intervention in these women. METHODS: A trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis was performed alongside the Well-Being of Obstetric patients on Minimal Blood transfusions (WOMB) trial. Women with acute anaemia [Hb 4·8-7·9 g/dl (3·0-4·9 mm)] after postpartum haemorrhage, without severe anaemic symptoms, were randomly allocated to RBC transfusion or non-intervention. Primary outcome of the trial was physical fatigue (Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory, scale 4-20; 20 represents maximal fatigue). Total costs per arm were calculated using a hospital perspective with a 6 weeks time horizon. RESULTS: Per woman, mean costs in the RBC transfusion arm (n = 258) were €1957 compared to €1708 in the non-intervention arm (n = 261; P = 0·024). The 13% difference in costs between study arms predominantly originated from costs of RBC units, as costs of RBC units were six times higher in the RBC transfusion arm. RBC transfusion led to a small improvement in physical fatigue of 0·58 points per day; thus, the costs to improve the physical fatigue score with one point would be €431. CONCLUSION: In women with acute anaemia after postpartum haemorrhage (PPH), RBC transfusion is on average €249 more expensive per woman than non-intervention, with only a small gain in HRQoL after RBC transfusion. Taking both clinical and economic consequences into account, implementation of a non-intervention policy seems justified.B. W. Prick, J. J. Duvekot, P. E. van der Moer, N. van Gemund, P. C. M. van der Salm, A. J. G. Jansen, D. J. van Rhenen, B. W. Mol, and C. A. Uyl-de Groo
Cost-effectiveness of red blood cell transfusion vs. non-intervention in women with acute anaemia after postpartum haemorrhage
BackgroundRed blood cell (RBC) transfusion is frequently used to treat women with acute anaemia after postpartum haemorrhage. We aimed to assess the economic consequences of red blood cell transfusion compared to non-intervention in these women. MethodsA trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis was performed alongside the Well-Being of Obstetric patients on Minimal Blood transfusions (WOMB) trial. Women with acute anaemia [Hb 48-79g/dl (30-49mm)] after postpartum haemorrhage, without severe anaemic symptoms, were randomly allocated to RBC transfusion or non-intervention. Primary outcome of the trial was physical fatigue (Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory, scale 4-20; 20 represents maximal fatigue). Total costs per arm were calculated using a hospital perspective with a 6weeks time horizon. ResultsPer woman, mean costs in the RBC transfusion arm (n=258) were Euro1957 compared to Euro1708 in the non-intervention arm (n=261; P=0024). The 13% difference in costs between study arms predominantly originated from costs of RBC units, as costs of RBC units were six times higher in the RBC transfusion arm. RBC transfusion led to a small improvement in physical fatigue of 058 points per day; thus, the costs to improve the physical fatigue score with one point would be Euro431. ConclusionIn women with acute anaemia after postpartum haemorrhage (PPH), RBC transfusion is on average Euro249 more expensive per woman than non-intervention, with only a small gain in HRQoL after RBC transfusion. Taking both clinical and economic consequences into account, implementation of a non-intervention policy seems justified
Effectiveness and safety of different methods for induction of labor in women with a previous cesarean section
Research into fetal development and medicin