64 research outputs found

    Inferring spatial variations in velocity profiles and bed geometry of natural debris flows based on discharge estimates from high-frequency 3D LiDAR point clouds; Illgraben, Switzerland

    Get PDF
    More detailed field measurements are required for a better understanding of surging debris flows. In this work, we analyze a debris flow at the field-scale using timelapse point clouds from a high-resolution, high-frequency 3D LiDAR sensor, which has been installed over a check dam on the fan of the Illgraben catchment in Switzerland. In our investigations, we manually measured the front velocity and tracked individual features such as large boulders and woody debris over a 25 m long channel segment. We observed a change in the front velocity as well as a difference in the velocity of large boulders and woody debris (vboulder ≈ 0.6 vwood) during the second surge of the event. We also estimated the discharge for different closely spaced channel sections based on automated measurements of the cross-sectional area and the surface velocity, which enabled us to infer spatial variations in the bed geometry and the velocity profile. From the discharge estimates, we then derived the volume of this event. Over the course of the next year, the amount of field-scale LiDAR data from the Illgraben will increase substantially and allow for an even more detailed analysis of fundamental debris-flow processes

    Decreasing landslide erosion on steeper slopes in soil‐mantled landscapes

    Get PDF
    Slope‐stability models predict that steeper hillslopes require smaller hydrological triggers for shallow landslides to occur due to the added downslope pull of gravity, which should result in more frequent landslides and faster erosion. However, field observations indicate that landslide frequency does not consistently increase on steeper hillslopes. Here, we use measurements of 1,096 soil landslides in California and Switzerland, and a compilation of landslide geometries, to show that steeper hillslopes typically have thinner soils and that thin soils inhibit landslides due to enhanced roles of cohesion and boundary stresses. We find that the landscape‐averaged landslide erosion depth peaks near the threshold slope for instability, and it drops to half that value on hillslopes that are just 5° to 10° steeper. We propose that faster rates of soil creep on steeper slopes cause thin and more stable soils, which in turn reduces landslide erosion, despite the added pull of gravity

    Insights into Rock-Ice Avalanche Dynamics by Combined Analysis of Seismic Recordings and a Numerical Avalanche Mode

    Get PDF
    Rock‐ice avalanches larger than 1 × 106 m3 are high‐magnitude, low‐frequency events that may occur in all ice‐covered, high mountain areas around the world and can cause extensive damage if they reach populated regions. The temporal and spatial evolution of the seismic signature from two events was analyzed, and recordings at selected stations were compared to numerical model results of avalanche propagation. The first event is a rock‐ice avalanche from Iliamna volcano in Alaska which serves as a “natural laboratory” with simple geometric conditions. The second one originated on Aoraki/Mt. Cook, New Zealand Southern Alps, and is characterized by a much more complex topography. A dynamic numerical model was used to calculate total avalanche momentum, total kinetic energy, and total frictional work rate, among other parameters. These three parameters correlate with characteristics of the seismic signature such as duration and signal envelopes, while other parameters such as flow depths, flow path and deposition geometry are well in agreement with observations. The total frictional work rate shows the best correlation with the absolute seismic amplitude, suggesting that it may be used as an independent model evaluation criterion and in certain cases as model calibration parameter. The good fit is likely because the total frictional work rate represents the avalanche ’s energy loss rate, part of which is captured by the seismometer. Deviations between corresponding calculated and measured parameters result from site and path effects which affect the recorded seismic signal or indicate deficiencies of the numerical model. The seismic recordings contain additional information about when an avalanche reaches changes in topography along the runout path and enable more accurate velocity calculations. The new concept of direct comparison of seismic and avalanche modeling data helps to constrain the numerical model input parameters and to improve the understanding of (rock‐ice) avalanche dynamics

    Evaluation of a method to calculate debris-flow volume based on observations of flow depth

