7 research outputs found

    Evaluation of the Acute Kidney Injury Network criteria in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis and ascites.

    No full text
    BACKGROUND AND AIMS: For several years hepatologists have defined acute renal failure in patients with cirrhosis as an increase in serum creatinine (sCr) \u2a7e 50% to a final value of sCr > 1.5 mg/dl (conventional criterion). Recently, the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) defined acute renal failure as acute kidney injury (AKI) on the basis of an absolute increase in sCr of 0.3 mg/dL or a percentage increase in sCr\u2a7e 50% providing also a staging from 1 to 3. AKIN stage 1 was defined as increase in sCr \u2a7e 0.3 mg/dl or an increase in sCr \u2a7e 1.5-fold to 2-fold from baseline. AKI diagnosed with the two different criteria was evaluated for the prediction of in-hospital mortality METHODS: Consecutive hospitalized patients with cirrhosis and ascites were included in the study and evaluated for the development of AKI. RESULTS: Conventional criterion was found to be more accurate than AKIN criteria in improving the prediction of in-hospital mortality in a model including age and Child-Turcotte-Pugh score. The addition of either progression of AKIN stage or a threshold value for sCr of 1.5 mg/dl further improves the value of AKIN criteria in this model. More in detail, patients with AKIN stage 1 and sCr < 1.5 mg/dl had a lower mortality rate (P=0.03), a lower progression rate (P=0.01) and a higher improvement rate (P=0.025) than patients with AKIN stage 1 and sCr \u2a7e 1.5 mg/dl. CONCLUSIONS: Conventional criterion is more accurate than AKIN criteria in the prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients with cirrhosis and ascites. The addition of either the progression of AKIN stage or the cut-off of sCr \u2a7e1.5 mg/dl, to the AKIN criteria improves their prognostic accuracy

    Renal failure and bacterial infections in patients with cirrhosis: Epidemiology and clinical features

    No full text
    The aim of the study was to investigate the prevalence and clinical course of renal failure that was induced by the various types of bacterial infections in patients with cirrhosis and ascites. Three hundred and nine patients, who were consecutively admitted to the 3 major hospitals of Padova, Italy, during the first 6 months of 2005, were studied prospectively. Of these, 233 patients (75.4%) had evidence of ascites. In 104 patients with cirrhosis and ascites (44.6%) a bacterial infection was diagnosed. A bacterial infection-induced renal failure was observed in 35 of 104 patients (33.6%). The prevalence of renal failure was higher in biliary or gastrointestinal tract infections and in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) and in than in other types of infections. In addition, the progressive form of renal failure was only precipitated by biliary or gastrointestinal tract infections, SBP, and urinary tract infections (UTI). In a multivariate analysis only MELD score (P = 0.001), the peak count of neutrophil leukocyte in blood (P = 0.04), and the lack of resolution of infection (P = 0.03) had an independent predictive value on the occurrence of renal failure. CONCLUSION: The results of the study show that the development of bacterial-induced renal failure in patients with cirrhosis and ascites is related to the MELD score, and to both the severity and the lack of resolution of the infection. A progressive form of renal failure occurs only as a consequence of biliary or gastrointestinal tract infections, SBP, and UTI
    corecore