Agricultural and empowerment pathways from land ownership to women's nutrition in India.

Land size is an important equity concern for the design of 'nutrition-sensitive' agricultural interventions. We unpack some of the pathways between land and nutrition using a cross-sectional baseline survey data set of 4,480 women from 148 clusters from the 'Upscaling Participatory Action and Videos for Agriculture and Nutrition' trial in Keonjhar district in Odisha, India. Variables used are household ln-land size owned (exposure) and maternal dietary diversity score out of 10 food groups and body mass index (BMI; kg/m2 ) (outcomes); and mediators investigated are production diversity score, value of agricultural production, and indicators for women's empowerment (decision-making in agriculture, group participation, work-free time and land ownership). We assessed mediation using a non-parametric potential outcomes framework method. Land size positively affects maternal dietary diversity scores [β 0.047; 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.011, 0.082)] but not BMI. Production diversity, but not value of production, accounts for 17.6% of total effect mediated. We observe suppression of the effect of land size on BMI, with no evidence of a direct effect for either of the agricultural mediators but indirect effects of β -0.031 [95% CI (-0.048, -0.017)] through production diversity and β -0.047 [95% CI (-0.075, -0.021)] through value of production. An increase in land size positively affects women's decision-making, which in turn negatively affects maternal BMI. The positive effect of work-free time on maternal BMI is suppressed by the negative effect of household land size on work-free time. Agriculture interventions must consider land quality, women's decision-making and implications for women's workload in their design

Economic evaluation of nutrition-sensitive agricultural interventions to increase maternal and child dietary diversity and nutritional status in rural Odisha, India

BACKGROUND: Economic evaluations of nutrition-sensitive agriculture (NSA) interventions are scarce, limiting assessment of their potential affordability and scalability. OBJECTIVE: We conducted cost-consequence analyses of three participatory video-based interventions of fortnightly women's group meetings using: 1) NSA videos; 2) NSA and nutrition-specific videos; or 3) NSA videos with a nutrition-specific Participatory Learning and Action (PLA) cycle. METHODS: Interventions were tested in a 32-month, four-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial, UPAVAN, in Keonjhar district, Odisha, India. Impacts were evaluated in children aged 0-23 months and their mothers. We estimated program costs using data collected prospectively from expenditure records of implementing and technical partners, and societal costs using expenditure assessment of households with a child aged 0-23 months and key informant interviews. Costs were adjusted for inflation, discounted, and converted to 2019 US${\$}$. RESULTS: Total program costs of each intervention ranged from US${\$}$272,121 to US${\$}$386,907. Program costs per pregnant woman or mother of a child aged 0-23 months were US${\$}$62 for NSA videos, US${\$}$84 for NSA and nutrition-specific videos, and US${\$}$78 for NSA videos with PLA (societal costs: US${\$}$125, US${\$}$143, and US${\$}$122 respectively). Substantial shares of total costs constituted developing and delivering the videos and PLA (52-69%) and quality assurance (25-41%). Relative to control, children's minimum dietary diversity was higher in the intervention incorporating nutrition-specific videos (adjusted relative risk [95% CI] 1.19 [1.03, 1.37]) and PLA (1.27 [1.11, 1.46]). Relative to control, mothers' minimum dietary diversity was higher in NSA video (1.21 [1.01, 1.45]), and NSA with PLA (1.30 [1.10, 1.53]) interventions. CONCLUSION: NSA videos with PLA can increase both maternal and child dietary diversity and has the lowest cost per unit increase in diet diversity. Building on investments made in developing UPAVAN, cost-efficiency at scale could be increased with less intensive monitoring, reduced start-up costs, and integration within existing government programs.Trial registration: ISRCTN65922679

How to design a complex behaviour change intervention: experiences from a nutrition-sensitive agriculture trial in rural India.

Many public health interventions aim to promote healthful behaviours, with varying degrees of success. With a lack of existing empirical evidence on the optimal number or combination of behaviours to promote to achieve a given health outcome, a key challenge in intervention design lies in deciding what behaviours to prioritise, and how best to promote them. We describe how key behaviours were selected and promoted within a multisectoral nutrition-sensitive agriculture intervention that aimed to address maternal and child undernutrition in rural India. First, we formulated a Theory of Change, which outlined our hypothesised impact pathways. To do this, we used the following inputs: existing conceptual frameworks, published empirical evidence, a feasibility study, formative research and the intervention team's local knowledge. Then, we selected specific behaviours to address within each impact pathway, based on our formative research, behaviour change models, local knowledge and community feedback. As the intervention progressed, we mapped each of the behaviours against our impact pathways and the transtheoretical model of behaviour change, to monitor the balance of behaviours across pathways and along stages of behaviour change. By collectively agreeing on definitions of complex concepts and hypothesised impact pathways, implementing partners were able to communicate clearly between each other and with intervention participants. Our intervention was iteratively informed by continuous review, by monitoring implementation against targets and by integrating community feedback. Impact and process evaluations will reveal whether these approaches are effective for improving maternal and child nutrition, and what the effects are on each hypothesised impact pathway

Protocol for the cost-consequence and equity impact analyses of a cluster randomised controlled trial comparing three variants of a nutrition-sensitive agricultural extension intervention to improve maternal and child dietary diversity and nutritional status in rural Odisha, India (UPAVAN trial).

