Arcrekonstrukciós és orthognath műtétek tervezési lehetőségei háromdimenziós képalkotói módszerekkel

We summarize up-to-date planning technics of orthognathic and reconstructive surgery operation which appeared with three-dimensional imaging, using literature data and some clinical examples. In many cases, orthognathic and reconstructive operations mean the only treatment of facial deformity caused by tumour, traumatic injury or congenital anomaly. In this field, radiology plays an important role not only in the diagnosis but also in the planning of the treatment. With the appearance of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), the previously used two-dimensional cephalometric analysis on lateral cephalogram was changed for three-dimensional cephalometric measurements. The first step of the adaptation was the lateral and frontal x-ray images generated from the CBCT database and later the volume rendered surface and segmentation technics provided the moving of the facial bones in three dimensions which meant virtual surgical planning. With the development of CAD/CAM technic and the three-dimensional printing, many opportunities became available, such as preoperative bending splints and plates and printed surgical model for the tangible planning. The progress of imaging facilitated the individual, accurate, and reliable planning which significantly determines the success of the treatment

Landmark-based midsagittal plane analysis in patients with facial symmetry and asymmetry based on CBCT analysis tomography

Purpose Reconstruction of the facial midplane is relevant in anthropometry, orthodontics, maxillofacial surgery, and the accurate measurement of symmetry deviation is relevant in many fields of medicine especially when planning surgical treatment. In the literature, three different means of midplane generation have been published; however, there is currently no consensus regarding the approach to use. Morphometric methods are used to determine the true midsagittal plane (MSP), but its use in clinical practice is difficult. Aregression plane based on N-ANS-PNS landmarks reportedly approximates the morphometric MSP. As these points are vulnerable, we investigated which combination of landmarks can be substituted in symmetric and asymmetric faces. Patients and methods Thirty symmetric and 30asymmetric faces were analyzed on cone-beam computed tomography scans. A total of 50 regression planes were generated based on three unpaired landmarks and 35 regression planes were generated based the midpoints of paired landmarks. The Na-ANS-PNS plane was used as reference plane, and the mean angle between it and each generated MSP was calculated. The differences from the reference plane were compared by t-test between the groups. Results In the symmetric group, 86% of angles deviated by <5 degrees using unpaired points, whereby 74% of angles deviated by <5 degrees for paired points. Between the two groups 50% of planes from midline points, and 77% of planes from paired points were significantly different. All planes deviated more in the asymmetric group. Conclusions The N-ANS-PNS reference plane can be substituted with the following combinations: ANS-G-Ba, ANS-G-S, ANS-S-De, PNS-G-Ba, PNS-S-Ba, PNS-ANS-G, and PNS-N-Ba

Measurement of orbital volume after enucleation and orbital implantation.

INTRODUCTION: This article reports experience relating to the measurement of orbital volume by means of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and Cranioviewer program software in patients who have undergone enucleation and orbital implantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: CBCT scans were made in 30 cases, 10 of which were later excluded because of various technical problems. The study group therefore consisted of 20 patients (8 men and 12 women). The longest follow-up time was 7 years, and the shortest was 1 year. In all 20 cases, the orbital volume was measured with Cranioviewer orbital program software. Slices were made in the ventrodorsal direction at 4.8 mm intervals in the frontal plane, in both bony orbits (both that containing the orbital implant and the healthy one). Similar measurements were made in 20 patients with various dental problems. CBCT scans were recorded for the facial region of the skull, containing the orbital region. The Cranioviewer program can colour the area of the slices red, and it automatically measures the area in mm. RESULTS: In 5 of the 20 cases, the first 4 or all 5 slices revealed that the volume of the operated orbit was significantly smaller than that of the healthy orbit, in 12 cases only from 1 to 3 of the slices indicated such a significant difference, and in 3 cases no differences were observed between the orbits. In the control group of patients with various dental problems, there was no significant difference between the two healthy orbits. The accuracy of the volume measurements was assessed statistically by means of the paired samples t-test. SUMMARY: To date, no appropriate method is avaliable for exact measurement of the bony orbital volume, which would be of particular importance in orbital injury reconstruction. However, the use of CBCT scans and Cranioviewer orbital program software appears to offer a reliable method for the measurement of changes in orbital volume

Data on the study group patients.

<p>Data on the study group patients.</p

The bony orbital border is denoted by a green line.

<p>The bony orbital border is denoted by a green line.</p

The orbital frame is denoted by red and blue lines in the axial scan.

<p>The orbital frame is denoted by red and blue lines in the axial scan.</p