84 research outputs found
Ogden and Richardsâ The Meaning of Meaning and early analytic philosophy
C.K. Ogden (1889â1957) and I.A. Richardsâ (1893â1979) The Meaning of Meaning is widely recognised as a classic text of early twentieth-century linguistic semantics and semiotics, but less well known are its links to the âlogical atomismâ of Bertrand Russell (1872â1970), one of the foundational doctrines of analytic philosophy. In this paper a detailed comparison of The Meaning of Meaning and logical atomism is made, in which several key similarities between the two theories in subject matter and approach are identified: both attempt to describe meaning in terms of the latest psychological doctrines and both pursue a normative program aimed at rectifying the perceived deficiencies of language. But there are also a number of differences between the theories. Ogden and Richards â most probably inspired by Victoria Lady Welby (1837â1912) â offered a pragmatically oriented account of ordinary language, while Russell sought a âlogically perfect languageâ beyond interpretation, and rejected the work of Welby and her allies. These differences contributed significantly to Russellâs largely negative opinion of The Meaning of Meaning. Despite this, several ideas pioneered in The Meaning of Meaning re-appear in Russellâs later writings. The Meaning of Meaning, it would seem, not only drew inspiration from Russellâs philosophy but may have also contributed to its further development
International Language and the Everyday: Contact and Collaboration Between C.K. Ogden, Rudolf Carnap and Otto Neurath
Although now largely forgotten, the international language movement was, from the 1880s to the end of the Second World War, a matter of widespread public interest, as well as a concern of numerous scientists and scholars. The primary goal was to establish a language for international communication, but in the early twentieth century an increasing accent was placed on philosophical considerations: wanted was a language better suited to the needs of modern science and rational thought. In this paper, we examine the example of the English scholar C.K. Ogdenâs international language Basic English and his efforts to win the Vienna Circle philosophers Otto Neurath and Rudolf Carnap over to the project. Basic is shown to be an implementation of key ideas in Ogdenâs philosophy of language, ideas shared to a large extent with Neurath and Carnap. This we see through an examination of their unpublished correspondence, as well as through the collaboration that emerged between Ogden and Neurath, in which Neurathâs Isotype, a system for graphically representing statistical data, became closely aligned with Basic. Through the ideas and endeavours we investigate here, we gain a new perspective on this crucial period in the history of analytic philosophy
The application of C.K. Ogdenâs semiotics in Basic English
Although a relatively minor project in terms of its impact on the broader international language movement, Basic English is interesting for the elaborate semiotic theory that lies behind it. The creator of Basic, Charles Kay Ogden (1889â1957), is today remembered chiefly as co-author of The Meaning of Meaning, a book widely regarded as a classic of early twentieth-century semiotics. In this paper, we engage in a critical examination of the design of Basic and demonstrate how it essentially represents an implementation of the key doctrines set out in that book, tempered by the practical exigencies of language construction. We focus on Ogdenâs method of âpanoptic conjugationâ, which he used to select the Basic core vocabulary of 850 words, as well as his conception of the grammar of Basic as an outgrowth of its vocabulary. We observe additionally how Ogdenâs approach does not result in a self-contained, independent international language, but rather a language that is subservient to Standard English idiom
Georg von der Gabelentz
The German sinologist and general linguist Georg von der Gabelentz (1840â1893) occupies an interesting place at the intersection of several streams of linguistic scholarship at the end of the nineteenth century. As Professor of East-Asian languages at the University of Leipzig from 1878 to 1889 and then Professor for Sinology and General Linguistics at the University of Berlin from 1889 until his death, Gabelentz was present at some of the main centers of linguistics at the time. He was, however, generally critical of mainstream historical-comparative linguistics as propagated by the neogrammarians and instead emphasized approaches to language inspired by a line of researchers including Wilhelm von Humboldt (1767â1835), H. Steinthal (1823â1899), and his own father, Hans Conon von der Gabelentz (1807â1874)
Grammar, typology and the Humboldtian tradition in the work of Georg von der Gabelentz
A frequently mentioned if somewhat peripheral figure in the historiography of late nineteenth-century linguistics is the German sinologist and general linguist Georg von der Gabelentz (1840â1893). Today Gabelentz is chiefly remembered for several insights that proved to be productive in the development of subsequent schools and subdisciplines. In this paper, we examine two of these insights, his analytic and synthetic systems of grammar and his foundational work on typology. We show how they were intimately connected within his conception of linguistic research, and how this was in turn embedded in the tradition established by Wilhelm von Humboldt (1767â1835), especially as it was further developed by H. Steinthal (1823â1899). This paper goes beyond several previous works with a similar focus by drawing on a wider range of Gabelentzâ writings, including manuscript sources that have only recently been published, and by examining specific textual connections between Gabelentz and his predecessors
The diachronic evolution of directional constructions in Mandarin
