22 research outputs found

    Jealousy vs Envy: European Cultural Background and Croatian Linguistic Examplesand Examples

    Get PDF
    Speakers of many languages tend to use pairs of words such as emotion/feeling or jealousy/envy interchangeably. This paper explores the differences in the way in which the emotional states of jealousy and envy are understood (in the CroaĀ­tian language ljubomora and zavist) and the influence of culture on the expression of these states. First, we establish the cultural framework that significantly shapes the experience and expression of emotional states, and summarize cognitive aspects of the two emotions. Second, we demonstrate that Croatian 19th- and 20th- century belles lettres differentiate between the two in the way it is described in sciences. Third, a psycholinguistic questionnaire was used to investigate features of the conceptual content from 209 high school students. Finally, the results were compared with the empirical corpus analysis of the linguistic constructions of emotional categories. Complementary methods used in this research show indications of an ongoing semasiological change of ljubomora and zavist in a significant part of Croatian speakers

    European Clerics and Missionaries on Mongols: the Perception of the Steppe Barbarians in Mid-Thirteenth-Century Europe

    Get PDF
    Splitski nadbiskup Rogerije i Toma Arhiđakon autori su jedinih dvaju neposrednih izvjeÅ”taja o mongolskoj provali u Europu 1241./1242. Obojica su s napadačima bili u izravnom doticaju: prvi kao njihov viÅ”emjesečni zarobljenik, drugi kao stanovnik grada Å”to su ga Mongoli umalo podsjeli. Njihovi opisi, nastali u vrijeme provale, uspoređuju se s izvjeÅ”tajima Ivana de Plano Carpini i Vilima od Rubruka koji su nekoliko godina kasnije bili poslani na istok sa zadatkom da istraže razne aspekte života Mongola. Članak je pokuÅ”aj rekonstrukcije razvoja predodžbe koju su Europljani imali o Mongolima (Tatarima), od prvih glasina o njima do kraja 13. stoljeća. Posebna je pažnja dana doživljaju Drugoga, kao i opreci: barbarsko/apokaliptički topos ā€“ ljudi od krvi i mesa.The article starts with a short diachronic introduction on the perception of the Other and the imagery of nomadic peoples (the Huns, Avars, Cumans and Mongols) in the accounts of European authors. Its focus is, however, on the Mongols, their invasion of Europe in 1241/1242 and its consequences, especially concerning the evolution of the European perception of the foreign people. The author comments on the differences in the accounts of English chronicler Matthew Paris, two Central European clerics, Roger of Apulia and Thomas of Split, and two Franciscan travellers to Central Asia, John of Plano Carpini and William of Rubruck. The topic has been dealt with, especially in the last 20 years (by Peter Jackson, Axel Klopprogge, Antti Routsalla, Felicitas Schmieder, etc.), but in this article the author tends systematically to analyse the background of the reports, and the circumstances in which they were written (together with their reception), including the rather neglected works of Roger of Apulia and Thomas of Split, the only two European authors writing in extenso about the Mongol invasion from first-hand experience. Furthermore, special attention is accorded to the contrast between the two topoi (the barbaric and the apocalyptic one) and the eventually demystified image of Mongols, with their flesh-and-blood rather than ā€˜demonicā€™ nature. In the frame of the evolution of the perception from the myth to reality, the following problems have been analysed: the problem of perceiving the nature and origin of the Tatars and their dietary habits (including their alleged cannibalism); the problem of apocalyptic traditions and identification of the Mongols with Godā€™s punishment, and finally the problem of the unprecedented strategic superiority of the Mongol armies and their individual (in)vulnerability. Finally, along with the conclusion on the evolution of perception, there is a short overview of the changed Eurasian relations in the late Middle Ages. The Mongol Empire was short-lived, but the Pax Mongolica opened the boundaries of Asia to Europeans: the exchange between peoples and goods brought the continents closer together
    corecore