34 research outputs found
Use of evidence-based pharmacotherapy after myocardial infarction in Estonia
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Mortality from cardiovascular disease in Estonia is among the highest in Europe. The reasons for this have not been clearly explained. Also, there are no studies available examining outpatient drug utilization patterns in patients who suffered from acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in Estonia. The objective of the present study was to examine drug utilization in different age and gender groups following AMI in Estonia.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Patients admitted to hospital with AMI (ICD code I21-I22) during the period of 01.01.2004-31.12.2005 and who survived more than 30 days were followed 365 days from the index episode. Data about reimbursed prescriptions of beta-blockers (BBs), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers (ACE/ARBs) and statins for these patients was obtained from the database of the Estonian Health Insurance Fund. Data were mainly analysed using frequency tables and, where appropriate, the Pearson's Ï2 test, the Mann-Whitney U-test and the t-test were used. A logistic regression method was used to investigate the relationship between drug allocation and age and gender. We presented drug utilization data as defined daily dosages (DDD) per life day in four age groups and described proportions of different combinations used in men and women.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Four thousand nine hundred patients were hospitalized due to AMI and 3854 of them (78.7%) were treated by BBs, ACE/ARBs and/or statins. Of the 4025 inpatients who survived more than 30 days, 3799 (94.4%) were treated at least by the one of drug groups studied. Median daily dosages differed significantly between men and women in the age group 60-79 years for BBs and ACE/ARBs, respectively. Various combinations of the drugs studied were not allocated in equal proportions for men and women, although the same combinations were the most frequently used for both genders. The logistic regression analysis adjusted to gender and age revealed that some combinations of drugs were not allocated similarly in different age and gender groups.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Most of the patients were prescribed at least one of commonly recommended drugs. Only 40% of them were treated by combinations of beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers and statins, which is inconsistent with guideline recommendations in Estonia. Standards of training and quality programs in Estonia should be reviewed and updated aiming to improve an adherence to guidelines of management of acute myocardial infarction in all age and gender groups.</p
Statiinide kasutamine mĂŒokardiinfarktijĂ€rgsel perioodil
Statiine ordineeritakse jĂ€rjest sagedamini sĂŒdame-veresoonkonnahaigustega patsientidel. Nad on efektiivsed nii haiguse primaarseks preventsiooniks kui ka mĂŒokardiinfarkti ravis. Uurimuses on hinnatud statiinravi kasutamist mĂŒokardiinfarkti pĂ”denud haigetel.
Eesti Arst 2005; 84 (10): 710â71
MĂŒokardiinfarkti diagnoosimise kriteeriumid 2007
MĂŒokardiinfarkt (MI) on ĂŒks sagedasemaid surma ja töövĂ”imetuse pĂ”hjuseid maailmas ning seega on diagnoosi kriteeriumite tĂ€pne mÀÀratlemine ja rahvusvaheline ĂŒhtlustamine oluline nii haige kui ka ĂŒhiskonna seisukohast. MĂŒokardiinfarkt on epidemioloogiliselt ĂŒhe peamise terviseprobleemi indikaator ning laialdaselt kasutusel kliinilistesse uuringutesse kaasamise kriteeriumi ja tulemusnĂ€itajana. Ăhtne arusaam diagnoosist vĂ”imaldab teadusuuringuid paremini omavahel vĂ”rrelda ja teha erinevate uuringute tulemuste analĂŒĂŒse.
Eesti Arst 2008; 87(6):411â41
MĂŒokardiinfarkti neljas universaalne definitsioon
Euroopa Kardioloogide Seltsi juhendmaterjal, tunnustanud ja kohandanud Eesti Kardioloogide Selts, Eesti Laborimeditsiini Ăhing ja Eesti Radioloogia Ăhing
Sex-specific outcomes of diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention: a register linkage study
BACKGROUND: The presence of diabetes mellitus poses a challenge in the treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We aimed to evaluate the sex-specific outcomes of diabetic and non-diabetic patients with AMI who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: Data of the Estonian Myocardial Infarction Registry for years 2006â2009 were linked with the Health Insurance Fund database and the Population Registry. Hazard ratios (HRs) with the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the primary composite outcome (non-fatal AMI, revascularization, or death whichever occurred first) and for the secondary outcome (all cause mortality) were calculated comparing diabetic with non-diabetic patients by sex. RESULTS: In the final study population (n = 1652), 14.6% of the men and 24.0% of the women had diabetes. Overall, the diabetics had higher rates of cardiovascular risk factors, co-morbidities, and 3â4 vessel disease among both men and women (p < 0.01). Among women, the diabetic patients were younger, they presented later and less often with typical symptoms of chest pain than the non-diabetics (p < 0.01). Women with diabetes received aspirin and reperfusion for ST-segment elevation AMI less often than those without diabetes (p < 0.01). During a follow-up of over two years, in multivariate analysis, diabetes was associated with worse outcomes only in women: the adjusted HR for the primary outcome 1.44 (95% CI 1.05 â 1.96) and for the secondary outcome 1.83 (95% CI 1.17 â 2.89). These results were largely driven by a high (12.0%) mortality during hospitalization of diabetic women. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetic women with AMI who have undergone PCI are a high-risk group warranting special attention in treatment strategies, especially during hospitalization. There is a need to improve the expertise to detect AMI earlier, decrease disparities in management, and find targeted PCI strategies with adjunctive antithrombotic regimes in women with diabetes
MĂŒokardiinfarktiga haige kĂ€sitlus Eesti haiglates 2007. aastal. Eksperdihinnang
Eesti Kardioloogide Seltsi ja Eesti Haigekassa koostöös valminud eksperdihinnang Ă€geda mĂŒokardiinfarkti ravikĂ€sitluse kohta Eesti haiglates 2007. a nĂ€itab, et vĂ”rreldes 2001. a on toimunud positiivne areng. Paranenud on koronarograafia kĂ€ttesaadavus ning tĂ”enduspĂ”histe ravimite kasutamine, mĂ”nes haiglas on kasutusele vĂ”etud Ă€geda koronaarhaige haigusloo vorme ning koostatud tegevusjuhendeid. TĂ€napĂ€evast ravikĂ€sitlust negatiivselt mĂ”jutavatest teguritest on esiplaanil nii sisulised kui ka vormilised haiguslugude tĂ€itmise probleemid, esmase EKG teostamise ja interpreteerimise kiirus, samuti varieeruvad reperfusioonravi rakendamise aluseks olevad otsused. VajakajÀÀmiste kĂ”rvaldamiseks on oluline luua tingimused ravijuhendite koostamise ja uuendamise ning koolituse kulude katteks riiklikul tasemel.