This thesis investigates the diachronic evolution of directional constructions found in Mandarin and other modern varieties of Chinese. What I call directional constructions are usually called 'directional complements' in most work on Chinese grammar. They consist of a series of particles and their associated syntactic constructions. The particles follow after verbs and typically indicate a direction of motion associated with the event expressed by a verb. For example, in the sentence 'ta zouchulai' 'He walks out hither', the verb 'zou' 'walk' expresses the action of walking and the directional particle 'chulai' indicates that the action is performed going from inside to outside and in the direction of the speaker. Directional particles can also have a variety of abstract senses that are derived from their basic directional senses through metaphor. I trace the diachronic evolution of the directional particles and their associated syntactic constructions from their origins as independent verbs in various syntactic constructions in pre-Qin varieties of Chinese up to their present state in Modern Mandarin. I identify the various formal and functional properties of the constructions at each stage in the history of the language and show how these properties change from one stage to another. I also investigate the factors that condition these changes. My research is based on a corpus of vernacular texts that cover each period in the development of the constructions from pre-Qin times up to the present. I present my analysis of each stage in the development of the constructions within the Construction Grammar framework
Linguistic Aesthetics from the Nineteenth to the Twentieth Century: The Case of Otto Jespersenâs âProgress in Languageâ
From the early nineteenth century up until the first half of the twentieth century, many leading scholars in the emerging field of linguistics were occupied with what would today be considered a kind of linguistic typology. The various classifications of languages they proposed were generally intertwined with speculation about the âracialâ traits or national mentalities that different language types might represent and their putative value relative to one another. This article investigates these schemes from the perspective of Otto Jespersenâs (1860â1943) theory of âprogress in language.â It first shows how Jespersen, inspired by theoretical developments in linguistics and neighboring sciences, inverted the traditional rankings and praised the modern âanalyticâ European languages over their classical âsyntheticâ ancestors. It then explores contemporary reactions to Jespersenâs theory and traces the gradual disappearance of language evaluation and related questions from the discipline. Charles Bally (1865â1947) receives special attention for his nuanced critique of Jespersenâs position, which casts unique light on linguistic ideology in the period that saw the birth of structuralism in its different varieties
Meaning in the Age of Modernism: C. K. Ogden and his contemporaries
This dissertation is a historical study of influential currents in the philosophy of language and linguistics of the first half of the twentieth century, explored from the perspective of the English scholar C. K. Ogden (1889â1957). Although no âGreat Manâ in his own right, Ogden had a personal connection, reflected in his work, to several of the most significant figures of the age. The background to the ideas espoused in Ogdenâs book The Meaning of Meaning, co-authored with I.A. Richards (1893â1979), is examined in detail, along with the application of these ideas in his international language project Basic English. A richly interlaced network of connections is revealed between early analytic philosophy, semiotics and linguistics, all inevitably shaped by the contemporary cultural and political environment. In particular, significant interaction is shown between Ogdenâs ideas, the varying versions of âlogical atomismâ of Bertrand Russell (1872â1970) and Ludwig Wittgensten (1889â1951), Victoria Lady Welbyâs (1837â1912) âsignificsâ, and the philosophy and political activism of Otto Neurath (1882â1945) and Rudolf Carnap (1891â1970) of the Vienna Circle. Amid these interactions emerges a previously little known mutual exchange between the academic philosophy and linguistics of the period and the practically oriented efforts of the international language movement. In exploring these connections, novel light is shed on the intellectual history of a period crucial in the development of both linguistics and philosophy
Ferdinand de Saussure
This chapter is one of a series of interviews with leading scholars on individual figures and movements in the history of linguistics. Ferdinand de Saussure was the founder of the field in its modern form, and the chapter considers the nature of his work and its relationship to that which preceded and followed it. It maintains that there is an economy of originality in academic work which regulates the balance between originality and continuity, and that Saussure's work is extraordinary in how it operates that economy
Language Complexity in Historical Perspective: The Enduring Tropes of Natural Growth and Abnormal Contact
Focusing on the work of John McWhorter and, to a lesser extent, Peter Trudgill, this paper critically examines some common themes in language complexity research from the perspective of intellectual history. The present-day conception that increase in language complexity is somehow a ânaturalâ process which is disturbed under the âabnormalâ circumstances of language contact is shown to be a recapitulation of essentially Romantic ideas that go back to the beginnings of disciplinary linguistics. A similar genealogy is demonstrated for the related notion that grammatical complexity is a kind of âornamentâ on language, surplus to the needs of âbasic communication.â The paper closes by examining the implications of these ideas for linguistic scholarship
- âŠ