    Get PDF
    The volume of a debris flow is a critical parameter in hazard analysis, yet accurate estimates of volume are often unavailable due to mixing with larger rivers at the downstream end of alluvial fans. We describe a method to calculate the volume of debris flows using flow depth data collected at a check dam, using a Manning friction relation to describe the velocity of the debris flow as a function of flow depth, and the geometry of the channel cross section. The method is evaluated using a published data set from the USGS debris-flow flume where event volume and stage information have been accurately measured, and results in volume estimates either somewhat smaller than or up to 50% larger than observed volumes. We further demonstrate the method to single-surge and a multiple-surge debris flows observed at Illgraben

    Debris-flow monitoring with high-frequency LiDAR scanners: A new method to infer the internal dynamics of debris flows

    Get PDF
    In-situ measurements of debris-flow properties are crucial for understanding their movement mechanisms and quantifying their impact. Here we present the first results of a field monitoring campaign, at Illgraben, Switzerland, to measure debris-flow parameters using high temporal (10 Hz) and spatial resolution LiDAR sensors at several locations along the channel. The point cloud data is projected onto video images to enhance visualization and aid in the interpretation of the measurements. We process the data using machine vision and deep learning based algorithms, and show that this system can accurately measure front and flow surface velocity, flow depth and bed elevation change, as well as the size, style of motion (e.g. rotating or floating without rotation) and trajectories of individual particles. This system thus provides a promising new method for inferring the internal dynamics of debris flows

    Fluid effects in model granular flows

    Get PDF
    Pore fluid plays a crucial role in many granular flows, especially those in geophysical settings. However, the transition in behaviour between dry flows and fully saturated flows and the underlying physics that relate to this are poorly understood. In this paper, we report the results of small-scale flume experiments using monodisperse granular particles with varying water content and volume in which the basal pore pressure, total pressure, flow height and velocity profile were measured at a section. We compare the results with theoretical profiles for granular flow and with flow regimes based on dimensional analysis. The runout and the centre of mass were also calculated from the deposit surface profiles. As the initial water content by mass was increased from zero to around 10%, we first observed a drop in mobility by approximately 50%, as surface tension caused cohesive behaviour due to matric suction. As the water content was further increased up to 45%, the mobility also increased dramatically, with increased flow velocity up to 50%, increased runout distance up to 240% and reduced travel angle by up to 10° compared to the dry case. These effects can be directly related to the basal pore pressure, with both negative pressures and positive pore pressures being measured relative to atmospheric during the unsteady flow. We find that the initial flow volume plays a role in the development of relative pore pressure, such that, at a fixed relative water content, larger flows exhibit greater positive pore pressures, greater velocities and greater relative runout distances. This aligns with many other granular experiments and field observations. Our findings suggest that the fundamental role of the pore fluid is to reduce frictional contact forces between grains thus increasing flow velocity and bulk mobility. While this can occur by the development of excess pore pressure, it can also occur where the positive pore pressure is not in excess of hydrostatic, as shown here, since buoyancy and lubrication alone will reduce frictional forces. Graphical abstract

    DebrisInterMixing-2.3: a finite volume solver for three-dimensional debris-flow simulations with two calibration parameters. Part 2: Model validation with experiments

    Get PDF
    Here, we present validation tests of the fluid dynamic solver presented in von Boetticher et al. (2016), simulating both laboratory-scale and large-scale debris-flow experiments. The new solver combines a Coulomb viscoplastic rheological model with a Herschel-Bulkley model based on material properties and rheological characteristics of the analyzed debris flow. For the selected experiments in this study, all necessary material properties were known - the content of sand, clay (including its mineral composition) and gravel as well as the water content and the angle of repose of the gravel. Given these properties, two model parameters are sufficient for calibration, and a range of experiments with different material compositions can be reproduced by the model without recalibration. One calibration parameter, the Herschel-Bulkley exponent, was kept constant for all simulations. The model validation focuses on different case studies illustrating the sensitivity of debris flows to water and clay content, channel curvature, channel roughness and the angle of repose. We characterize the accuracy of the model using experimental observations of flow head positions, front velocities, run-out patterns and basal pressures.Peer ReviewedPostprint (published version
    corecore