Heterogeneous substitution systems revisited

Matthes and Uustalu (TCS 327(1-2):155-174, 2004) presented a categorical description of substitution systems capable of capturing syntax involving binding which is independent of whether the syntax is made up from least or greatest fixed points. We extend this work in two directions: we continue the analysis by creating more categorical structure, in particular by organizing substitution systems into a category and studying its properties, and we develop the proofs of the results of the cited paper and our new ones in UniMath, a recent library of univalent mathematics formalized in the Coq theorem prover.Comment: 24 page

Verification of redecoration for infinite triangular matrices using coinduction

International audienceFinite triangular matrices with a dedicated type for the diagonal elements can be profitably represented by a nested data type, i. e., a heterogeneous family of inductive data types, while infinite triangular matrices form an example of a nested coinductive type, which is a heterogeneous family of coinductive data types. Redecoration for infinite triangular matrices is taken up from previous work involving the first author, and it is shown that redecoration forms a comonad with respect to bisimilarity. The main result, however, is a validation of the original algorithm against a model based on infinite streams of infinite streams. The two formulations are even provably equivalent, and the second is identified as a special instance of the generic cobind operation resulting from the well-known comultiplication operation on streams that creates the stream of successive tails of a given stream. Thus, perhaps surprisingly, the verification of redecoration is easier for infinite triangular matrices than for their finite counterpart. All the results have been obtained and are fully formalized in the current version of the Coq theorem proving environment where these coinductive datatypes are fully supported since the version 8.1, released in 2007. Nonetheless, instead of displaying the Coq development, we have chosen to write the paper in standard mathematical and type-theoretic language. Thus, it should be accessible without any specific knowledge about Coq

On a Dynamic Logic for Graph Rewriting

International audienceInitially introduced by P. Balbiani, R. Echahed and A.Herzig, this dynamic logic is useful to talk about properties on termgraphs and to characterize transformations on these graphs. Also are presented the deterministic labelled graphs for which the logical framework is designed. This logic has been the starting point of a formal development, using the Coq proof assistant, to design a logical and algorithmic framework useful for verifyin and proving graph rewriting. The formalization allowed us to figure out some ambiguities in the involved concepts. This formalization is not the topic here but the clear view brought to us by the formal work, so the results will be expressed using the original mathematical objects of this logic. Some problems of this logic are demonstrated, relatively to the representation of graph rewriting. Some are minor issues but some are far more important for the adequation between the formulas about graph rewriting and the actual rewriting systems. Invalidating some resulting propositions, solutions are given to reestablish the logical characterization of graph rewriting, which was the initial purpose

Formalizing Monoidal Categories and Actions for Syntax with Binders

We discuss some aspects of our work on the mechanization of syntax and semantics in the UniMath library, based on the proof assistant Coq. We focus on experiences where Coq (as a type-theoretic proof assistant with decidable typechecking) made us use more theory or helped us to see theory more clearly.Comment: Abstract for a talk at CoqPL 2023, https://popl23.sigplan.org/details/CoqPL-2023-papers/7/Formalizing-Monoidal-Categories-and-Actions-for-Syntax-with-Binder

Martin Hofmann’s case for non-strictly positive data types

We describe the breadth-first traversal algorithm by Martin Hofmann that usesa non-strictly positive data type and carry out a simple verification in anextensional setting. Termination is shown by implementing the algorithm inthe strongly normalising extension of system F by Mendler-style recursion.We then analyze the same algorithm by alternative verifications in anintensional setting, in a setting with non-strictly positive inductivedefinitions (not just non-strictly positive data types), and one by algebraicreduction. The verification approaches are compared in terms of notions ofsimulation and should elucidate the somewhat mysterious algorithm and thusmake a case for other uses of non-strictly positive data types. Except forthe termination proof, which cannot be formalised in Coq, all proofs wereformalised in Coq and some of the algorithms were implemented in Agda andHaskell

A Coinductive Approach to Proof Search

National audienceWe propose to study proof search from a coinductive point of view. In this paper, we consider intuitionistic logic and a focused system based on Herbelin's LJT for the implicational fragment. We introduce a variant of lambda calculus with potentially infinitely deep terms and a means of expressing alternatives for the description of the "solution spaces" (called Böhm forests), which are a representation of all (not necessarily well-founded but still locally well-formed) proofs of a given formula (more generally: of a given sequent). As main result we obtain, for each given formula, the reduction of a coinductive definition of the solution space to a effective coinductive description in a finitary term calculus with a formal greatest fixed-point operator. This reduction works in a quite direct manner for the case of Horn formulas. For the general case, the naive extension would not even be true. We need to study "co-contraction" of contexts (contraction bottom-up) for dealing with the varying contexts needed beyond the Horn fragment, and we point out the appropriate finitary calculus, where fixed-point variables are typed with sequents. Co-contraction enters the interpretation of the formal greatest fixed points - curiously in the semantic interpretation of fixed-point variables and not of the fixed-point operator

Verification of the Schorr-Waite Algorithm - From Trees to Graphs

16 pagesInternational audienceThis article proposes a method for proving the correctness of graph algorithms by manipulating their spanning trees enriched with additional references. We illustrate this concept with a proof of the correctness of a (pseudo-)imperative version of the Schorr-Waite algorithm by re finement of a functional one working on trees. It is composed of two orthogonal steps of re finement -- functional to imperative and tree to graph -- fi nally merged to obtain the result. Our imperative speci fications use monadic constructs and syntax sugar, making them close to common imperative languages. This work has been realized within the Isabelle/HOL proof assistant

Verification of redecoration for infinite triangular matrices using coinduction

Finite triangular matrices with a dedicated type for the diagonal elements can be profitably represented by a nested data type, i. e., a heterogeneous family of inductive data types, while infinite triangular matrices form an example of a nested coinductive type, which is a heterogeneous family of coinductive data types. Redecoration for infinite triangular matrices is taken up from previous work involving the first author, and it is shown that redecoration forms a comonad with respect to bisimilarity. The main result, however, is a validation of the original algorithm against a model based on infinite streams of infinite streams. The two formulations are even provably equivalent, and the second is identified as a special instance of the generic cobind operation resulting from the well-known comultiplication operation on streams that creates the stream of successive tails of a given stream. Thus, perhaps surprisingly, the verification of redecoration is easier for infinite triangular matrices than for their finite counterpart. All the results have been obtained and are fully formalized in the current version of the Coq theorem proving environment where these coinductive datatypes are fully supported since the version 8.1, released in 2007. Nonetheless, instead of displaying the Coq development, we have chosen to write the paper in standard mathematical and type-theoretic language. Thus, it should be accessible without any specific knowledge about Coq

Displayed Monoidal Categories for the Semantics of Linear Logic

We present a formalization of different categorical structures used to interpret linear logic. Our formalization takes place in UniMath, a library of univalent mathematics based on the Coq proof assistant.All the categorical structures we formalize are based on monoidal categories. As such, one of our contributions is a practical, usable library of formalized results on monoidal categories. Monoidal categories carry a lot of structure, and instances of monoidal categories are often built from complicated mathematical objects. This can cause challenges of scalability, regarding both the vast amount of data to be managed by the user of the library, as well as the time the proof assistant spends on checking code. To enable scalability, and to avoid duplication of computer code in the formalization, we develop "displayed monoidal categories". These gadgets allow for the modular construction of complicated monoidal categories by building them in layers; we demonstrate their use in many examples. Specifically, we define linear-non-linear categories and construct instances of them via Lafont categories and linear categories