Eesti Arst 2009; 88(9):552â55
SĂŒdame isheemiatĂ”ve riski ennustamine geneetiliste markerite abil
SĂŒdame isheemiatĂ”bi on komplekshaigus, mille avaldumises on roll keskkonnal, eluviisil, pĂ€rilikkusel ja nende koosmĂ”judel. Haiguse tekkeriski vĂ”imalikult varajane ja tĂ€pne hindamine on ennetava ravi mÀÀramise nurgakiviks. Kasutusel olevates riskiskoorides ei ole vĂ”etud arvesse pĂ€rilikkust, kuigi selle osakaalu sĂŒdame isheemiatĂ”ve kujunemisel hinnatakse 40â60%-ni.Uute meetodite jĂ”udmine geneetiliste uuringute paletti on toonud kaasa enam kui 50 sĂŒdame isheemiatĂ”ve avaldumise riskiga soetud geneetilise markeri tuvastamise. Leitud markerite kombineerimine vĂ”imaldab koostada polĂŒgeense riskiskoori, mis aitab seni klassikalistel riskiteguritel pĂ”hinenud riski hindamist ja ravi mÀÀramist oluliselt tĂ€psemaks muuta. On ootuspĂ€rane, et lĂ€hitulevikus kuulub sĂŒdame isheemiatĂ”ve tervikliku kĂ€sitluse hulka lisaks klassikalistele riskiteguritele ka geneetiliste markerite hindamine.Eesti Arst 2015; 94(9):522â52
"What's in a Lunchbox?": A Story About New Zealand Ideals of Health, Social Class and Ethnicity Told Through Sandwiches and the Children Who Eat Them
Through an ethnographic investigation of school lunchboxes, this thesis explores if
and how difference and Otherness is understood by children. In three urban New
Zealand primary schools I examine how children construct, affirm and/or
challenge social inequalities and issues of inclusion by looking at the contents,
concepts, narratives and activities related to the consumption and sharing of their
lunch food. Literature dedicated to social class (Bourdieu, 1984) and identity
(Rikoon, 1982; Stern, 1977) has documented the way in which food is creatively
used to reaffirm unity and belonging within minority groups (Camp, 1979;
Abrahams & Kalcik, 1978). In contrast to this approach, I review the role of food
as a âsafe spaceâ (Mercon, 2008: 5) where diversity may be allowed to symbolically
exist for the purpose of affirming the unity of the nation state, while ultimately
muffling deeper social differences. The thesis thus questions the assumption that
food, identity and social cohesion are conceptually linked.
My overall argument centres on the âhumbleâ sandwich, which I claim is
constructed as the core, dominant component of the lunchbox, mutually
constituting nutritional, social class and ethnic tropes, practices and values. I
assess the discourses, behaviours and symbolism that historically situates the
sandwich as iconicaly or emblematically âKiwiâ, contending that via the creation
of a dychotomized system (i.e. healthy, good, skinny, well-behaved, energetic, Kiwi
versus junk-food, bad, fat, naughty, sick, Other) children are enculturated into the
logics of work and socialized to be compliant with structures of inequality. Thus,
while the sandwich appears equally accessible to all, the differences in its
production can result in practices of class based distinction (Bourdieu, 1984) and
ethnic exclusion (Hage, 2003). However, my analysis also reveals that children are
not mere subjects of structure, but that they reproduce, challenge, mediate, and
re-shape these discourses and behaviours
Kodade virvendusarĂŒtmiaga patsientide elupĂ€evade kaetus suukaudsete antikoagulantidega ja ĂŒhe aasta suhteline elulemus: rahvastikupĂ”hine uuring Eestis
Eesti Arst 2023; 102(12):68