BACKGROUND: Undernutrition causes around 3.1 million child deaths annually, around 45% of all child deaths. India has one of the highest proportions of maternal and child undernutrition globally. To accelerate reductions in undernutrition, nutrition-specific interventions need to be coupled with nutrition-sensitive programmes that tackle the underlying causes of undernutrition. This paper describes the planned economic evaluation of the UPAVAN trial, a four-arm, cluster randomised controlled trial that tests the nutritional and agricultural impacts of an innovative agriculture extension platform of women's groups viewing videos on nutrition-sensitive agriculture practices, coupled with a nutrition-specific behaviour-change intervention of videos on nutrition, and a participatory learning and action approach. METHODS: The economic evaluation of the UPAVAN interventions will be conducted from a societal perspective, taking into account all costs incurred by the implementing agency (programme costs), community and health care providers, and participants and their households, and all measurable outcomes associated with the interventions. All direct and indirect costs, including time costs and donated goods, will be estimated. The economic evaluation will take the form of a cost-consequence analysis, comparing incremental costs and incremental changes in the outcomes of the interventions, compared with the status quo. Robustness of the results will be assessed through a series of sensitivity analyses. In addition, an analysis of the equity impact of the interventions will be conducted. DISCUSSION: Evidence on the cost and cost-effectiveness of nutrition-sensitive agriculture interventions is scarce. This limits understanding of the costs of rolling out or scaling up programs. The findings of this economic evaluation will provide useful information for different multisectoral stakeholders involved in the planning and implementation of nutrition-sensitive agriculture programmes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN65922679 . Registered on 21 December 2016

Economic evaluation of nutrition-sensitive agricultural interventions to increase maternal and child dietary diversity and nutritional status in rural Odisha, India.

BACKGROUND: Economic evaluations of nutrition-sensitive agriculture (NSA) interventions are scarce, limiting assessment of their potential affordability and scalability. OBJECTIVE: We conducted cost-consequence analyses of three participatory video-based interventions of fortnightly women's group meetings using: 1) NSA videos; 2) NSA and nutrition-specific videos; or 3) NSA videos with a nutrition-specific Participatory Learning and Action (PLA) cycle. METHODS: Interventions were tested in a 32-month, four-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial, UPAVAN, in Keonjhar district, Odisha, India. Impacts were evaluated in children aged 0-23 months and their mothers. We estimated program costs using data collected prospectively from expenditure records of implementing and technical partners, and societal costs using expenditure assessment of households with a child aged 0-23 months and key informant interviews. Costs were adjusted for inflation, discounted, and converted to 2019 US${\$}$. RESULTS: Total program costs of each intervention ranged from US${\$}$272,121 to US${\$}$386,907. Program costs per pregnant woman or mother of a child aged 0-23 months were US${\$}$62 for NSA videos, US${\$}$84 for NSA and nutrition-specific videos, and US${\$}$78 for NSA videos with PLA (societal costs: US${\$}$125, US${\$}$143, and US${\$}$122 respectively). Substantial shares of total costs constituted developing and delivering the videos and PLA (52-69%) and quality assurance (25-41%). Relative to control, children's minimum dietary diversity was higher in the intervention incorporating nutrition-specific videos (adjusted relative risk [95% CI] 1.19 [1.03, 1.37]) and PLA (1.27 [1.11, 1.46]). Relative to control, mothers' minimum dietary diversity was higher in NSA video (1.21 [1.01, 1.45]), and NSA with PLA (1.30 [1.10, 1.53]) interventions. CONCLUSION: NSA videos with PLA can increase both maternal and child dietary diversity and has the lowest cost per unit increase in diet diversity. Building on investments made in developing UPAVAN, cost-efficiency at scale could be increased with less intensive monitoring, reduced start-up costs, and integration within existing government programs.Trial registration: ISRCTN65922679

Upscaling Participatory Action and Videos for Agriculture and Nutrition (UPAVAN) trial comparing three variants of a nutrition-sensitive agricultural extension intervention to improve maternal and child nutritional outcomes in rural Odisha, India: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial

Abstract Background Maternal and child undernutrition have adverse consequences for pregnancy outcomes and child morbidity and mortality, and they are associated with low educational attainment, economic productivity as an adult, and human wellbeing. ‘Nutrition-sensitive’ agriculture programs could tackle the underlying causes of undernutrition. Methods/design This study is a four-arm cluster randomised controlled trial in Odisha, India. Interventions are as follows: (1) an agricultural extension platform of women’s groups viewing and discussing videos on nutrition-sensitive agriculture (NSA) practices, and follow-up visits to women at home to encourage the adoption of new practices shown in the videos; (2) women’s groups viewing and discussing videos on NSA and nutrition-specific practices, with follow-up visits; and (3) women’s groups viewing and discussing videos on NSA and nutrition-specific practices combined with a cycle of Participatory Learning and Action meetings, with follow-up visits. All arms, including the control, receive basic nutrition training from government community frontline workers. Primary outcomes, assessed at baseline and 32 months after the start of the interventions, are (1) percentage of children aged 6–23 months consuming ≥ 4 out of 7 food groups per day and (2) mean body mass index (BMI) (kg/m2) of non-pregnant, non-postpartum (gave birth > 42 days ago) mothers or female primary caregivers of children aged 0–23 months. Secondary outcomes are percentage of mothers consuming ≥ 5 out of 10 food groups per day and percentage of children’s weight-for-height z-score  70%) proportion of Scheduled Tribe or Scheduled Caste (disadvantaged) households. A process evaluation will assess the quality of implementation and mechanisms behind the intervention effects. A cost-consequence analysis will compare incremental costs and outcomes of the interventions. Discussion This trial will contribute evidence on the impacts of NSA extension through participatory, low-cost, video-based approaches on maternal and child nutrition and on whether integration with nutrition-specific goals and enhanced participatory approaches can increase these impacts. Trial registration ISRCTN , ISRCTN65922679. Registered on 21 December 2016